quite the wiseass over here, easy with the condescension man lol. I'm well aware of your meaning in the post. I don't think Watchmen was necessarily what he was referring to. more something along the lines of Beauty and the Beast or Van Sant's Psycho tbh.
why exactly????
what about the storyline and themes of Akira need it to be set on Japan???
Hence maybe why they're courting him. He seems to realize already that straight cold humorless cyberpunk isn't hitting with audiences lately.Blade Runner 2049 shows that general audiences don't care for cyber-punk. This movie is dead.
Why not? You only need to set a precedent once. It doesn't matter when you do it.Respect to him for his conviction, but it would never get greenlit starring Asian American unknowns, sadly. Maybe one day, but not today.
Holy shit yesIf you're going to do anything with Akira you go full on Terry Gilliam
I love waititis work but it seems like he wants to make everything he touches a comedy. And that's fine but not for this particular property imo.
I think it's really dangerous to make these films very serious cyber punk. There was a time and place for that and there may be a time and place for that tone, again, but you have to make fresh takes on things.
You're trying to tell me that people don't want to watch some grim, self-important bullshit?
Why, I never.
ill give him a fair chance, he can stay away from outright comedy if he needs to. watch hunt for the wilderpeople.
theres barely any proper comedic moments .
It was lighthearted with comedy bits here and there but i certainly wouldn't call it a comedy in the sense what we do in the shadows was.I don't know if we watched the same film. The whole thing is a comedy.
Something about Keanu just screams anime.
There are five whole books filled with artwork and stories that haven't been touched, so that is where the strength of the story would lie.
I would think two films. One pre-awakening and one post.So are we looking forward to 5 films or are they somehow going to condense all the story in a single film?
Huh? Even with the joi stuff BR still was very much a grim blockbuster. It's got such an oppressive tone and slow build to it as well as some of the themes in the film itself
People tend to throw around terms like "style over substance" and "self important" as solely being criticisms when in fact it also applies to some great films and isn't necessarily a bad thing
Pretty sure if Warner Bros. announces a Batman Beyond movie tomorrow, interest in cyber-punk will go up again.
It's all about super-heroes these days, the mashing of the genre! Make something successful enough, and folks will eat it up.
ill give him a fair chance, he can stay away from outright comedy if he needs to. watch hunt for the wilderpeople.
theres barely any proper comedic moments .
Shame, maybe, but if it gets people's interest rekindled, then...you know, it's for the greater good. For example, folks in general are a lot more open now for some old-school sci-fi thanks to Guardians of the Galaxy.Batman is a comicbook property, of course it would make money.
I think it's a shame they'd have to plaster superheroes on that type of a project to spark interest in a genre to begin with.
I'd love to see a big movie with some unknowns. I get that we enjoy certain actors for whatever reasons, but some stories need fresh faces, man.
Also, you have to make it entertaining. I think it's really dangerous to make these films very serious cyber punk.
And also, this is how you GET Asian-American movie stars. Plenty of WHITE unknowns become famous because they're given a chance in big or popular movies.I'd love to see a big movie with some unknowns. I get that we enjoy certain actors for whatever reasons, but some stories need fresh faces, man.
And also, this is how you GET Asian-American movie stars. Plenty of WHITE unknowns become famous because they're given a chance in big or popular movies.
Damn I thought Spike Lee already made the Akira live actionhttp://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/thor-ragnarok-taika-waititi-interview-1054683
Focus on the manga in terms of adaptation rather than the 80's movie, and let it be its own thing overall. He also wants to cast Asian-American unknowns as the leads. I can't believe I'm saying this, but someone might actually make a good live-action Akira movie.
Seven books? What? No.
Also, Akira is a very action-oriented story. The first three volumes is a bunch of different set pieces over and over. His directorial abilities to tackle that are extremely lackluster.
Also, this.Seven books? What? No.
Also, Akira is a very action-oriented story. The first three volumes is a bunch of different set pieces over and over. His directorial abilities to tackle that are extremely lackluster.
That was Oldboy
Also, Akira is a very action-oriented story. The first three volumes is a bunch of different set pieces over and over. His directorial abilities to tackle that are extremely lackluster.
That was Oldboy
Yeah, I thought the acton scenes in What We Do In the Shadows were just serviceable.
Because I hope you're not solely judging by the Thor movie that just came out, that would weaken your stance considerably
Dude, the people in this thread who went and saw Thor and now think they have Waititi pegged as a director forever are making my eyes roll all the way back down the mountain