-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Tales of Vesperia: Definitive Edition details version resolution and frame rate differences
- Thread starter The Last One
- Start date
Yes. The only console to have that feature.
(Unless XBX also adds it to the Xbox version, they haven't gone into mid-gen enhancements .. which could mean there won't be any).
indeed.
The PS3 was Sub-HD w/ 1280x576, and Xbox 360 was native HD w/ 1280x720. Both with crap AA solutions that blur the image,
Liars.
I doubt this game will support Ultrawide aspect ratios on PC... but I wonder how well it will look modded in, if possible at all?
Hope we'll get a port or definitive edition of Symphonia after this, and then Abyss after that.
And nope, that garbage 30fps port of Symphonia for PC and PS3 does not count.
And nope, that garbage 30fps port of Symphonia for PC and PS3 does not count.
It's possible, I suppose, but given that the chart clearly labels in-battle vs. out-of-battle FPS for the other platforms, I think you can assume that VFR means "there is no FPS cap anywhere in the game," rather than "the FPS cap is different for battles versus elsewhere, but we're not telling you what the caps are" or "parts of the game are uncapped and other parts are not."
While tempted by portable Tales, I went with the PC version. Getting it for $36 didn't hurt either.
I don't understand why 30FPS on the field is even important in a Tales game, rarely anything happens there to justify anything better. Combat is where is at.
It's important in every game for everything because it just looks and plays worse.
Cutscenes and visual elements esp. in towns should look better and feel a bit smoother.
No, just no. 30FPS on the field never affected anything in previous Tales games so I don't see why is anything different here.
(Seriously, are you going to worry that you're going to get caught by the rather slow monsters on the field?).
Well, cutscenes were not even mentioned.
Any sort of movement or camera motion at 30fps is noticeably slow
Yeah, but again, nothing on Tales fields really justify anything more.
Hmm, I was planning to go with the Xbox One version to match my original 1000/1000 achievements on the original game. Might try the PS4 version though to see what the 60FPS outside of battle looks like. Can't say I really expected a difference on the base consoles.
Well it just says inside battle and outside battle, not "field" specifically. I assume outside battle also extends to cutscenes.
It's ridiculous how the Xbox version is the same as the switch resolution and framerate. That alone screams half-assed. The no X and Pro support seals the deal.
My excitement died quickly. I hope people with the base Xbox and midgen consoles don't reward lazyness and quick cash grab attempts like this.
My excitement died quickly. I hope people with the base Xbox and midgen consoles don't reward lazyness and quick cash grab attempts like this.
Switch physical is mine. PC later for cheap digital. But I guess they will use Denuvo again. So I will pay like 5€ max for the PC release.
That's your opinion
I think games feel sluggish at 30fps even on the field or menus. This is made even more noticeable when other elements of the game run at higher framerates, as they will in the switch version.
Well, it has been common opinion during most entries in the series.
(Aside from Zestiria but then again, that was poorly optimized as a whole).
When that is the only option sure. It is fine but just knowing that a better version exist on another console I own makes me consider the PS4 version over the Switch version. One of the people you originally replied to said they try to play their switch outside but end up not doing it. If you play your switch only in TV mode than the PS4 is the clear winner. I wouldn't blame people who play handheld if they went for the Switch version either. I myself am a bit torn on which version I should get.
I mean, I'd probably be more concerned if this was like Xillia/Zestiria/Berseria where they started to actually do things in the in game cutscenes.
But Vesperia though? Nah, I'm not going to trip over in game scenes that are mostly party members standing stiff still, maybe doing a canned hand movement here or there, or maybe Yuri lobs an offscreen slow ass hadoken at someone
But Vesperia though? Nah, I'm not going to trip over in game scenes that are mostly party members standing stiff still, maybe doing a canned hand movement here or there, or maybe Yuri lobs an offscreen slow ass hadoken at someone
Switch version seems more or less the same as the original 360 iteration. Not like I'd pass up handheld Vesperia, anyway.
I could and maybe should get this for PS4, but I'm in such a Switch mentality lately that there's a decent chance that'll be my pick.
I hope that's what it actually means.
It would be the first Tales of game on PC that isn't 60 FPS capped.
No enhancements? What the fuck?
What's going on with Japanese remasters that doesn't have an Pro or X enhancement lately. That's so stupid.
What's going on with Japanese remasters that doesn't have an Pro or X enhancement lately. That's so stupid.
True but I'm optimistic because they literally say variable refresh
I had the switch version pre ordered already, I don't mind it being 30 fps out of the battlefield as long as its 60 in battle. Ill probably end up buying the pc version as well. I can't pass up Tales on the go though.
Which is why I'm even happier to get ttonreplay this with a games worth of new content.
It was really the last tales game for me.