-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Teen Kills Pedophile Priest Who Abused Him By Ramming Crucifix Down Priest’s Throat
- Thread starter Cow Mengde
- Start date
Murdering an innocent is one thing, murdering a paedophile who not only raped you, but likely others as well is another thing.
It's not the same, or even close to being the same.
Then practice the closest thing we have to a rule of law on this forum and file a complaint. The report link as at the bottom left of every post.
Its upsetting that this guy screwed himself by getting "payback". He clearly needed psychiatric treatment more than anything else judging by the gruesome way he killed the sick fuck. But I doubt he thinks its worth it now that the moment is over. I just hope he gets another shot at having a normal life someday after extensive treatment and rehabilitation.
That's some heavy stuff, I'll say that much. The cruel cinematic nature of this priest's death is breathtaking, and it's hard to overlook such a brutal act. That's a horror movie or seminal film on crime right there: you shoved a cross down someone's throat to kill them, alright, Linda Blair ain't got shit on you.
And yet, that child was murdered first.
And yet, that child was murdered first.
...what?
You said you found most celebratory posts in this thread distasteful and that's why you've felt compelled to whine about the reactions of others. So why not practice that yourself if it's a solution you feel beneficial?
You can disagree with it, but I doubt you would agree that there is no nuance whatsoever to this case.
Well where I am it genuinely seems to be. Maybe you live somewhere with greater issues with violence.
Our society(and law) simply fails if it can't recognise the difference between the two.
Vigilantism is a horrifying thing. It's also the natural result when you build a society that allows a small circle of elites to commit unspeakable horrors for decades without recourse.
It never should have gotten to this point. The tragedy goes back to the 60s and continues as this kid inevitably does time for the awful way he decided end the cycle of abuse.
It never should have gotten to this point. The tragedy goes back to the 60s and continues as this kid inevitably does time for the awful way he decided end the cycle of abuse.
i don't know how it works in France, but a situation like this is why an actual system of rehabilitation instead of the bullshit prison system in America would be nice. No you can't really condone this kind of vigilante justice, but it's also fair to understand and empathize with the circumstances that might have led this person down the road and possibly help them back into a meaningful, productive existence instead of just throwing them away.
I am quite tired, it is 2am. Please show me where I have "felt compelled to whine about the reactions of others".
I may have forgotten it.
All I did was post a view point and half the thread disagreed with me. I tried to respond to everyone who responded to me.
This kid does not deserve to carry the stigma of murder. Such a horrible scenario that only happened because of a worthless pedo and the disgusting institution protecting monsters like these just to keep their privileges intact.
>I'm expected a lighter, but not much, sentence. Mainly as we don't want to encourage others to take up arms,
Maybe governments should get better at getting rid of evil so people shouldn't have to.
There is nuance and depending on the French system may get negotiated down t a lower charge,
Solid argument you've got going there, pal. So sad you didn't agree with me on my controversial "murder is bad" standpoint,
I believe you read that wrong. Self defense is an example of something making it acceptable. I wasn't stating that this was self defense.
The rest, however, directly related to this. Creating your own murderer through evil acts I think justifies it. He also severely damaged others ability to live life. Again, why should he be able to take and destroy without repercussion? No action was being taken. There was no other recourse. The world is now also a better place.
The boy needs therapy, probably for life. Not incarceration. That would just be the system failing again, making this young man into a hardened criminal.
I'd argue that prison in general in parts of the world doesn't purely act as a deterrence. Much more has to get involved. Luckily my country (Sweden) has a reputation for doing it a lot better than others.
Haha I know right? The hardened "anti death" boners here. With their haughty holier than thou attitude. It's enriching
As a Brit/Swede I think his sentencing should be long term psychotherapy and a period of incarceration. Sweden has a pretty good record with this,
People thinking that people shouldn't be murdered are just the worst,
Revenge murders will never be permissible as justified as they can be. I know I would feel differently if it was me or my child, but the only way to maintain order is by not being allowed to take the law into your own hands.
If the guy had been in a situation where he was in danger then yeah, he would be facing something less serious. But being as the pedo was 91 and he was murdered so gruesomely, he screwed himself by doing this. Anyway you slice it, he is a murderer now even though the priest is what brought him to it and this mental state.
We have a similar system in the Netherlands, murderers and rapists still commit crimes after they've been helped, I'm sure it happens in Sweden too.
I would also seek out financial compensation by the church for the father and son.
He needs both. For a start the evidence shows he is far from safe.
If the church swept it under the carpet and did't contact the police then yes.
I actually edited in something similar at the bottom while you were responding. Therapy, for sure, and nothing wrong with putting him in a facility for a period where he can't leave with that purpose. Actual prison though I think would just be the system failing again, creating an actual criminal.
See I agree with this. I would never want him to receive anything more than the lightest sentence available to the judge but there still needs to be some sort of statement made that revenge murder is never okay.
Your alternative doesn't apply in this situation and doesn't exist in this world at the moment. He had immunity, so it was either die a natural death like anybody else or this outcome.
