Also, if anyone wants to enlighten people, this thread has EVERY TERF POINT being applied to homosexuals. From sports to bathrooms to prisons... everything.
These 2, but specially the bottom one ... is just ... chefkiss
Also, if anyone wants to enlighten people, this thread has EVERY TERF POINT being applied to homosexuals. From sports to bathrooms to prisons... everything.
Anyone suggesting Rowling isn't doing any harm has been a dumbass for awhile.
I link this article more since it is a more direct consequence of her actions for people to understand
JK Rowling's 'transphobic attacks' are damaging LGBT+ rights in UK, warns report
JK Rowling and transphobic hate speech are reasons why the UK is sliding down the ILGA-Europe equality index, a new report says.www.pinknews.co.uk
These 2, but specially the bottom one ... is just ... chefkiss
Lol she's one step away from accidentally admitting cancel culture is a sham.
Inherent transphobia.*BUMP*
And she is back:
J.K. Rowlings erfolgreiches neues Kinderbuch
J.K. Rowling wollten viele in der Verbannung sehen. Kam anders: Sie hat ein Kinderbuch geschrieben. Und das ist jetzt schon ein Bestseller.www.sueddeutsche.de
" A year ago, J.K. Rowling had a veritable shitstorm at her heels, including calls for boycot / canceling. Now she is back, with a new bestseller."
Acticle is behind a paywal..
BUT, so far the media in Germany did not portrait her as the offender, rather then the victim.
I mean they discussed what the fuzz was about, but I did not have the impression that the media held her responsible for what she did.
And this headline does not either.
But why does the media not hold her accountable for what she did/does?
*BUMP*
And she is back:
J.K. Rowlings erfolgreiches neues Kinderbuch
J.K. Rowling wollten viele in der Verbannung sehen. Kam anders: Sie hat ein Kinderbuch geschrieben. Und das ist jetzt schon ein Bestseller.www.sueddeutsche.de
" A year ago, J.K. Rowling had a veritable shitstorm at her heels, including calls for boycot / canceling. Now she is back, with a new bestseller."
Acticle is behind a paywal..
BUT, so far the media in Germany did not portrait her as the offender, rather as the victim.
I mean they discussed what the discussion was about, but I did not have the impression that the media held her responsible for what she did.
And this headline does not either.
But why does the media not hold her accountable for what she did/does?
You know why.And this headline does not either.
But why does the media not hold her accountable for what she did/does?
"But she's made something i like, so she can't be a bad person."But it is so grating. I googled some more pieces of said news paper and the sentiment was as far as I read it:
"She is one of us"
"She just wants to be called a women"
"The new book is not good , but no TERF book either"
It makes me angry. Dear newspaper reporter , literature freelancer , whatever , she is not one of you
She is a billionaire punching down. Why is this so hard to acknowledge?
Is the sentiment thesame for other newspapers, outlets ?
Ah, so the UK doesn't have any anti-SLAPP laws then.I mean one of the reasons is she's literally threatened the few publications that have challenged her with legal recourse because the UK is just silly like that and she's one of the richest people alive so she can throw money at a lawyer until just about anyone is buried. Yes, a lot of people don't care about transphobia, but Rowling has financially invested in making certain that those who do care (at least in the UK) cannot easily afford to say so.
In 2020, though, she followed up with a detailed post on her website. She reiterated her support for trans people and her belief they should be able to live free from harassment; but she also revealed that as a survivor of an abusive marriage, she knew the cost of male violence, and did not want to see sex-based protections for women and girls dismantled.
It was an intimate and considered piece of writing that should have inspired sympathy even among those who disagreed. Instead, it lit a bonfire of condemnation. By the end of 2020, all three main Harry Potter stars had either directly condemned or unambiguously distanced themselves from Rowling: none offered support to her as a victim of domestic violence.
This only helps to explain some of the reaction in the UK, though. The extremity of the global condemnation of Rowling has to be understood in the context of who she is. As the creator of a generation's most beloved character, Rowling was not just treasured, but coveted. There was a feeling that she somehow belonged to her fans.
Her failure to take the required line was experienced as more than a disappointment. It was a crushing betrayal by a symbolic mother.
Rowling's beliefs are that sex is real, that male violence is a problem, that women should be able to talk about themselves in clear language, and that no woman should lose her job for expressing such opinions. No critics have convincingly explained why believing these things hurts trans people.
The rage against Rowling is actually rage against her for being a woman who has not politely faded into the background, but who has instead asserted her voice and her boundaries. That is what is specifically infuriating about her – and it's why one of the favoured tactics from her attackers was to reply to her tweets with images of pornography.
The sexual nature of the violation was not accidental. But Rowling has not buckled under the abuse. She is, for now, the inadvertent figurehead of a highly contentious issue; but she is too much her own woman to be reduced to a caricature by anyone.
Likewise, and exactly... They know what they are doing.I'm tired. :(
No one is denying that sex is real or male violence is real. But I of course see what they are doing there...
Supposedly Rowling was only talking about "fear of men" yet this horrible and incapacitating fear of men only impacts how she believes we should treat trans women. It certainly didn't stop her from marrying a man a second time. Weird how selectively it comes up.
I liked The New European.The New European wrote an article defending Rowling yesterday, another place to avoid
The money and power is exactly why. Any publications that went against her were hit with legal threats from her.Why do so many people and places keep defending Rowling. She doesn't need defending. She has money and power. She isn't going anywhere.
I guess for the clicks or something. I don't get it.
She didn't have a problem with her address being public in a tour guide but now it's an issue because it involves trans people
(in case this isn't apparent in the quote he debunks its existence even at a marginal scale)For years now, right-wing media has cast trans people (and especially the dreaded "TRAs" — trans rights activists) as radical, hysterical and dangerous. The primary evidence for this claim is the frequency with which they bully their critics online.
This charge is irrelevant, of course. The fact that some percentage of gay people are jerks on the internet has nothing to do with the merits of gay marriage. Transphobes regularly bully and harass trans people online; their fellow transphobes appear not to think it invalidates their cause.
And yet, the charge of bullying has become central to anti-trans rhetoric. Here is Andrew "I'm against eugenics but" Sullivan arguing that trans rights activists have the power and cultural capital to "blackmail" their opponents into submission.
100%.TERFs all hyped up on twitter about 3 people taking pictures at a literal fucking landmark location as "doxxing", all the while actually harrassing those 3 individuals off of twitter and laughing at them protecting their accounts thanks to JK weaponizing her massive platform against them.
She always seems to do this shit following any period of trans recognition, like the last time she went off during Pride.
Oh sorry I didn't even realize JK Rowling herself broadcast their individual profiles directly to her 14 million followers, and her TERF supporters have been following suit.
Sad to see Contrapoints sticking up for this dishonest framing as well.