• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

V23

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,948
Article from Wired

Wired said:
The electric automaker shuns lasers for its self-driving features. But a patent application foresees using the technology to clean windshields and cameras.

---

A newly published patent application, for which Tesla filed in May, describes the "pulsed laser cleaning of debris" that tends to gather on car windshields and solar panels.

---

While windshield wipers may do the job for most people, Tesla's patent application notes that the process of scrubbing away grime and letting the glass dry results in "unproductive time," and that the chemicals in wiper fluid could damage a camera's electronics. Using a laser to burn off any unwanted muck, the patent argues, would be faster and more likely to keep everything working as intended.

Elon also has plans for a revolutionary new car wash idea...

tenor.gif


SereneVagueHaddock-size_restricted.gif
 

butalala

Member
Nov 24, 2017
5,243
I can't wait for these to melt through the windscreen of the Model S2 when Elon unveils it in a few years.
 

HStallion

Member
Oct 25, 2017
62,222
So it doesn't sound like these would actually deal with rain but just grime that would build up on a windshield over the long term?
 

WedgeX

Member
Oct 27, 2017
13,162
So cars are going to shoot lasers at...windshields...with people's eyes just there for the shooting into?
 

Jarrod38

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,650
I think it was McLaren wanted to have their cars with ultra sonic force field to replace wipers but don't know what ever happened to that idea.
 

Raccoon

Member
May 31, 2019
15,896
the idea that it will replace window wipers, most often used to deal with rain, is asinine speculation
 

Deleted member 3812

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,821
How can Tesla solve the problem of lasers causing permanent damage to people's eyes???:


A 9-year-old boy in Greece permanently injured his left eye when he repeatedly gazed into a laser pointer's green beam, doctors say.

Examination revealed a large hole in the macula, a small area in the retina that helps with discerning detail in faces and while reading or driving, the doctors said in a case report published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Further imaging revealed two more injured areas below the macular hole.

Macular holes are typically treated with surgery that is accompanied with an almost 100% risk of cataract formation, Dr. Sofia Androudi, a physician involved with the case, wrote in an email. Cataracts cause blurry vision by clouding the eyes' clear lenses.

However, in this case, because the macular hole resulted from the laser burn, the nerves in the eye that absorb light were totally damaged, said Androudi, an assistant professor of ophthalmology at the University of Thessaly in Greece. "This means that even if the surgery would be successful, the boy would not be able to see."

The boy's vision was measured at 20/20 in his right eye and 20/100 in his left, according to the report. A person with a visual acuity of 20/100 would have to be within 20 feet of a point of focus in order to see what a person with normal vision can see at 100 feet.
 

Anustart

9 Million Scovilles
Avenger
Nov 12, 2017
9,037
LOL at companies coming up with new tech!

Hahahahahah what idiots!
 

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220

Deleted member 7130

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,685
So lasers strong enough to melt debris... in front of the unprotected eyes of drivers and passengers...

What could possibly go wrong?
 

Deleted member 20284

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
2,889
Self driving cars that don't take dents now with destructive lasers. What could possibly go wrong. The automated factory is nearly online sir Skynet, just a few adjustments...
 
Oct 27, 2017
42,700
ITT people who don't realize patents don't mean an idea will be used or that the obvious "issues" they bring up weren't already brought up or considered
 

InfiniDragon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,305
So uh, Elon heard the Top Gear joke about Lancia using laser beams to clean the windshield and decided "hey great idea"?

Not sure how they'll prevent eye damage from the beams there, but if they can actually manage a working system it'd be interesting to see.
 

Deleted member 2625

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,596
I always thought it should be something like horizontal Kevlar threads that cycle around the windscreen. Wipers do feel oddly old fashioned. Anyone ever use Rain-X?

How can Tesla solve the problem of lasers causing permanent damage to people's eyes???:


all lasers are not equal

so to answer your question, they could use a very low wattage and not point it at people's eyes for starters

disclaimer: I am not a laser
 

Anustart

9 Million Scovilles
Avenger
Nov 12, 2017
9,037
You people think this is like a robotic arm that raises up and beams straight into to the vehicle? Come on. Lol.
 

nded

Member
Nov 14, 2017
10,554
This sounds like a reasonable thing to have for camera and solar panel installations.

Windshields I'm not so sure about.
 

Keikaku

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,768
Sounds safe. Rock chips in the windshield won't scatter the laser to anyone's eyes I'm sure.
 

Anustart

9 Million Scovilles
Avenger
Nov 12, 2017
9,037
Sounds safe. Rock chips in the windshield won't scatter the laser to anyone's eyes I'm sure.

Headlights sound safe. Your lights hitting someone crack and spreading then bouncing around inside their eye destroying all rods and cones in it's path!

Jesus. We seriously worried about some fringe case that would happen .0000000000001% of the time? Come on.

Most people in this thread must use this song as a theme song:

 

CosmicGP

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,870
I'm more interested in what solution they have for the cybertrucks wing mirrors short of just sticking some cameras on sticks to its doors, but that would ruin its lines...
 

Anustart

9 Million Scovilles
Avenger
Nov 12, 2017
9,037
Elon Musk is an asshole, so yes.



Did Gabe Newell ever call anyone a pedophile for saying Steam was a bad idea?

Nope, but the original outrage at steam started because people were upset their favorite porn visual novels might be banned and valve didn't give a bullet point list detailing exactly every single possible scenario why their favorite 1000 year old dragon vn's wouldn't be allowed on the store.
 

ThreePi

Member
Dec 7, 2017
4,758
People here really hate Tesla/Musk, huh?

Seriously. People's perception of Musk makes them revert to some Amish/Mennonite who think technology is some evil force. If this was the 1800s and someone tried explaining the internal combustion engine to them they'd scoff at the idea of using small explosions to push a horseless carriage.