Before I read the article, I wasn't sure how I felt about it.
After reading the article, I think they made the right decision.
After reading the article, I think they made the right decision.
I would not, it's fucked up. I'd eventually get over it and talk to the living parent again (assuming they weren't secretly at deaths door too) but I would always hate them for it at least a little.
If you know about it it completely changes your actions. You can be there to help support them. You can be there to do things with them you wouldn't otherwise do. You can help support research causes and search for treatments.I feel like a reaction this visceral deserves unpacking.
- In what sense is it "fucked up"?
- Even if you think you should be told right away, do you genuinely see no reasoning at all as to why they might want to withhold it for at least a little while? Like, none all? And if so, why? This needs elaboration?
- Why would it make you stop talking to them for a period of time? Presumably you are at least partially upset that you have been robbed of the ability to maximise your time with them with the clock ticking, which makes shunning them completely illogical?
3 years seems like a long time. Although my kids are younger, I think if I were in this situation I'd give them about 6 months of a heads up.
Haven't read the article yet, when did they break it to the kids?
If you know about it it completely changes your actions. You can be there to help support them. You can be there to do things with them you wouldn't otherwise do. You can help support research causes and search for treatments.
That's some total bs dude. It's also completely infantilizing. Like oh I'm sorry you don't respect my own intelligence or mental stability enough to tell me, I'm just your own child. It'll be much better when you're just dead some day and I'll I know is that you didn't think I could be bothered to know.None of this is incorrect, but that may not be what they need or want. If the ill person needs those things from their kids and can't get them elsewhere, they will tell them.
Like I said earlier in the thread I have some skin in this particular game. I have enough, (i.e. too many) people already offering me sympathy, support, advice etc.
What I want for, and from my son while I am in treatment is to see him happy, living an innocent childhood and unburdened by scenarios and fears that he isn't able to effectively deal with at his age. I want to see him burst in the door from daycare exciting to show me the caterpillar he made from an egg carton rather than see the fear and confusion on his face when I tell him that there were cancerous cells right up to my margin, followed by a lecture of "Radiotherapy explained for three year olds."
That's some total bs dude. It's also completely infantilizing. Like oh I'm sorry you don't respect my own intelligence or mental stability enough to tell me, I'm just your own child. It'll be much better when you're just dead some day and I'll I know is that you didn't think I could be bothered to know.
When my dad was put in a similar situation he immediately let everyone know because of the pain the alternative causes and because he respects us. There wasn't a costant doom and gloom over all interactions, it was the opposite.
So like I said, hiding near death is bs and I wouldn't forgive it. I guess it works out for the dying person because they don't have to deal with the fallout.
Think of it this way- for the rest of their life, no matter what anyone tells them, your child will have a nagging voice in the back of their mind wondering if they weren't important enough/you didn't like them enough to tell them you were dying. And nothing will ever make that go away.You seem very black and white about it all and taking everything to its extremes. To start with, the scenario isn't about them not knowing until your dead. It's about waiting for the right time. Secondly, suggesting that not telling your child straight away means you don't respect them or their intelligence is a very hot take. There seems to be a strong sense in your argument that the parent in these scenarios is being "selfish" but when you flip it around, it kinda comes across that you are putting yourself at the centre of everything... not really considering the person actually dying and what they might want from their remaining short time on earth.
The only thing I think I can agree with is that yes, I am infantilizing my three year old child. Guilty as charged.
Think of it this way- for the rest of their life, no matter what anyone tells them, your child will have a nagging voice in the back of their mind wondering if they weren't important enough/you didn't like them enough to tell them you were dying.
It is a guaranteed outcome. It's what will happen. Look at all the other people in this thread on that side of the situation that say similar things. ESPECIALLY if you've told people who aren't your kids.Why do I have to think of it that way? That is not in any way an objective truth or guaranteed outcome.
I could just as easily say "for the rest of their life, that child will be in awe of the incredible bravery and selflessness their parent showed by letting them have as many joyous last days together with you without tarnishing years of your childhood with fear and uncertainty",
Both scenarios are on the far extreme of pessimism and optimism. The reality would probably be somewhere between the two, because you know what... life is messy, nuanced, confusing... people do what they feel is best in situations of extreme angst and uncertainty. You'd do well to be a little more open to that. You can empathise with people without necessarily agreeing with their particular decisions. It's part of growing up.
It is a guaranteed outcome. It's what will happen. Look at all the other people in this thread on that side of the situation that say similar things.
Our girls have talked often about their mother's sacrifice and said to me without prompting, "I am so glad I didn't know what Mommy was going through. I would have worried every single day." In these past two months, they have reassured me again and again that not telling them was the loving choice.
The kids in article got fucked over too. It'll Shadow them for the rest of their lives.Um, how about you look at the kids in the actual article being discussed?
It's quite unbelievable at this point how you are applying your particular emotional reaction as a universal constant that applies to everyone.
The kids in article got fucked over too. It'll Shadow them for the rest of their lives.
It's just wild to me that you're ruining your kids life because you're afraid they will have a negative reaction while simultaneously think they'll have a positive enough response after the fact to not hate you for it.
I already told you that I don't have to because my dad did the right thing.Wow, you're an asshole to go there. A total asshole. I don't need to engage with this shit any longer.
I still hope you don't have to face the same dilemma one day. It's not fun.
I would not, it's fucked up. I'd eventually get over it and talk to the living parent again (assuming they weren't secretly at deaths door too) but I would always hate them for it at least a little.
Wow, you're an asshole to go there. A total asshole. I don't need to engage with this shit any longer.
I still hope you don't have to face the same dilemma one day. It's not fun.
It has an easy answer, it's just not easy to do. Apparently not everyone's up to the task.Best not to waste your time there.
I appreciate your giving your perspective and trying to at least be reasonable about the topic that has no easy answers. Especially when it comes to young kids. All the best to you in your treatment and recovery.
I would not, it's fucked up. I'd eventually get over it and talk to the living parent again (assuming they weren't secretly at deaths door too) but I would always hate them for it at least a little.
Sheltering your kids this much is unhealthy. Fact is that death is part of life and it's better for them to learn to understand at an early age.
The kids in article got fucked over too. It'll Shadow them for the rest of their lives.
It's just wild to me that you're ruining your kids life because you're afraid they will have a negative reaction while simultaneously think they'll have a positive enough response after the fact to not hate you for it.
She lived for nearly 10 years. If you don't think the thought of your parent dying any day now for 10 years won't have a negative impact on kids I don't know what to tell you.
It is a guaranteed outcome. It's what will happen. Look at all the other people in this thread on that side of the situation that say similar things. ESPECIALLY if you've told people who aren't your kids.
But like I said, it's not like you'll have to deal with it so you do you I guess
Best not to waste your time there.
I appreciate your giving your perspective and trying to at least be reasonable about the topic that has no easy answers. Especially when it comes to young kids. All the best to you in your treatment and recovery.
Grug, wishing you all the best. I think you're doing a great job at explaining your situation to your still very young son.
I would rather be able to share in the joy of knowing my parent outlived the prognosis than find out retroactively that she was keeping a dark secret from me for a decade.She lived for nearly 10 years. If you don't think the thought of today is the day your mom might die, for 10 years, won't have a negative impact on a kid's psyche then I don't know what to tell you.
I would rather be able to share in the joy of knowing my parent outlived the prognosis than find out retroactively that she was keeping a dark secret from me for a decade.
It is sheltering. I think this line of thought of yours is very similar to the logic that cheaters use - that not telling someone something important isn't actually lying. You're "doing it to protect them". "Telling them would only hurt".There isn't really any way to "shelter" them from death in this context; they were always going to find out no matter what. There is no real benefit to exposing them to the protracted grief and hopelessness of a situation like this. They waited until death was close and then told the kids in a comfortable place during a time of year where they'd be able to spend days grieving without the embarrassment of crying in school.
They would not be able to enjoy school, friends, their teams, or birthday parties. They'd be watching too closely—how she looked, moved, acted, ate, or didn't. Marla wanted her daughters to stay children: unburdened, confident that tomorrow would look like yesterday.
It is sheltering. I think this line of thought of yours is very similar to the logic that cheaters use - that not telling someone something important isn't actually lying. You're "doing it to protect them". "Telling them would only hurt".
Grug your kid is 3, the problem is that she literally won't understand. Your seem to actually be telling your kid what's going on, so that's alright. I don't think you should be taking this personally. And there is no right way of handling something like this. I most definitely sympathize with your situation.
I'm not calling you a cheater, and I'm not calling people in general who do this cheaters. The logic is just very similar. As I say, in the same post that you neglected to read, I understand and sympathize people who do this (not cheaters, mind you)....right. Thanks for your contribution: didn't really need to consider any of the rest after this gem.
A know a woman who didn't learn that her grandfather had cancern until he was literally on his deathbed when she was 15. Basically broke her. She didn't have time to prepare herself. Keeping stuff like this from children wouldn't be my choice.
I would rather be able to share in the joy of knowing my parent outlived the prognosis than find out retroactively that she was keeping a dark secret from me for a decade.
Oh yeah. Uncalled for, especially to you in your situation. I agree with the saying that there's no right way to handle these kinds of situations. You're overwhelmed with emotions, I'm not going to blame you for not handling it in the best way possible, you can't expect that from anyone. No one handles it in the best way possible, no one can.Bit hard not to take it personally when a poster explicitly tells you you are ruining your kids life, you don't respect them and that they are guaranteed to hate you for it.
Depends on the age, IMO from whenever they can appreciably understand the situation itself, it should be as soon as possible. Every delay between diagnosis and telling them is going to be a period of lies. The shorter the better I would say. All that matters really is that the parent is prepared to talk about it. Children will be able to handle it fine as long as you can talk openly to them about it. Good idea would be to talk to a family therapist about this, so you can get feedback on the best way for you and your family to handle it.Is there a case to be made for a reasonable period of notice though. Somewhere appreciably after diagnosis but also appreciably before death bed?
That's really impressive keeping up day to day activities while also successfully masking the illness, and for many years.
So this seems like a terrible way to teach kids about mortality.
I'd wager that they were projecting their hangups about mortality onto their children.