Aren't the USA also threatening to not do it? They both have a lot to gain
Even with all the bullshit the USA has pulled, is pulling and will be pulling, I would rather be their puppet than China's.
Aren't the USA also threatening to not do it? They both have a lot to gain
That is true.Even with all the bullshit the USA has pulled, is pulling and will be pulling, I would rather be their puppet than China's.
Or maybe we can move to facts.Even with all the bullshit the USA has pulled, is pulling and will be pulling, I would rather be their puppet than China's.
As many issues as I have with the US government, we haven't had a track record of routinely disappearing people criticizing the government. I'd long have been murdered if I lived in China. So nah.I think that the USA is way in front of technology in that regard. It is a bit like the Chinese woman trying to install the spyware at Maralago .The USA has way more experience in this game I think and also much more money. If you know their defense budget.
The Chinese government is only much more authoritarian and horrible.
It's funny how people are using "whataboutism" left and right as counter argument but not realizing that they are on the side where the Soviets were regarding whataboutism.
Yes the USSR used whataboutism to deflect any discussion about their wrongdoings to point back at the USA.
However this thread about China and Huawei. Whatever the USA and CIA had done derails the conversation and draws false equivalence between the two countries.
Lol, some are here in this forumIt's wild that there's still Huawei apologists in the west after all the alarms being sounded about the company.
Only that people are screaming whataboutism after the fact was stated that the CIA and US other agencies failed to provide any evidences about backdoors in Huawei hardware in all those years.
They're not going to provide evidence which would be classified as it would reveal how they know and what they know. It's how the spy game works.
Believe it or not but it's always been this way.
There was also forensic evidence that Russian malware compromised the DNC and people still didn't believe it.
I'm pretty leary about all the Huawei shit. Like, it literally started becoming a thing a few months after Trump started a trade war with China. The timing is suspicious. Not the behavior. The behavior is basically what I expect every government in every country with enough money to do it is doing. But the sudden PR swing against it feels like its probably generated to try and drum up anti-Chinese sentiment in the west.It's wild that there's still Huawei apologists in the west after all the alarms being sounded about the company.
That's nonsense. One proven evidence of a backdoor in crucial network infrastructure would kill Huawei and would end all discussion about the topic.
That's how reality works. Not your James Bond fantasy.
I don't disagree with that.
My point is they wouldn't want to reveal what they know and how they know it to keep China guessing.
If they publicly disclose it, it could be used by other third parties, whereas the US government can probably use it themselves.
Such vulnerabilities are always kept secret as long as possible.
Your fantasy is thinking the CIA will publish detailed evidence in order to make sure the Glenn Greenwalds of the world are convinced.
America treats black people like shit too.The most pragmatic way of looking at this (assuming you are a westerner) is deciding whether you want to be spied on by a democratic hegemony that is likely allied with your country, or a borderline-fascist up and coming totalitarian dictatorship with increasing global influence. Unless you go full Richard Stallman there's really no way to opt out of it, so pick your poison.
Even if you go full anti-American and consider them worse than the PRC due to their external meddling, the decision comes down to supporting a country that treats others like shit versus a country that treats their own people like shit. Maybe it's selfish, but I'd sure as hell rather live in a relatively free interventionist country than an IRL 1984 society that sticks to economic intimidation over physical warfare.
The most pragmatic way of looking at this (assuming you are a westerner) is deciding whether you want to be spied on by a democratic hegemony that is likely allied with your country, or a borderline-fascist up and coming totalitarian dictatorship with increasing global influence. Unless you go full Richard Stallman there's really no way to opt out of it, so pick your poison.
Even if you go full anti-American and consider them worse than the PRC due to their external meddling, the decision comes down to supporting a country that treats others like shit versus a country that treats their own people like shit. Maybe it's selfish, but I'd sure as hell rather live in a relatively free interventionist country than an IRL 1984 society that sticks to economic intimidation over physical warfare.
Even ignoring that countries are running IT security systems which would actually easily find out if data get send somewhere unknown.
Maybe you're too young to remember the last big blunder from the CIA using an anonymous UK source.It's wild that there's still Huawei apologists in the west after all the alarms being sounded about the company.
Which users?These threads about china always get so weird. Users who post nowhere else on this forum pop up out of the woodwork and get extremely defensive in their bid to exonerate china of any wrongdoing. I don't believe the schtick for a second, sorry.
please leave black people out of this. No one wants a part in this stupid whataboutism debate.
please leave black people out of this. No one wants a part in this stupid whataboutism debate.
So when the US agency calls out Huawei for doing what they are proven to be doing, but doesn't provide any evidence, that's not whataboutism. But when people point out these facts, that's whataboutism. Simple logic, 2019 post-factual flavor
Researchers at U.S. tech giant Microsoft recently revealed that they discovered a backdoor in certain Huawei laptop models that allowed unprivileged users to gain access to all laptop data.
This vulnerability is similar to the technique DoublePulsar, a malware tool leaked by the hacker group The Shadow Brokers in early 2017. It had infected more than 200,000 computers running on Microsoft Windows software within a few weeks.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/micro...at-could-give-hackers-access_2863926.html/amp
Microsoft found a backdoor in Huawei laptops:
For someone who works in the IT security industry, you are sure misleading .
It's a safety vulnerability , which if you even read just your quoted part happened in the past
Does all of this apply even when people find vulnerability issues on Windows? Are you saying that even those are "pre planted"?How am I being misleading? All I did is post that backdoors have been found in Huawei products. So it's hardly unprecedented to see the US accuse Huawei.
You're acting like the US accused the Vatican of planting spyware.
Of course it's a vulnerability.
, you think it's going to be called CCPBackdoor.exe running as a service?
Right in that same article it's noted that it's same technique used by leaked NSA malware called DoublePulsar. Intentionally inserting vulnerabilities is the way to go, if someone finds you can just say "oops we will fix it sorry".
Now if it's a remote access tool that accepts a login name "ccpspy" it's a little harder to claim "we don't know how that got there", when it's inevitably found.
And of course it's been fixed. Microsoft found it, reported it to Huawei who had no choice but to fix it given the scrutiny on them. Microsoft reported it long after it was fixed.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/micro...at-could-give-hackers-access_2863926.html/amp
Microsoft found a backdoor in Huawei laptops:
Does all of this apply even when people find vulnerability issues on Windows? Are you saying that even those are "pre planted"?
As many issues as I have with the US government, we haven't had a track record of routinely disappearing people criticizing the government. I'd long have been murdered if I lived in China. So nah.
Or you could just link to Microsoft's blog plost.
Which doesn't support your view at all.
We discovered such a driver while investigating an alert raised by Microsoft Defender Advanced Threat Protection's kernel sensors.
Starting in Windows 10, version 1809, the kernel has been instrumented with new sensors designed to trace User APC code injection initiated by a kernel code, providing better visibility into kernel threats like DOUBLEPULSAR. As described in our in-depth analysis, DOUBLEPULSAR is a kernel backdoor used by the WannaCry ransomware to inject the main payload into user-space. DOUBLEPULSAR copied the user payload from the kernel into an executable memory region in lsass.exe and inserted a User APC to a victim thread with NormalRoutine targeting this region.
DoublePulsar is a backdoor implant tool developed by the U.S. National Security Agency's (NSA) Equation Group that was leaked by The Shadow Brokers in early 2017
I think what posters here are claiming is that US and China are fighting for hagemony there is no right or wrong it is just a fight so it's ironic that Western posters here are claiming moral high ground. It is simply us vs. them and you should be honest about it.Since when has hypocrisy been an issue in geopolitics. A backdoor gives the host country an advantage. Obviously the spooks in the US want them for their use, and the spooks in China want them for their use. Some users were advocating for cutting China and and Russia completely off of the internet. It's clearly a us vs. them fight and people are taking side according to where they are from and not which is moral.
It's like calling war violent. That's its nature.
The most pragmatic way of looking at this (assuming you are a westerner) is deciding whether you want to be spied on by a democratic hegemony that is likely allied with your country, or a borderline-fascist up and coming totalitarian dictatorship with increasing global influence. Unless you go full Richard Stallman there's really no way to opt out of it, so pick your poison.
Even if you go full anti-American and consider them worse than the PRC due to their external meddling, the decision comes down to supporting a country that treats others like shit versus a country that treats their own people like shit. Maybe it's selfish, but I'd sure as hell rather live in a relatively free interventionist country than an IRL 1984 society that sticks to economic intimidation over physical warfare.
It is not just "the West". Go ask someone from Taiwan or Hong Kong if they prefer the US or the CCP. The Chinese government is disliked even more in East Asia than the west.I think what posters here are claiming is that US and China are fighting for hagemony there is no right or wrong it is just a fight so it's ironic that Western posters here are claiming moral high ground. It is simply us vs. them and you should be honest about it.
Eh, even the majority in Asia.It is not just "the West". Go ask someone from Taiwan or Hong Kong if they prefer the US or the CCP. The Chinese government is disliked even more in East Asia than the west.
I don't understand what you are trying to imply.It is not just "the West". Go ask someone from Taiwan or Hong Kong if they prefer the US or the CCP. The Chinese government is disliked even more in East Asia than the west.
P.S. and some users are crying whataboutism. You have literally two choices, I don't think mentioning bad things about one of them is invalid.
I'm not defending the USA, I just find it amusing that posters crawl out of the woodwork acting like China spying and having backdoors is unprecedented and we need some hard core evidence before we can make a conclusion.
But in the meantime here is some bad shit the US has done so let's talk about that instead.
That "posters crawl out of the woodwork" is a pretty pathetic method to paint the posters who give their opinion in a bad way. It is so visible and a pretty weak response.I'm not defending the USA, I just find it amusing that posters crawl out of the woodwork acting like China spying and having backdoors is unprecedented and we need some hard core evidence before we can make a conclusion.
But in the meantime here is some bad shit the US has done so let's talk about that instead.
Let's summarize some facts:
So when the US agency calls out Huawei for doing what they are proven to be doing, but doesn't provide any evidence, that's not whataboutism. But when people point out these facts, that's whataboutism. Simple logic, 2019 post-factual flavor.
- The CIA is well known for making us manufacturers plant backdoors in their products. Hard prove exists for that.
- The CIA is well known for providing completely made-up evidence to perpetuate their agendas. Hard prove exists for that.
- Huawei has been accused a million times of planting backdoors n their products as ordered by Chinese regime. We are still waiting for the first hard prove of that actually happening.
Also: please grow out of childish binary "good vs. evil" thinking! Just saying the CIA is telling bullshit does not imply in the slightest that China is the good guy here or in any other aspect.
I'm pretty leary about all the Huawei shit. Like, it literally started becoming a thing a few months after Trump started a trade war with China. The timing is suspicious. Not the behavior. The behavior is basically what I expect every government in every country with enough money to do it is doing. But the sudden PR swing against it feels like its probably generated to try and drum up anti-Chinese sentiment in the west.
[...]
Xi thanks you for going out on the shakiest limb so someone else doesnt have to.