I played about 13 hours of The Division 1 and while I enjoyed it, I felt a bit late to the party, having only started it 2 years ago. I also just bought The Division 2 which is just as fun but can you spot the differences?
These games look very similar, with no real leap in graphical quality over the first game.
The Christmas in New York setting is great in D1. Being from New York the recreation of my city is above average, even if they compress the hell out of certain areas.
I've only been to D.C. once, but it is a great location for the game and looks lovingly created. Having shootouts in historic museums is a lot of fun.
I'm only 3 hours into D2 but the story seems just as minimal as everyone suggests it is. At least in D1 we got radio DJs talking about the outbreak, and suggesting more was afoot.
The UI in D1 uses more overlays but it's very similar to D2.
I don't know about mission structure, so far D2 missions seem just as involved as the previous game. In your opinion are the missions more interested in D2 or D1?
These games look very similar, with no real leap in graphical quality over the first game.
The Christmas in New York setting is great in D1. Being from New York the recreation of my city is above average, even if they compress the hell out of certain areas.
I've only been to D.C. once, but it is a great location for the game and looks lovingly created. Having shootouts in historic museums is a lot of fun.
I'm only 3 hours into D2 but the story seems just as minimal as everyone suggests it is. At least in D1 we got radio DJs talking about the outbreak, and suggesting more was afoot.
The UI in D1 uses more overlays but it's very similar to D2.
I don't know about mission structure, so far D2 missions seem just as involved as the previous game. In your opinion are the missions more interested in D2 or D1?