Were all of those really as big of a jump though? I thought they were considered remasters. Especially SotC
No, those are remakes. A remaster is like RE4 HD, halo collection, cod4 remastered. Ratchet and clank is another remake priced at $40
It's a technique called miniature faking. It's emulating a tilt-shift lens. Miniature faking is an illusion caused by forcing a shallow DoF. Causes the viewer to read an image as miniature when it is not:
If you've played Link's Awakening... ever, then you know you definitely don't need to do that in this game. You'll be fine.
It is called tilt-shift, it is an effect used in photography to simulate that you are photographing a miniature.
You'd be wrong for sure. From what we've seen so far from this remake, it is just as substantial as the all three of the ones you mentioned. Unless LA adds new content it will be the exact situation because all three of those games completely redid the graphics and nothing else.
it was really short-lived. i think about a month or two? but in the time there were a lot of really excellent entries. if i had known it would have been such a big deal i would have planned things out better. the ulterior motive i had was that i was just starting to take some serious graphic design courses and i was needing practice. my own stuff was pretty bad in general. seeing how other people thought was pretty inspiring. mik was fantastic in particular.
also, everything was saved, at least.
more!
AlucarDeq
android18
Linkhero1
Linkzg
thegohn
orioto
sevenchaos
I know the game's not detailed. I'm just laying out why I hate depth of field and why it's a bad idea to take it from film and slap it on regular gameplay in a video game. It's not used with the same purpose as with film so the result is just 40% of the screen looking like a blurry mess for no good reason.
I see, maybe I would like it if I were into miniatures?It is called tilt-shift, it is an effect used in photography to simulate that you are photographing a miniature.
I do not know what others think. I personally find it cute and it fits perfectly with the "clayey" style of the textures.
The game being detailed or not isn't really what I'm talking about. You talk like you need to see everything on the screen or you'll be dying because it's such a fast-paced video game. This ain't a shmup. It's a 2D Zelda game. They're never that fast or involved, and LA is among the most chill of that category. If you don't like the way it looks, like... whatever. I can't help you. But if your issue is, as you put out, that you're concerned about it for gameplay reasons? I'm informing you that your concerns are absolutely unwarranted. Based on the trailer, it sure doesn't look like they've changed the game dramatically in such a way that would change this, either. There's absolutely nothing to worry about.
I didn't know I wanted this till now. Yoshida's chibi artstyle would look gorgeousFFT would look dope with this kind of art style. Imagine the graphics looking like a bunch of animated chess pieces.
I don't think people have issue with the artstyle direction, it's just a bit of the execution that could be adjusted, at least for me
It's just not fair. It's not impossible, mind you, but why is there a scenario for where I have to restart the battle all over again because of one bad step? It just rubs me the wrong
You're meant to notice the blurriness. It's a personal judgment whether or not you appreciate the effect. It's intentionally used to provide the sense that you're watching miniature figures in a miniature world.
FFT would look dope with this kind of art style. Imagine the graphics looking like a bunch of animated chess pieces.
I would love a Advanced Wars/Wargroove/FE game where all the units looked like table top miniatures. Fully animated of course. I've seen a few games that look like this but would like to see a big name take it on.
I really like it personally
FFT would look dope with this kind of art style. Imagine the graphics looking like a bunch of animated chess pieces.
There's quite a few people in this thread vocal about their dislike for the art style. Which is cool of course, just pointing it out.
I've already played the Gameboy version. I understand exactly what you're saying. I think you're the one misunderstanding my point. I was speaking about how people experience games vs movies in general. Focus in movies is meant to draw the eye to specific things at specific times as the director intended. Just making everything outside the center of the screen blurry doesn't serve that purpose. Since we're talking games you want a good reason to do things like obscuring the player's vision, because players need to be able to look wherever they want whenever they want in order to gather information about what's happening and play the game. The part you quoted was just talking about how people play video games on a fundamental level, not specifically with regard to this one.
Don't get me wrong, the narrative is still handled like every other Zelda game, but there's a twist that is pretty good and makes you think a little. Which is more than what can be said about most Zelda games haha.
I hope its far enough that they can still adjust the look to perfection
I don't see this as any different from changing the camera distance. Except this way you get to see more than if the camera was zoomed in. It still forces you to focus on the center, on Link, but has an extra flair on the outside.
I don't think it's all that uncommon for promotional footage to omit the HUD, though
