Hey hey, I was clearly joking.
Live action Toy Story would be an awful idea.
Can't be worse than this live action.
Hey hey, I was clearly joking.
Live action Toy Story would be an awful idea.
Pretty much.
Still amazed by just how sluggish and bland this looks next to the original.
I don't think that is the reason. In that sequence you had marching Hyena's by the hundreds in Nazi style. And I don't think that they could do this in this movie because they have gone for the realistic angle. So how would they do that sequence in this movie.It just would not work.
lol hey, man, I would rather take another Ant-man movie over a photorealistic CG remake of one of their animated movies.
I think the real question is, why choose an angle that doesn't work with the highlights of the source material
Exactly. That would be a thing of beauty. In my opinion they're wasting these studios by not trusting them with their well known franchises. Certain things like Cinderella or tarzan work with with the live action treatment, but something like dumbo should've been done in the style of tangled or zootopia.Man Id fuck with that. Imagine into the spiderverse visuals and colour pallet for different songs and settings etc with solid voice casting, damn
You're trying way too hard to break in to that Slayven/BronsonLee/Professor Beef hot take market.
You need to be able to see the actors in the characters. Its why Any Serkis is so good. Even in the cartoon you saw the actors in their characters. It helped humanize them. It just doesnt work here.
Then again it worked for Jungle Book so who knows.
You know what shit they should have dawn of the apes this movie so hard, that shit had emotions, great facial animations etc. Coild have given Serkis a hell of a payday because he prob could have mo capped everything and be every damn character in the movie as well minus female leadsYou need to be able to see the actors in the characters. Its why Any Serkis is so good. Even in the cartoon you saw the actors in their characters. It helped humanize them. It just doesnt work here.
Then again it worked for Jungle Book so who knows.
lol hey, man, I would rather take another Ant-man movie over a photorealistic CG remake of one of their animated movies.
Era said Pikachu will make a billion too.
Thats how it always is.Had a feeling all those early Twitter reactions were products of people psyched to have free tickets to a big movie.
Exactly what the first trailer looked like.Just read the GQ article and basically it's what people thought it would be, a beautiful but emotionless remake.
It seemed clear the approach that the movie would be going for after Jungle Book so I just can't understand the criticisms of the animals not being expressive enough or animated enough when usually those kinds of animations look even more out of place the more realistic it looks (see: Mowgli: Legend of the Jungle).
It's a stylistic choice that I can appreciate.But The Lion King is not accurate to real life animals so you better just watch a documentary
Those 30 minutes must be super inconsequentialHow is it even possible for this to feel like a strict, almost shot-for-shot remake when it's 30 minutes longer than the original!?
Will this reaction and Dumbo get Disney to reconsider this direction? Or they'll just say "Nah, we still got that Aladdin money."
...I'm looking forward to the new takes on Mulan and The Little Mermaid.