So people shouldn't criticize something if it's also bad another way and it makes money.Dude, it's going to make a billion.
And no, it would not make a billion if they tried to make something new.
Did you think this line of logic through?
So people shouldn't criticize something if it's also bad another way and it makes money.Dude, it's going to make a billion.
And no, it would not make a billion if they tried to make something new.
Why not? Right now it's only making money because of its title. Aladdin strays way off from the original (compared to TLK) and is also on its way to a billion, anyway. Favreau's own Jungle Book also did its own thing and grossed almost a billion dollars for that matter.Dude, it's going to make a billion.
And no, it would not make a billion if they tried to make something new.
When Pumbaa said "fart" at the end of the Hakuna Matata song, i thought that they will write the word "SEX" on the sky when Simba was imagining his father to complete the 20+ years memes of The Lion King 🤣
Here is an article about it if you don't know the story
LINK
I was fine with Scar's delivery for the most part, but this really sucked
Then there's making Scar obssessed with Sarabi like a loser. Jesus.
That's not why he was bitter though.I thoght that was well done and it made sense. He needed an heir to solidify his legacy (Which also makes sense between Lion prides) and also have the rest of the pride behind him so to speak.
Which is incidentally one of the few actual mistakes they made, as "baby Pumbaa" as shown in the movie isn't a warthog, but a completely different species of pig. Whoops.Can I just say that if anything worthwhile came from this remake, it's only baby Pumba 😊
Which is incidentally one of the few actual mistakes they made, as "baby Pumbaa" as shown in the movie isn't a warthog, but a completely different species of pig. Whoops.
True, I just think it's funny that they're so committed to making it as close as nature as possible, but then suddenly decide to change young Pumbaa to a completely different species of animal, just because he looks cuter that way.
People weren't kidding when they said they made Scar an incelThen there's making Scar obssessed with Sarabi like a loser. Jesus.
So people shouldn't criticize something if it's also bad another way and it makes money.
Did you think this line of logic through?
The movie will undoubtedly make money but certainly not as much as this project could have made had they aimed higher to create a Lion King for a new generation.[\quote]
... I'm going to mock takes like this which aren't thought through at all.
Both Pete's Dragon and Cinderella are my favourite live action Disney films, even if neither of them set the box office alight. I even enjoyed The Jungle Book too, given that the animals are animated and expressed in a somewhat cartoonish manner. Also helps that the songs are still a joy to listen to!
But this?
I thought Dumbo and Aladdin were just okay, the latter of which was mostly carried by Will Smith's Genie however, The Lion King is just a consistently average film — feels like watching those David Attenborough narrated BBC documentaries with the animals talking and/or singing.
It's a shame this did not resonate with any of the kids in my cinema showing either...
Regarding Donald Glover (voice actor for Simba). In my opinion he is a very talented, unique, and smart actor. He is famous for his laid back/low energy delivery and the (I don't care) attitude where his role in the show Atalanta is perfect for him. My point here is that I don't see him fit to do voice acting. His expressions and how he carries himself is his selling point.