I love the movies but I love this more everytime I watch it
This used to be one of my favorite trilogies ever but I revisited them recently and I found that they are boring, meandering, drawn out and self-indulgent.
This is a 10+ hour series that consists of endless roaming and travelling. The plot is stretched across three movies and nothing really "new" or interesting happens other than the fellowship travelling across Middle Earth and escaping the clutches of the "enemy." They travel, they fight, some characters live and some characters die. Armies clash, and clash again. Sméagol is good, smeagol is bad. Will he or won't he? How long did they draw this out? Did anyone really think he was going to turn out good? There are sequences that go on endlessly. Like Shelob. How long is that scene? Does PJ have to stretch out EVERY scene? There is so little narrative and plot that moments and scenes in this move are always stretched to the extreme. He also repeatedly employs the same framing device: the camera pushes in on an actor and then that actor narrates a scene or explains the plot. This happens with Gandalf, Saruman, Galadriel, Elrond, Faramir. Wash, rinse, repeat. If you watch the extended editions, this is even more egregious and almost impossible to get through. I think by the time I got to ROTK, the constant use of this same "device" just broke me. And then I had to sit through yet another battle of clashing CGI armies. And then yet another drawn out fight between Sam, Frodo and Sméagol for possession of the ring. Endless slow mo, endless fighting back and forth, push ins on Frodo's struggle with the power of the ring. Etc etc. I don't see any way this trilogy can justify its ultimate running time.
There's only one Return and it ain't of the King.
1 you were called these things because you said LOTR was derivative of game of thrones and a freaking video game, the Witcher. Let's not pretend that you didn't present a ridiculous, un—informed opinion.I created a thread on the first one and was called everything from an idiot to an alcoholic. I did finish watching all of them. Only second movie is kind of decent as a film.
The HUGE positive of watching extended editions of these films is that I learned to REALLY appreciate movies that are 2 hours or under!!! Movie watching is waaaay more enjoyable now.
The whole Back to the Future trilogy felt shorter than one LOTR. Also MUCH better trilogy. As is Planet of the Apes.
Not what I said at all. Have fun insulting me though. I'm sure it will make those movies better.1 you were called these things because you said LOTR was derivative of game of thrones and a freaking video game, the Witcher. Let's not pretend that you didn't present a ridiculous, un—informed opinion.
2 your third paragraph proves the point even further.
The books were way worse? The fuck you talking about. The books are literally some of thr best books written last century.Seriously, the books were way worse. But that is what he was adapting. Jackson gets shit for cutting out the most useless and meandering stuff still.
bull fucking shit, dude. bull. fucking. shit.Not what I said at all. Have fun insulting me though. I'm sure it will make those movies better.
It's more evidence that we recently diverged into the worst timeline.I dunno how people can't be captivated by these films, they are wonderful.
Do you really think that I didn't know that LOTR came out before Witcher 3??? What point are you even making? LOTR fans are the most defensive bunch of people I've ever encountered. Calm down, you can still enjoy your movie.bull fucking shit, dude. bull. fucking. shit.
it is what you said to the point you had to go back to your OP and edit in that you saw GOT and played the witcher first so while technically they're not derivative thats how they feel derivative.
where did i insult you in my previous post?
do us all a favor and save us from your review of the Godfather, a movie isn't good or bad because of its length, i feel like this shouldn't have to be explained, but alas some people have the attention span of a gnat. There, now i've insulted your attention span.
I hate the movies as adaptations, but I can still say that they are triumphs of film. Just watch the behind the scenes stuff. The amount of effort, attention, and love that was poured into them is incredible.
BUT OF COURSE PJ HAD TO MAKE LEGOLAS SURF DOWN THE FUCKING STAIRS AND COMPLETELY CHANGED FARAMIR.
edit: oh wait, I can kind of see how you'd find them long and boring
"You bow to no one"
*tears flow*
Sorry, but I can't get down with this, OP.
Has nothing to do with younger generation. The trilogy is boring. It wasn't that noticable back in the day as you only watched one movie but when watching all three right after another, it really shows. Especially the CGI fights really drag it down. Still, the beginning of the first movie will always be excellent.Yeah, these threads are one of the first times in my life where I wanted to smack younger generations for not appreciating good things. Like, goddamn, people really don't have any attention span these days.
Ugh. Get off my lawn.
I think that scene and Gandalf's fall gets me the most choked up in the trilogy.