Sorry, explain the Bronson/lux part to me? I think I'm misunderstanding your point.Because regardless of how you feel about my actions there is no motive to do them as scum.
Grizzly was lead before I started swapping and was the lynch. I didn't actually change the outcome, was the final vote, didn't tie, have no reason to have wanted to tie, didn't protect anyone.
What I did do is shake bronson from the third train onto lux and not grizzly, so we know he didn't jump into to save a scum and is probably town.
That should be the main takeaway from last night
Oops yeah. I hate this draft saving crap.that quote kinda screwed up, is what you typed under Kitsune's post in that?
Like I said, it's mostly gut. But my vote was on Dubs initially when he called out Zipped when we were relatively early on in the "why would we pick the teal room early" discussion. I don't know why it stood out to me.hey Hecht, what pushed you to considering a B-Dub lynch on the first day compared to today?
However, of these players, I imagine there are multiple scum in there.Godfather unfortunately, it looks like melon was the only one that didn't vote for one of the main suspects yesterday. Lux and Stuart are the ones that stayed on SaucyKaz, whereas Dubs, saenima, Muffin, and Kopite stayed on you rather than the two leaders at the end.
i need to look back at that whole mess when i get the chance, I'm mostly looking through the end day stuffBut my vote was on Dubs initially when he called out Zipped when we were relatively early on in the "why would we pick the teal room early" discussion.
So right now:
BronsonLee - leaning townish but i still think he's hiding a bit behind the goofs. Would read scummier if more experienced.
You always got people to talk to man! Be safe.Now that we've established that the room mechanics are very real and not just flavor text, I'm gonna have to backtrack and take a look at everyone who shrugged them off as flavor text.
It is. Scariest part is at my lowest points I could see something like that happening to me.
I know they arnt synonymous, you just managed to do both,
going from scum "striking" to " they use chaos for cover" are two very differant idea to me.
Never mind, I sort of take your point. Logically, Bronson and lux are probably not both scum. Unless they were bussing lux(which is stupid as hell day 1)he would have voted grizzly over lux. There is a chance they're both town, but I'm not really buying that yet.Sorry, explain the Bronson/lux part to me? I think I'm misunderstanding your point.
I have a feeling there's more than a few scum on Grizz. He went from 3 votes to 9 in a matter of minutes for no reason.That we aren't looking there is crazy to me. Why did everyone jump on Grizz? How is this not the question we're asking?
I will be absolutely shocked if there's no scum on that Grizz vote.Yeah I'm real goddamn curious at the vote jump there
Hell the only reason I pulled my vote is because it was gonna tie and ties are useless
I have a feeling there's more than a few scum on Grizz. He went from 3 votes to 9 in a matter of minutes for no reason.That we aren't looking there is crazy to me. Why did everyone jump on Grizz? How is this not the question we're asking?
Can you honestly not see the differences between the two?(and frankly it's extremely arrogant to frame "hey we have different understandings of this word as it was used" and "you didn't use these words exactly as i personally understood them" as a scumtell or backtracking )
Can you honestly not see the differences between the two?
'Scum using this moment to strike' carrys way more serious connotations than what you ended up describing.
This isnt about definitions, your initial idea and how you elaborated on it were just two differant situations, the later being far less imposing than the former.
They're not two different situations. They're me trying to better articulate my thoughts. If you move under the cover of chaos, to me that is "striking". You're trying to decouple the two for whatever reason but for me they're part and parcel of me trying to communicate my thoughts. Because that's how language works.
He was on godfather, jumped in to break the tie onto lux. So he wasn't scum protecting anyone and as scum he had no real reason to do anything at all. Lux doesn't particularly have anything to do with itSorry, explain the Bronson/lux part to me? I think I'm misunderstanding your point.
Remember that time kitsunelaine called me emotional?
I remember.
Oh shit you dont know eiether?
if i recall correctly i was very miffed at thiscontrary to what FEP says, it sure looks like he was the deciding vote between Lux and Grizzly RE: who got lynched
?contrary to what FEP says, it sure looks like he was the deciding vote between Lux and Grizzly RE: who got lynched
Oh shit you dont know eiether?
At this point we are way off the reason i even started this ehole discussion.
So your defintion of striking does not actually require any kind of strike to be made?They're not two different situations. They're me trying to better articulate my thoughts. If you move under the cover of chaos, to me that is "striking". You're trying to decouple the two for whatever reason but for me they're part and parcel of me trying to communicate my thoughts. Because that's how language works.
So your defintion of striking does not actually require any kind of strike to be made?
Like a strike is to attack someone, mafia striking would be them like killing a player.
Grizzly was lead before I started swapping and was the lynch. I didn't actually change the outcome
Well at first i just wanted to know what you meant by scum somehow striking at people during the days end chaos but now i think we liyerally have two differant definitions of the wordi've completely forgotten what that even was so you'll have to go back and remind me
No.