I'm fine with this as long as we get a steamy Thor/Darcy aftercredits love scene to make up for it
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Marvel Cinematic Universe | We had a good run, and now it's over
- Thread starter Deleted member 1248
- Start date
- Status
I'm fine with this as long as we get a steamy Thor/Darcy aftercredits love scene to make up for it
fingers crossed these madmen saved some megatons for the next show taking place a month later
Oh man!
fingers crossed these madmen saved some megatons for the next show taking place a month later
OH MAN!
It's not really fair to call it a venom verse. Venom was the first to be released of Sony's Universe of Marvel Characters. They're developing an animated and separate live action adaptations of Silk, so they won't be shy from using Spider-powered individuals.
It also makes a lot of sense. Every other film and TV studio is searching through their IP library to create successful reboots/relaunches of prized content (CBS going in on Star Trek, Viacom leveraging Nickelodeon IP, Warner utilizing Cartoon Network, HBO and Turner's catalogue, Universal with Fast spin-offs). Sony is doing the same (leveraging PlayStation through PlayStation Productions which has 5 projects in development, Sony Music working with Sony Pictures to develop biopics and Cinderella starring Camila Cabello) and it'd be really unintelligent for Sony to not capitalize on their largest IP.
Tony Vinciquerra a few months back stated they have the next 7-8 years of Spider-Man related content planned across film and TV (with Lord and Miller handling all animated TV productions).
Spider-Man is blessed with a large rogue of characters that there are a horde to include in MCU films.
You know I've been thinking, with movies and now TV shows on regular rotation we'll always have something new to talk about, all year long.
Let this be the last big draught.
Loved her energy on stage. Hopefully it translates to the role as well.
This is my point - call it what you want - this separate Marvel universe makes Sony execs happy, but for everyone else, it just means some legendary Marvel character interactions have a low probability of ever happening.
Of course it makes sense for them to do this... They are attempting to maximize the return on their investment.
At the panel they showed some scenes with the Ten Rings in them. One of the guys buying the Yellowjacket particles was indeed a Ten Rings mercenary, he had a tattoo on his neck.
According to this new article by Deadline, Kevin Feige now has control of every Marvel property, including Deadpool.
I guess that's technically true since they have a good chunk of creative control over Spider-Man.
I think the biggest news here is Deadpool going to Feige, since that some thought that Deadpool would stay at Fox, cause Marvel Studios wouldn't do R Rated films.
I guess they can use Marvel MAX as the branding for Deadpool if they want to make it distinct from their other works while keeping it in the MCU.
If Blade ends up being rated R will give us a good idea on how they'll handle Deadpool.
Marvel Studios just said Fall 2020, so I'm assuming Sep/Oct.
Assume status quo until you hear otherwise from a reliable source.
Not sure but for now I'd guess so. Marvel's never made a move about Hulk or his supporting cast in live action tv after this contract with Universal.
Even if Disney can make Hulk as tv series, a series where you need cg character for most of the screen time would have been really expensive
I believe Universal only has the rights of first refusal to live action Hulk (and family) movies. I even question if they own anything on Namor, I don't even know where that started.
Regarding Live Action TV rights, ABC was rumored to be developing it in 2010 and 2012:
So if that's true, then they can make a Hulk, She-Hulk and whatever else they want on TV without having to deal with Comcast.
Reason Universal owns Hulk movie RoFR, apparently, is because they were part of the team who loaned Marvel Studios money to get started.
They lost the production rights when they failed to make a sequel to Ang Lee's Hulk. Disney bought Paramount out of their distribution rights.
I'm assuming you can get around that by spending some of the time as Bruce. If Marvel wants to do it, they can.
I mean while Hawkeye is probably not CGI heavy, Loki and Falcon/Winter Solider can be. I have to think WandaVision is CGI heavy. Maybe not as much as Hulk would be, but heavy enough if they are going to keep the same quality as the movies. I guess that's a reason these shows will be expensive. The Mandalorian clocks in at $15MM per episode. Marvel shows can command that much. Feige has the clout and reputation to ask for that....and he would get it.
Cool thing is they can do a Hulk origin (I personally would like it since we never got one in the MCU. Would also help keep the costs down) or something else (hopefully not World War Hulk or The Immortal Hulk). And you know what else would be cool in a Hulk live action origin TV show? Wolverine's introduction. And they could also have a kickass She-Hulk TV show.
Last edited:
re: Namor, the sense I've gotten reading between the lines of Feige's past responses is that while Universal can't use him on their own, they have/had some sort of significant contractually mandated participation in anything Marvel Studios might do with the character, which is a different situation from the Hulk, where that only applies to solo films.
Mind you, I could have been misinterpreting it, and it's possible the rights have changed since then.
Just watched the video now, as an even older Asian American(or should I say North American) man I know his pain and I love his response. I already knew of him from Kim's Convenience and a Youtube series with a focus on Asian Americans but he didn't cross my mind when it came to his role. Probably because he hadn't been in any big movies yet. But I'm really glad he got the role and I love that he isn't afraid to shy away from these topics and wants to be a voice for change.
I can't lie, Multiverse of Madness is my most anticipated Phase 4 movie. But Shang Chi is definitely number 2 and I can't wait to see the 1st trailer for this movie. Now get my man a superhero suit and super powers please lol.
I guess I found my own answer when looking for it and Feige did mention Universal once. This is what I found that he said.
2018:
2014:
2013:
No one knows for sure what Universal has/had and what changed.
Nah, just go straight to season 3 and forget there's any other Netflix shows.
Read a brief summary of The Defenders, since Daredevil S3 picks up where that series left.
Hell, he may not even have to do that, it might've been covered in like the first 5 minutes of the season and then moved on
This may be somewhat of a controversial opinion but I don't think that an R rating is that important for Deadpool.
I don't think it's necessary, but it definitely helped the character stand out amongst the rest of the Marvel movies being released. His two R-rated movies were not only great, but they made a shit load of money, so for that reason alone I see them sticking with the rating. When it comes to Deadpool joining the MCU, he is also joining a universe that isn't lacking in comedic PG-13 movies (unlike the Fox MCU), so I'd argue Deadpool needs that R-rating more than ever now just to keep that uniqueness.
Of course, should Deadpool pop up in another MCU film, he'll have to conform to the PG-13 rating, and in those situations the jokes write themselves (and obviously the character can, in fact, work just fine in PG-13)
That's a very good point. So you think that Marvel Studios will create a separate R-rated brand or will Deadpool still use Fox branding?
- Status