Yeah no duh. It will be up later today.
People are running to destroy their legacy and reputation for Trump. That is what confuses me.
For what goal? What will impeachment in the house accomplish? Senate won't do it and all it will do is push against the democrats by making this report become spun even more as a partisan witchhunt. The hope for impeachment required collusion to get the Senate on board. A lack of that and no definitive position on obstruction kills this off.
Republicans have already shown how poorly a one-sided impeachment can go politically.
Some of you need to think a bit more logically about how this all plays out.
People are running to destroy their legacy and reputation for Trump. That is what confuses me.
Barr fucked up using the same move twice. No one was buying the spin the second time.
Yeah no duh. It will be up later today.
But the fact that a special counsel team didn't feel the need to even SUGGEST to bring those charges is very telling. They are much more neutral than 99% of Era who would just impeach the guy because they don't like his policies.
Let me be clear, I think Trump is awful and should have been impeached just for his conduct alone. But that won't be impeachable.
Yeah no duh. It will be up later today.
But the fact that a special counsel team didn't feel the need to even SUGGEST to bring those charges is very telling. They are much more neutral than 99% of Era who would just impeach the guy because they don't like his policies.
Let me be clear, I think Trump is awful and should have been impeached just for his conduct alone. But that won't be impeachable.
Why? There is absolutely nothing there that isn't possible, if not likely. There are grounds for impeaching both -- sure, it won't be convicted by the Senate, but the House could (and should) be considering doing it.
Expecting Mueller to say anything other than what is contained in his report is just creating another media circus when all he will do is refer to his report and DOJ guidelines.
Nadler will try and get him to take a position which it is clear he believes he cannot take or he would have done so in the report.
Yeah no duh. It will be up later today.
But the fact that a special counsel team didn't feel the need to even SUGGEST to bring those charges is very telling. They are much more neutral than 99% of Era who would just impeach the guy because they don't like his policies.
Let me be clear, I think Trump is awful and should have been impeached just for his conduct alone. But that won't be impeachable.
Is there a timestamp for this? Someone at work asked me stuff and I missed this.
But the fact that a special counsel team didn't feel the need to even SUGGEST to bring those charges is very telling.
There is a thing called accountability. Even if he doesn't go to jail there is still information the American people deserve to have.I still have no idea why people are waiting with bated breath for this report as if 1) it's going to change their opinion on his multiple crimes, 2) it's going to change anyone in Washington's mind on his multiple crimes, or 3) it's somehow the one dealbreaker in a presidency with near-daily scandals. Like, yeah that Michael Tracey tweet is wack but we really are not that far from turning the mystical Mueller report into some bombshell conspiracy
And lost the house.
There is a thing called accountability. Even if he doesn't go to jail there is still information the American people deserve to have.
Why? There is absolutely nothing there that isn't possible, if not likely. There are grounds for impeaching both -- sure, it won't be convicted by the Senate, but the House could (and should) be considering doing it.
Edit: The only thing that isn't going to happen is a full release of the report publicly as I'm sure it'd impact ongoing investigations, but there is no reason that it shouldn't be released, non-redacted, to appropriate members of Congress. It's the law.
Playing Every Breath You Take now...is this in the room or just on the stream?I... why is the WaPo livestream playing Somewhere Over the Rainbow?
This is a fair take but liberals all over are acting like this is the make-or-break Watergate moment for Trump. (It's not.)
Citing Clinton's impeachment ignores the fundamental difference of having a sitting President going through impeachment proceedings -- including daily news coverage, public testimony, etc. -- during a Presidential re-election year.
Comparing Bill Clinton, going into the midterm elections of his second and final term as President, to a President going into his own re-election with himself on the ballot, is foolish.
And the above is just looking at this from the abominable Game of Politics standpoint, where people fancy themselves some combination of pundit + Littlefinger + Bismarck. Rule of law and accountability and the Constitutional fucking order should take precedent over either party's political machinations.
It's in the room. Doesn't sound like it's overlayed audio.Playing Every Breath You Take now...is this in the room or just on the stream?
Its not helping his re-election chances that's for sure.This is a fair take but liberals all over are acting like this is the make-or-break Watergate moment for Trump. (It's not.)
Full report wont be released because it has grand jury secrets. Mueller will go in front of congress and say he cannot answer because of DOJ policy. Trump's taxes will have shady info in them, but no smoking gun. No prosecutor will go forwards with indictment of a president and having the House start impeachment will backfire.
Not me. I simply saw how effective the Ben Gotzi and Buttery Males capers were and I'm trying to give them a taste of their own medicine to help get Dems and some progressives in.
Playing Every Breath You Take now...is this in the room or just on the stream?
MSNBC just said congress gets it in 9 minutes
Yeah, but that's not what you said. It is likely that the full report will be released to appropriate members of Congress, in full. It is likely that Trump's returns will be released to Congress, in full. It is possible that impeachment against Barr could occur. It is likely that impeachment against Trump will happen. None of that is fantasy land. Now maybe the idea that any of this will work (or at least not backfire) may be, but that's not what your original post was about.Full report wont be released because it has grand jury secrets. Mueller will go in front of congress and say he cannot answer because of DOJ policy. Trump's taxes will have shady info in them, but no smoking gun. No prosecutor will go forwards with indictment of a president and having the House start impeachment will backfire.
It's a problem that it isn't. Presidents have gotten far worse repercussions for less. There's no accountability for what politicians do, and to say this isn't a make-or-break watergate moment just shows how shitty this state of affairs has become.This is a fair take but liberals all over are acting like this is the make-or-break Watergate moment for Trump. (It's not.)
At minimum the full report should be released to the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees.
The tax returns are part of the larger picture.
If things in the report are as-described by Barr (10 possible instances of obstruction) then we're past the point of waffling over impeachment. It becomes a matter of obligation.
Yeah, but that's not what you said. It is likely that the full report will be released to appropriate members of Congress, in full. It is likely that Trump's returns will be released to Congress, in full. It is possible that impeachment against Barr could occur. It is likely that impeachment against Trump will happen. None of that is fantasy land. Now maybe the idea that any of this will work (or at least not backfire) may be, but that's not what your original post was about.
At minimum the full report should be released to the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees.
The tax returns are part of the larger picture.
If things in the report are as-described by Barr (10 possible instances of obstruction) then we're past the point of waffling over impeachment. It becomes a matter of obligation.