-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
The Mueller Report (with redactions by AG Barr) will be released on Thursday according to the Justice Department
- Thread starter ElectricBlanketFire
- Start date
- Status
It's juat going to lead to the full report being asked to be revealed and i don't see it isn't after this.
The _____________________________ and ___________________. Also ___________________. Therefor _______________________ because __________________________ and ________________. Then ________________ at _____________________.
The president is ______ innocent!
The president is ______ innocent!
Is this the report the white house had access too to make redactions? If so, is there any reason to doubt that they won't use their redactions to prevent such a state of affairs?
No idea what they'll try to do. But the length and detail expected in the report should make it pretty straightforward to know if they're redacting things that aren't grand jury related or classified.
How useful would be an X-Men mutant who could read redacted material? Such a useless power but any good writer could make it work....
Why are folks assuming that there will be large blocks of redactions, rather than just a blank page with *redacted* on it. We'll get the full report when it leaks from the House or Mueller's office, not before
OP
OP
Assuming someone did and was found out, what would be the penalty?
I fully expect machine learning AI to be able to decipher redacted documentation with a shocking degree of accuracy within the next 5 years, based on common legal terms, sentence structure, use of monospaced fonts and the surrounding text.
Not good. That's why it won't leak until it makes its way to a bunch of House members' offices, so there is more plausible deniability once it does leak
"peripheral third parties" is an interesting way of saying Trump and family.
This. Best for people to read the report first and then point out specific pieces to dig into rather than making a blanket "unredact everything"-request. There's no way Mueller's team is ever gonna leak a report that contains stuff that's truly confidential rather than inconvenient.
Another ploy to give Dems another L by redacting anything of substance and reiterate that the president was vindicated and cleared of any wrongdoing. Farce extended.
"anything that would 'unduly infringe on the personal privacy and reputational interests of peripheral third parties.'"
So anything involving anyone in Trump's orbit, then.
So anything involving anyone in Trump's orbit, then.
If they just redact names and stuff but some juicy details that would suffice. If they start blanking our paragraphs of detail that isn't ongoing investigations that will be a joke. I think even the Mueller team have redacted what they think is right anyway so go by them, no excuse not to.
Trump did crooked stuff with third party who are also crooks, leave them alone because you shouldn't know someone is a crook because they might loose crook business and harm their nice fronted business that does crooked stuff.
Does it mean that?
OP
OP
@realDonaldTrump The Mueller Report, which was written by 18 Angry Democrats who also happen to be Trump Haters (and Clinton Supporters), should have focused on the people who SPIED on my 2016 Campaign, and others who fabricated the whole Russia Hoax. That is, never forget, the crime.....
@realDonaldTrump ....Since there was no Collusion, why was there an Investigation in the first place! Answer - Dirty Cops, Dems and Crooked Hillary!
That they'll redact things that "unduly infringe on the reputation" of those involved means this thing isn't what we really want. This will be laundered and spun just like the initial Barr summary.
Anything that personally mentions Trump and his family will be blacked out. Of course we'll be able to piece together who some of the redacted names are but the full, unedited version still neends to be seen.
Anything that personally mentions Trump and his family will be blacked out. Of course we'll be able to piece together who some of the redacted names are but the full, unedited version still neends to be seen.
Barr explicitly said this type of redaction would not apply to anyone in public office.
You saw what happened to Assange. You think anybody will want to leak this knowing this administration will do anything in their power to apprehend said leaker?
Dictator Trump is never going to walk away from this unscathed with the number of charged and convicted for collusion with Russia criminals from various levels of contact with him including the upper echelon of his campaign organization.
Even what we DO know that is possibly in Trump's favor doesn't reinforce THIS narrative. Good grief...
OP
OP
I'm getting tired of Democrats cooking up hoaxes that never go anywhere.
What did he testify to Congress about? Can you please elaborate how it will be obvious that he lied if, for example, he blacks out certain information that he did not provide to Congress, since he did not give the entire report to Congress?
Why do you believe he behaved in good faith to Congress given the massive nature of the report?
*edit*
I also notice you didn't answer the question. If I may ask again, do you personally trust Barr's word at face value?
Sooooo....the report that totally exonerates him needs to be countered by his team with a counter-report, huh??
HMMMMM....
- Status