LOL. Are you seriously asking Nintendo to price one of their most important games of the year less than $60?
So literally half the battles then.
It's obviously going to have better graphics, the Pokemon models are future-proofed so that they can be reused and look nicer every technological leap. Also, SuMo already had cutscenes.
XY had them
Probably isn't too much to ask for given he's literally comparing RDR2 and a Yellow remake with slightly more content that Yellow itself.
just look at other RPGs on the system. they have much wider open vistas and display more technical prowess. the 3DS's screen might have did those games a disservice, but it shows that the hardware behind them wasn't what was limiting Game Freak but their own ambitions and lack of technical experience
I'd say making a meaningful evolution to the formula, which I guess to an extent you could say Sun and Moon tried to do with its emphasis on story, but I'd say in large part it failed to meaningfully differentiate itself from X/Y other than being a much more linear experience and replacing gyms with totem challenges (which weren't really all that different) it seemed like a largely iterative entry.
only on mobile. now that they're on a console, they'll have to move in ways they never have before. we aren't talking about 3D Land or OoT3D/ALBW here, but Mario Odyssey, Breath of the Wild, and Xenoblade 2. it's a big test for Game Freak, so I hope they can bring it
I'm not talking about budget. I'm talking about how Pokemon now has to match the increased scale of nintendo games on teh switch*.
That's such an exaggeration its hardly funny.
...so even though you admit that Pokémon was more entertaining, you're seriously arguing that it should be priced less just because it doesn't have hyper-realistic 3D graphics? Seriously?
I'm not talking about budget. I'm talking about how Pokemon now has to match the increased scale of nintendo games on teh switch*.
in handheld terms, Zelda has gone from
to
now I'm not expecting pokemon to go open world (yet), but I'm expecting something more than just "SM but in HD"
*well it doesn't have to, but when Pokemon will be $60 like Zelda and Xenoblade, a perception will inevitably be created
EDIT: lol, I just realized I used a Wii U shot. whatever, the game looks the same
They can release an enhanced edition of a game and then the remake without the enhancement. GF can do anything.
What's so surprising? Celeste is my GotY but I wouldn't even touch it if it was $60. Price is porportional to cost, not fun.
Lmaooooo shutup
Content wise sure. But I've never seen a developer do a double back on their presentation between two titles releasing so closely together. Surely TOWN has a lower budget than the next Pokemon.
I never tried to imply Let's Go is ambitious, but like any other series there are entries that are ambitious and entries who are smaller and less important and who don't affect one another.
Nobody cares about grimdark sonic shit. You have a wild imagination to think technical soundness and being Shadow the hedgehog are directly tied together, Yokai Watch has a so much nicer presentation going for it so why does Pokemon struggle with too many pokemon on screen when they must have better resources at hand.
12 year olds make these sort of excuses,when you are only aware of two things existing, the one thing you like and the one thing you don't, and everything else is a non-factor. All the bad is dumb sonic games and any complaint against the thing you do like.
