Honestly, I just wanted an excuse to post an Agent Cooper gif.Fuck no. I will NOT stop using a 100 year old sign because of alt right idiots.
Honestly, I just wanted an excuse to post an Agent Cooper gif.Fuck no. I will NOT stop using a 100 year old sign because of alt right idiots.
They haven't.
They use it, to be sure, but when you see someone give you the OK hand sign... consider why they're doing it. Did you just ask them a question and the person you're asking cannot respond verbally but instead has used a hand signal to express that they agree? NOT A NAZI
It's an intra-group hand signal that is tantamount to a wink to like minded people. No on is saying it's like a Nazi salute, because this is way more devious than such an outward and uncommon gesture. And they have people do free PR and insist it isn't a thing, the "Alt-right" truly understand the current state of the Internet better than so many other groups.
I'm pretty sure it's so often seen in that form because these people know they're around people who might possibly clock the intended meaning, so they're trying to be cagey about it
or just low-key hide it in a pic so it's funnier when their in group notices it.
The funny thing about choosing the OK symbol is that, yeah, Americans generally see it as an innocuous thing so co-opting it is good for a troll, but it's also almost never the type of thing you'd randomly throw up in a posed photo. Like, you almost only ever see it when you're eating something and another person asks you if it's good. Mouth full, throw out OK. There simply aren't many good reasons to pose in a photo with nothing to react to with that symbol out.
I think they intuitively get that, if not logically consider it. So they throw it low, to make it more like an easter egg. Because even if this troll attempt wasn't going on, any normal person might ask "why are you throwing up the OK in this picture with nothing going on?"
*gasp*
Like, I don't know what else to tell you, you were wrong about the definition of co-opt.
You were wrong. I don't know why you've been so hot to make it seem like you weren't.
How is their using of the ok sign in any way devious? It's tantamount to a virtue signal, everyone knows when a nazi's doing it to be a nazi. It's like instead of whispering "hail hydra" they're yelling it everytime they hug.
You're so incredibly petty for trying to spin this, but this is what you often do.
Let's drop it.
It's devious because they are nazis masquerading as normal people? Have yo uever heard of the concept of a dog whistle?
How are you going to stop them from "taking ownership of it"? By using it randomly and insisting that it's not used in the same way while an organized group of people have in fact co-opted it for a specific use that they continue en-masse to do?This is pepe all over again. It's only bad if you let them take ownership of it.
Don't. Just keep using it like you normally would.
I use it daily to communicate to people across my warehouse, I don't understand how you can come up with this conclusion if you're somebody that leaves the house routinely tbh.It's such a weird hand gesture in the first place. Try to think of the last time you saw someone actually use it - you can't. It's for total dorks and MAGA chuds.
This sign has been used for decades. It's totally fine to still use.
Basically this. If anything, this is why the attempted trolling failed: it's rarely used in a normal context, let alone held up for a photo, and it's really easy to form a pattern when the only people using it consistently are MAGA shitheads.
So these guys have started throwing it down by their leg and in larger group shots in order to be more subtle, but you can only be so subtle with a hand gesture while keeping it visible (and it has to be visible - the whole point is to dog-whistle, and you can't do that if you can't see it), and it's become another pattern that's become easy to look for.
I use it daily to communicate to people across my warehouse, I don't understand how you can come up with this conclusion if you're somebody that leaves the house routinely tbh.
You know what, hold the fuck up. I looked up the actual dictionary definition of "co-opt" which is:
As you can see, one of them is "take over" so take your pedantic bullshit and kindly stop assuming that I'm arguing in bad faith.
Also, some small number of people on this board are VERY CLEARLY paranoid.
What's the masquerade part though?
Has anyone normal actually thrown up the ok hand sign and anyone been confused?
Like, every time you see it you can correctly categorize it as either "the ok hand sign" or "a nazi using the ok hand sign".
The only time that I've ever even had a question was when that one lady was doing it behind Kavanagh.
If I remember correctly, you are the same individual who derailed another thread arguing that Trump's detention centers for kids were not actually concentration camps and that should not be called that.
It is good to see a fervent defense of semantics in ERA.
So now this is probably not the case with that kid considering the context of the photo but I remember that being some dumb high-school game (graduated 07). You were suppose to get other people to look down at your waist while making that symbol. Never got the point of it (I was not a popular kid) but it defiantly was not a white power thing. Other adults my age have done the same thing every now and then and are doing it as that same game thing. I never even saw it as and ok symbol just making an o shape.
I believe you, but you honestly look at that picture and think "Maybe it was just a game?"
That kid is clearly wanting to tell the world "I'M A NAZI" but in a memey way.
If I remember correctly, you are the same individual who derailed another thread arguing that Trump's detention centers for kids were not actually concentration camps and that should not be called that.
It is good to see a fervent defense of semantics in ERA.
If I remember correctly, you are the same individual who derailed another thread arguing that Trump's detention centers for kids were not actually concentration camps and that should not be called that.
It is good to see a fervent defense of semantics in ERA.
I'm doing god's work. Besides, astro started it by bizarrely stating an incorrect definition of co-opt.
I.
Check the context. The OK symbol originated as an alt right code symbol after a Feb 2017 4chan post and then popularised by Trump's mannerisms. It first started as a way to gaslight leftists so people think leftists are crazy with what may seem like a conspiracy theory but then alt right started using it seriously.So today I learned that the 'OK' hand signal has been somehow co-opted and is a troll-y white power symbol. I just taught this symbol to my 5 year old and 7 year old the other day unaware of any alternative meaning. Seemingly it was started as a 'fake' symbol to troll people and has now become a genuine symbol of hate.
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/09/18/ok-sign-white-power-symbol-or-just-right-wing-troll
Should I teach my kids not to make that sign, or are people smart enough to figure out that in the absence of any other indications it just means 'OK'?
Wierd how it keeps popping up, right?
<
At least they have people like you to do PR for them
I believe you, but you honestly look at that picture and think "Maybe it was just a game?"
So now this is probably not the case with that kid considering the context of the photo
Ya, it's weird that a kid in the middle of a bunch of people doing nazi salutes is doing the ok hand signal and everyone is confused "is the kid a nazi?" they're all asking "or did someone out of frame just ask him something and he's signalling to them the affirmative" it will forever remain a mystery damn those nazis
Thanks for an example as to why co-opting a symbol works beautifully as a dog whistle.
You think all those kids are literal nazis, except the kid flashing the "not" white power sign? I am saying that you need to be an idiot to overlook it, especially in this group photo.
I hear you, well it's not the first time that god's work is used in order to start bad faith arguments. I'm looking forward more semantics from you in other threads related to Trump, Alt-right , racism or nazis. Will be really illuminating i'm sure.
You got me, I'm actually secretly an alt-right Trump agent who hid for nearly a decade on the internet arguing for social justice just so I could wait for this moment in time to correct the definition of "co-opt" in a secret attempt to further the agenda of nazi operatives who want to use the "ok" hand sign as a secret way to signal each other.
If I'm not mistaken the 'white power' gesture is the three fingers as the w and the circle and arm as the p, so holding it down like that one dude did was more of the "circle game" than anything.
Check the context. The OK symbol originated as an alt right code symbol after a Feb 2017 4chan post and then popularised by Trump's mannerisms. It first started as a way to gaslight leftists so people think leftists are crazy with what may seem like a conspiracy theory but then alt right started using it seriously.
You should watch the Contrapoints video on this, btw. Ive timestamped it so the video starts with the relevant segment on symbols.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/co-opt
1.2 Adopt (an idea or policy) for one's own use.
'the green parties have had most of their ideas co-opted by bigger parties'
Thing is, not every nazi understands this themselves, so many will have adopted it without understanding this and literally do use it as a wp symbol.The whole "it means white power" thing is a bogus attempt by the mainstream to rationalize what the symbol could mean. The whole point is that the symbol is completely meaningless, an innocuous hand gesture that they could "trick" liberals into freaking out about.
This post explains it a lot better:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/co-opt
a: to take into a group (such as a faction, movement, or culture) : ABSORB, ASSIMILATE
"The students are co-opted by a system they serve even in their struggle against it."— A. C. Danto
b: TAKE OVER, APPROPRIATE
"a style co-opted by advertisers"
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/co-opt
a: to take into a group (such as a faction, movement, or culture) : ABSORB, ASSIMILATE
"The students are co-opted by a system they serve even in their struggle against it."— A. C. Danto
b: TAKE OVER, APPROPRIATE
"a style co-opted by advertisers"
You know what, hold the fuck up. I looked up the actual dictionary definition of "co-opt" which is:
As you can see, one of them is "take over" so take your pedantic bullshit and kindly stop assuming that I'm arguing in bad faith.
Also, some small number of people on this board are VERY CLEARLY paranoid.