• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
SSD Guide
  • OP
    OP
    Crazymoogle

    Crazymoogle

    Game Developer
    Verified
    Oct 25, 2017
    2,884
    Asia
    SSD Guide
    Modern PC SSDs have a few specs you need to be aware of before you purchase. (Don't worry, it's easier than it sounds!)
    • INTERFACE: SATA (old), NVMe (new)
    • SIZE: 3.5" (big), 2.5", M.2 (tiny)
    • FLASH: QLC (slow/cheap), TLC, SLC (fast/expensive)
    • CACHE: Does it have its own RAM?
    Q: Can my PC use an SSD?
    As long as it's not 15+ years old, yes. Every motherboard today has "SATA" ports, which are basically data plugs meant for hard drives. Worse case, you can buy an SSD supporting that plug. Even the PlayStation 4 supports SSDs using this method.

    If you absolutely want an M.2 NVMe because it's awesome/small/fast, but don't have the slot, you can buy an M.2 adapter card that plugs into any PCIe 3.0/4.0 slot. This will allow you to add 1-2 M.2 NVMe drives of your choosing. (But usually this cannot be booted from.)

    Q: What size of SSD should I buy?
    For this, you need to look at the website or manual of your motherboard because there are a few specs out there:
    • SATA (2.5"): As I said above, you undoubtedly have a SATA port. If your case has a spot to install a 2.5" drive, that means you can buy a 2.5" SSD. It's the slowest and oldest of SSDs, but it does work. Just remember you need to have a SATA cable and a SATA power cable for it to work.

    • M.2 (SATA): Most motherboards in the last 5 years (or more) support M.2, a tiny standard where the SSD is so small it's literally a stick that plugs into the motherboard. No cables. The older M.2 slots still use SATA, meaning if you plug in an M.2 SATA drive, one of your SATA ports will be disabled.

    • M.2 (NVMe): The modern standard. NVMe is a protocol specifically for SSDs that communicates as if it's a PCIe card. NVMe cards are easily the fastest, and this is the protocol used by PS5/XSX. M.2 cards do require a tiny standoff and screw, which should come with your motherboard accessories (if not, look on amazon...) Since they are so tiny and cableless, they are the easiest to install.
    Q: What speed of SSD should I buy?
    This is a bit trickier. There are basically 5 products on the market currently (2020):
    • INTERFACE: SATA (slowest) > PCIe 3.0 > PCIe 3.0x4 > PCIe 4.0
      Why PCIe? NVMe communicates like a PCIe card, so it uses PCIe speeds. As of April 2020, only AMD X570 motherboards and the PlayStation 5 support PCIe 4.0. Intel only supports up to PCIe 3.0x4 and might not support 4.0 until 2021. 4.0 offers massive boosts in bandwidth (5-8GB/s) but you won't notice this different (yet) in gaming.

    • CACHE: Any decent SSD uses a RAM cache to maximize lifetime and reduce latency. However, some new (2019/2020) cheap SSDs are starting to appear that are "DRAMless", using part of the SSD itself as a cache. Avoid these if at all possible; the latency hit is severe.

    • FLASH: The storage chips themselves. Basically to make SSDs affordable, manufacturers went from 1 bit per cell (SLC) to 2 bits (MLC) to 3 bits (TLC) and finally 4 bits (QLC). Every time they do this, you get more storage, but lifetime and speed get cut severely. Currently most "performance" SSDs are TLC and "cheap" SSDs are QLC.

      If you hear about "3D", well, that's the other solution. Most modern SSDs stack layers of MLC/TLC on top of each other. (64, 96, 128 microscopic layers tall). Samsung's VNAND does exactly this, sidestepping the whole QLC problem.
    So given all of this, there are basically these classes available today from cheapest to most expensive:
    1. DRAMless QLC: new, dirt cheap, bad performance, 2.5" or M.2 form factors, avoid.
    2. 2.5" SATA: old drives, mostly going out of the market, although the Samsung 860 Evo hangs around.
    3. QLC + DRAM (Sabrent Rocket Q) The "slowest" of the fast, but still good. Avoid the Intel 660p if possible.
    4. TLC + DRAM (HP ex950, ADATA SX 8200 Pro) 3.0x4 drives with great performance.
    5. Samsung VNAND (970 EVO, 970 Pro) The best of 3.0x4 but very expensive.
    6. PCIe 4.0 (AORUS Gen 4) The fastest today, but double the price of 3.0x4 and games can't use it yet.
    Linus Tech Tips did a blind test for today's games (2019/early 2020) and found no noticeable difference between SATA 2.5" and PCIe 4.0 in terms of initial load and overall experience. Benchmarks slow a slight advantage up the scale, but not enough to be noticeable without the numbers in front of you. Professional apps clearly favor NVMe. tl;dr?
    • Budget minded gamers should opt for 2.5" SATA or QLC+DRAM. Crucial P1, 860 EVO, etc.
    • Perf/pro app gamers should opt for TLC drives. ex950, SX8200 Pro, etc.
    • In general I won't recommend the Samsung 970 unless you find a great sale, as you're always better off with, say, a 1TB TLC drive than a 500GB Samsung.
    • Similarly, unless you are doing heavy video editing or other demanding high end drive stuff, you're better off with 3.0x4 than 4.0 drives for the same size reason. The SX8200 Pro 2TB at some point was at or under $300 USD.
    Q: Why don't games scale with the SSD yet?
    A handful of reasons, although there are probably more:
    • Today's games on PC use RAM as a massive cache, because there's just more to work with than on console. A PS4 game is constantly thrashing its hard drive to stream data in and out, while a PC with 16GB of RAM has a huge amount of space to just preload most of that information. They can "lazy stream", so to speak.

    • Windows overhead. Microsoft is introducing DirectStorage with Xbox Series X as a way to minimize this and is expected to update that on PC DirectX as well.

    • Common denominator: PC is rarely lead platform (even though the vast majority of gamedev is PCs). I'd say most gamedev uses 2.5" SATA these days for development tools and running the build, but optimization is to run on an HD. So I suspect that in the future as PS5/XSX games use relatively huge amounts of RAM and fast storage, games will either scale up better on PC or offer an "SSD mode" to change the loading strategy. <<no inside info here, sadly! Just a guess.
    Looking forward for people buying now, if you want to be "future proof", you can buy a TLC 3.0x4 drive and get the same or better specs as the Xbox Series X drive. But I suspect even QLC drives will see benefit if games start using SSDs more effectively.

    Q: What about PlayStation 5?
    Sony has a bit of a Ferrari. The fastest SSDs today are 8 channel, 5GB/s PCIe 4.0 drives that can only be used on the AMD X570 motherboard. Sony's solution is 12 channel (never used in PC retail) and 5.5GB/s. Add in a custom I/O core and it's probably not directly comparable to any PC drive.

    Later 2020, the second generation of PCIe 4.0 drives will come out on the PC market (Samsung 980 Pro, Phison E18, etc) with even better bandwidth (7GB/s+ vs. PS5 5.5GB/s). So the highway won't be as "wide", but traffic will be faster, sort of evening-out the advantage. I suspect many of them will be considered PS5 compatible. Just keep in mind they will be expensive - expect to pay double the price of a 3.0x4 drive at first.

    Q: Does Brand Name Matter?
    Not really. These days all SSDs use controller chips from a handful of manufacturers. So for example, the HP ex950 and ADATA SX8200 Pro are virtually the same drive despite vastly different brand names. Each brand may introduce their own tweaks, but at the end of the day the number of drive controller and flash manufacturers is very few. There has also been some high profile gaffes by major brands, especially Intel with their subpar 660p/665p models.

    Where brand can matter a bit is if you're buying truly no-name Chinese brands from, say, Alibaba. A lot of b/c-tier stock and controller chips we've never heard of come out of that space. General rule of thumb: if you're not sure about the brand, google some reviews or search on youtube. Almost all of the popular but lesser known brands have reviews. (addlink, ADATA, teamforce, etc)

    Q: How much storage should I get?
    In the old days of SSDs you'd just get a small boot drive for Windows. You can still do that, but SSD speed scales up towards 1TB/2TB. So if you want fast, you want one of those two sizes. There's just a peace-of-mind benefit to having one drive letter that is fast everywhere and not always managing what goes on the SSD, what goes on the HDD, etc. For average gaming a 1TB model is recommended; it's lots of room for games, Windows, and minimal management. The Crucial P1 (QLC+DRAM) has been at or below $100 USD, which means there are affordable drives at that size.

    Keep in mind that most motherboards have only two M.2 slots, and the maximum size M.2 you can buy today is 2TB. (4TB is sometimes available, but only if you have...say, 2-3000 dollars). So if you have a lot of games you may want another M.2 drive later (or just a big HDD for all of those tiny games that don't give a crap about where you store it).

    Q: I want more exact info for (my specific situation)
    You have a few options:
    • Borecraft's SSD Buying Guide is highly recommended and does cover more about SATA if that's your jam.
    • Anandtech regularly has a "best SSDs" list.
    • Newmaxx (Reddit) has his own SSD guide and list of SSDs if you're not sure what to buy.

    • Or you can just ask in the thread :)
     
    Last edited:
    Buyer's Guide
  • Crazymoogle

    Game Developer
    Verified
    Oct 25, 2017
    2,884
    Asia
    resetera PC Builders Thread v3.0

    Welcome to the PC Builders Thread, where we talk about computer hardware! Whether you're upgrading your existing computer, want to build a new one, have a question, or just like talking about computers in general - we've got you covered! Now with even more ARGB!

    Section: Buyer's Guide


    CPUs: BUY (5/2023)
    Best: Ryzen 7800X3D / Core i9 13700K
    Melting issue aside, the 7800X3D is generally the best gaming CPU today. But the 13700K, despite being a power consumption smokestack, is also supremely capable. There are lots of good CPU choices on the market right now, and the next gen is still ~6 months away.

    GPUs: BUY (5/2023)
    Best: RTX 4080 / 4090
    The GPU market continues to see prices tank as the bitcoin world exited and demand floundered. We are starting to see more value-oriented GPUs like the 4060ti-16GB. But the old days of the best GPUs being $500 or less are long gone. Possible refreshes probably won't happen until November, so it's still a good time to buy now if you see a card in your price range.

    SSDs: BUY (5/2023)
    Sweet Spot: 1TB M.2 NVMe (PCIe 4.0)
    Gen5 is here, and it's very expensive. So the best perf is still looking at a 1TB NVMe in the Gen4 flavor.

    MONITORS: BUY (5/2023)
    Sweet Spot: 27" 1440p (IPS) @ 165hz


    Section: Programs for your New Build

    Setup and Overclocking
    Want to know exactly what you bought? Or figure out what kind of overclocking room you may have? Try these.
    • CPU-Z: Displays CPU, Motherboard, and Memory info.
    • GPU-Z: Displays extremely detailed Graphics Card info.
    • MSI Afterburner: Videocard overclocking, temps, fans. Works on non-MSI cards.
    • AMD Ryzen Master: Overclocking/temps for AMD CPUs. Installs some power plans that are good for AMD Builds.
    • WizTree: Visual display of your files, great for figuring out how to make space on your SSD.
    • Macrium Reflect Free Edition: Clone a drive or make an exact backup for later.
    • HWiNFO: Not as obvious as CPU-Z but it lets you do realtime temperature/fan monitoring, if you need that.
    Benchmarking
    Want to test exactly how fast your new build is? Try these.
    Stress Testing
    Concerned there could be an error or stability issue? These can help by stress-testing parts of your system to dig out the problems.
    • OCCT - CPU/GPU/PSU (perfect for finding power supply issues and more)
    • Karhu RAM Test - Memory (paid, but fast/surefire to find problems. Use OCCT if you don't want to pay)

    Ydeoxj1.png

    (Let me know if there's a preferred shop in your region of the world...)
    • Amazon: The defacto world store. Some counterfeits now and then but they do try to crack down on it.
    • NewEgg: Also has a big world presence now. Trusted PC parts seller.
    • MicroCenter (USA): Has a lot of US retail locations, but also functions as an online retailer.
    • Memory Express / Canada Computers (CANADA): Trusted Canada parts dealers with some retail shops.
    • Lazada (Singapore): Generally the place for parts if you don't want to go to Sim Lim.
    • Reddit: r/buildapcsales is a good source to keep an eye out for details if you use Amazon/NewEgg/MicroCenter/etc.
    Pricing Tools
    • PCPartPicker: Price out your own build online, share with us, or just use it as a reminder for your build in the future. (There is a region selector in the top-right for different pricing)
    • Geizhals (Austria/Germany) AKA Skinflint (UK/Poland) are a recommended alternative to PartPicker in Europe. They often have a broader selection of parts and sellers listed.

    Hu7jwtC.png

    Answering these questions will help us recommend or put together a build for you:
    1. What's your budget and currency?
    2. What do you want to use the computer for? (gaming? web? video editing? everything?)
    3. When do you plan to purchase the parts and build it?
    4. Are you reusing any parts or are you building a completely new computer?
    5. Do you only need the computer itself or do you need accessories, such as a monitor, mouse, keyboard, and speakers?
    6. Do you want to overclock? (will make your PC faster, but requires better cooling and can have various side effects)

    GnAC3li.png

    There are plenty of options out there if you don't want to take our word for it...
    How-To's and Guides
     
    Last edited:
    Monitor Guide
  • OP
    OP
    Crazymoogle

    Crazymoogle

    Game Developer
    Verified
    Oct 25, 2017
    2,884
    Asia
    Monitor Guide
    When buying a monitor, there are a bunch of things to consider, but there are four you really need to consider before buying:
    • BUDGET: From $200 to $2000 (or more...)
    • SIZE: 24", 27", 32", TV sized?
    • PURPOSE: Gaming, work, casual, etc.
    • RESOLUTION: 1080p, 1440p, 4K?
    Q: What Screen Technology is the best?
    There are four major screen technologies out there that matter when you're looking to buy a monitor:
    • IPS / AHVA (24", 27", 32")
      Many "Office" panels are IPS. They look fine from any angle and are bright even in a well lit room. They used to be the slowest, but now you can find 144hz "fast" panels these days. IPS is the worst at contrast, so if you want inky dark levels look elsewhere, but generally speaking an IPS display impresses the most in a lit room. (LG controlls IPS; AU Optronics owns AHVA, but they are much the same and every AHVA panel is sold as "IPS") IPS panels also tend to have the best color accuracy and generally all high-end ($$$$) panels are IPS.

    • VA (27", 32", 34", 39")
      See a big, curved display? It's probably a VA panel. VA panels are easy to make big and flexible, and they have the best contrast of any LCD. Downside? Viewing angles are...not great. The more the curve, the bigger the panel...the more obvious it is. Still, they can get impressively large, and most ultrawide panels (21:9 or 32:9) are VA. (VA is not related to AHVA by the way...just similar looking names)

    • TN (22, 24")
      Back when IPS was slow and VA was expensive, TN was king...because it was cheap. TN has never been great at viewing angles, and can't even achieve true 8-bit color, but if you needed a 24" gaming panel, TN had the market. Now, they are still cheap and plentiful, but TN's big selling point is massive refresh rates. 240hz, 300hz. Numbers ridiculous for most people, but if you fancy yourself a pro-gamer, it might be worth a try. I can't recommend TN in general, but they are the cheapest at 22" and 24" sizes. You can buy bigger TN by the way...just that the problems become more and more noticeable.
    • OLED (55", 65", 75")
      Everyone loves OLED for the amazing contrast and HDR, but sadly it's just not an option for most in the PC space. OLED still has image retention issues, and manufacturers are almost entirely sticking to the smartphone (small) and TV (huge) markets. A few manufacturers have since bridged the gap with "Gamer TVs" - 55" or 65" TVs with DisplayPort and G-Sync. But get your wallet ready, because that's what you're buying: an expensive TV.
    Q: What Resolution should I go for?
    To start, there are three "core" resolutions in the PC space you need to know about. (There are others, of course: 1366x768 "720p" old monitors, and 5k or 6k monitors for high-end professional work).
    • HD
      1080p / 1920x1080 (2 million pixels)
      Generally you should only buy a 1080p screen if you're using it for dated hardware. But a 1080p screen is still good for a variety of reasons: pixel perfect PS4 if you want to plug one in, maybe you can only afford a 24" screen, or you want a high refresh rate (200+hz) display. HD screens are the only ones capable of going 200+hz at this time due to the sheer amount of bandwidth required.

    • QHD
      1440p / 2560x1440 (3.7 million pixels)
      QHD is generally the best for working from home. The increase in pixel density means more windows, bigger windows, easier multitasking, etc. It's also the "sweet spot" for gaming today, simply because with half the number of pixels to 4K, you can get a sharp image but still use a variety of video cards. It's also totally fine to play games "under res" (ie: 1080p) on a QHD monitor; it's just that they will look slightly blurry due to pixel interpolation. QHD panels exist up to 175hz so far.

    • 4K "UHD"
      2160p / 3840x2160 (8.2 million pixels)
      UHD is of course the sharpest, but at a heavy cost in rendering power for games. Most desktop GPUs now should be okay, and software has generally updated to support it, but there are weird exceptions now and then. If the panel is too small, it's often best to run 4K at 1080p, since you can pixel double (perfect sharpness) which means that 1080p is totally feasible as a game resolution. Ultimately though 4K is not that popular in the PC space for three clear reasons:
    Q: What about Ultrawide Monitors and Curved Displays?
    Ultrawides are just as the word suggests: monitors as you see above, but with a wider resolution. So it's really all about two things: (1) aspect ratio and (2) curve.

    ASPECT RATIO
    Virtually every TV today is 16:9 "widescreen", but it's not the only ratio. In the PC space there are three:
    • 16:9 (1920x1080, 2560x1440) The standard.
    • 21:9 (2560x1080, 3440x1440) Basically 1.5 screens wide.
    • 32:9 (3840x1080, 5120x1440) Basically 2.0 screens wide.
    Ultrawide panels are popular to get a wider field of view in games, or more screen space for apps. Game support is...a mixed bag. Some games dock the HUD in the middle and expand endlessly outward. Others attach the HUD to the edges, forcing you to tilt your head. And some games don't support it all, relying on black bars. But it's getting better over time. (Ultrawide resolutions are not supported by TV HDMI, so you can only expect to see it on your PC) A 32:9 panel is literally almost two panels stitched together, which can be popular for people who want dual monitors without the gap.

    Many ultrawides can also do high refresh rates (144hz, at least) but doing this also causes bandwidth problems (see 4K) and also requires more GPU power (since you're running 1.5 to 2 screens worth of pixels). It's not excessive though:
    • 2560x1080 (21:9) 2.7m pixels (less than QHD)
    • 3440x1440 (21:9) 4.9m pixels (less than 4K)
    • 3440x1080 (32:9) 3.7m pixels (same as QHD)
    • 5120x1440 (32:9) 7.3m pixels (less than 4K)
    CURVATURE
    Many- but not all - ultrawides are curved VA panels. (There are some 21:9 flat IPS, but I believe all 32:9 are VA). The curve can make things look more immersive, but can make things that require strict geometry - like a powerpoint window - look wonky. YMMV. Curvature is rated on a "XXXXR" scale, so, 1800R, 1000R, etc. The bigger the number? the more subtle the curve. 1200R, 1500R, and 1800R are popular curvatures but a lot depends on the screen size you buy. Personally, I think they look really impressive in person, but I've since graduated back to a flat panel. I think your usage method should decide.

    Q: What about Response Time and Refresh? What is fast enough?
    These are two different specs, but they are closely related:

    REFRESH RATE (hz)
    A movie plays at 24 frames-per-second (FPS). A game goes from 30-60 FPS depending on your specs. But for most people, no matter how many FPS you have, the screen refreshes the pixels 60 times a second (60hz). Gaming displays have changed that by offering 75hz, then 90hz, 120hz, 144hz, and now even some have 165hz, 240hz, or 300hz. Regardless of your game's frame rate, a high refresh rate is ideal because it makes everything about your PC experience a little smoother (for example, moving the mouse). Modern smartphones are also beginning to go above 60hz, and VR headsets usually prefer 75hz-90hz to minimize motion sickness caused by choppiness.

    All of this being said, high refresh rate usually comes at the cost of some color accuracy or other features. So generally speaking a professional, color-calibrated display (or simply an office display) is always going to be 60hz, while a "gaming" display is much more likely to support something higher.

    RESPONSE TIME (ms)
    Remember the trails and ghosting you saw on the original Game Boy? That's what we call a poor "response time". On an LCD, colors don't turn on/off so much as shift from one color to another - the time it takes to go the spectrum is your "response time". You could have a 300hz display, but if the pixel takes 1 second to update, you're going to see those trails I mentioned - the pixel is where it should be, but the pixels behind it are too slow to change back.

    All of that being said, response time is notoriously varied in today's monitors. And if a panel is driven too far, the pixels can overshoot, which causes visual side effects of their own. A good rule of thumb would be 5ms = IPS/AHVA, 1ms = TN. There are some exceptions as AHVA and VA get better, but if you see 1ms or 5ms, you're in good company. High end displays can have much higher response times because they focus on color accuracy; again, they are almost always limited to 60hz though.

    Q: What about FreeSync / G-Sync? Do I need those?
    So you've heard about refresh rate, but the problem is that with games, the frame rate is never consistent and probably won't match the refresh rate of your monitor. So in the past, games had two solutions:
    • V-Sync Framerate: Sync the frame to the refresh rate of the monitor, no matter what. Extra frames are discarded.
    • Unlocked Framerate: Show a frame when it's ready, no matter what. If the monitor is already refreshing, you see "tearing", where one half of the frame is ahead of the other.
    Nvidia's solution G-SYNC (only for their graphics cards) and AMD's FREESYNC both solve this problem by varying the refresh rate to match your frame rate. Perfect sync means no tearing. The only challenge is you need the right pairing of monitor and video card:
    • G-SYNC requires an Nvidia graphics card and a custom chip in the monitor that Nvidia supplies. This means G-Sync can kick in as low as 0hz, but G-Sync monitors are always more expensive as monitor manufacturers pass on the cost to us. (From 0-30hz frame doubling is used)

    • FreeSync does not require a chip and is, as it says, open, so it's way more popular with monitor manufacturers. The downside is that every monitor has its own "range" of supported framerates where FreeSync is active. Nvidia originally did not support FreeSync but in 2019 allowed basic, backdoor support of the standard if you manually enable it. You do need a GTX 1000 series card or better though.
    Overall, the best deal for most is to get a panel that supports FreeSync (most gaming panels do). G-Sync is the deluxe experience but it's ultimately always more expensive.

    Premium Services
    To make things even more confusing, Nvidia and AMD have extended their specs with even more versions that have different features. And like the USB forum they have even renamed them for maximum confusion...
    • FreeSync (Removes tearing at the framerate range supported by the monitor)
    • FreeSync Premium (AKA "FreeSync 2": adds frame doubling to allow 0-30hz support)
    • FreeSync Premium Pro (AKA "FreeSync 2 HDR": adds HDR support)
    • G-Sync (Removes tearing from 0-360hz)
    • G-Sync Compatible (A FreeSync monitor NVidia has tested to work with G-Sync)
    • G-Sync Ultimate (Adds HDR support)
    Generally speaking any premium level has been tested by Nvidia or AMD...and as a result, costs more. So for most, you can just ignore these labels, pick a basic technology, and move on from there. But if your budget is high enough, expect to see one of these labels.

    Q: What about ports? What ports do I need?
    Ports are a little bit more of a wild west than on your TV where HDMI has destroyed all challengers:
    • DisplayPort
      The defacto standard because it's free to license. It's a rectangular plug with one slanted edge. There are two flavors right now: 1.2 and 1.4, but any somewhat modern video card should support both. If you are running a high refresh rate display chances are you will need DisplayPort. A new version (2.0) is coming in 2021 with support for extreme refresh rates, 8K panels, etc but you also need a new cable and video card to support it.

    • HDMI
      The TV standard is still popular here too, and a lot of video cards also have an HDMI port. HDMI bandwidth is less than that of DisplayPort, but a new version (2.1) is slowly filtering into the market with support for high refresh rates, high resolution, and variable refresh rate (VRR, or basically FreeSync) support for TVs and the next generation of game consoles. HDMI is a small rectangular plug with two slanted edges. Yes, this means you can plug-in a PS4 to virtually any PC monitor with HDMI, and then change inputs to toggle between PS4/PC.

    • DVI
      The old standard is almost dead, but some video cards still have it. DVI is a large rectangular plug with three rows of pins. It can't transfer audio and is extremely bandwidth limited, so on some old monitors two DVI cables had to be used in parallel. If you need this your system is too old; the port has been dropped from most video cards as a way to save space on the back (and add more DP/HDMI ports).
    Q: Should I be worried about Dead Pixels?
    Yes and no. Dead Pixels are actually one of three things:
    • Dead (pixel is broken)
    • Partially dead (the R, G, or B subpixel is broken)
    • Stuck (the R, G, or B pixel is locked "on")
    Generally speaking every monitor manufacturer does quality passes to weed out all of the bad panels. In the last 5 panels I've bought I've only seen one dead pixel combined. But it's a lottery: things can happen in shipping. Delivery. Unboxing. Sometimes stuck pixels can be massaged (pressed) to either get them working again or make them dead (less obvious) but most of the time you are stuck with what you see. Some of the chinese or korean products on eBay may be "B" or "C" panels that failed quality check from ASUS/Samsung/etc. that either has some amount of bad pixels, a poorer quality backlight, or other glitches.

    Basically, you get what you pay for. I absolutely believe in the cheap market and you can get some amazing panels for as little as $150 USD. But factor in the risk to your budget; maybe the first one is a dud. Or spend big on one of the big brands that has a zero dead pixel warranty. Finally, even the manufacturers with a loose policy (5+ pixels) will make exceptions for buyers with dead pixels in the middle (very obvious), fully stuck (white) or sometimes simply to make your tech support complaint go away. (It never hurts to ask.)

    High res displays (QHD or 4K) are of course more likely to have dead pixels (simply by sheer math) but you're also less likely to notice them (smaller pixels). So if you have never tested your panel before...ignorance is bliss?

    Q: Okay, but what do I buy?
    There are just so many options on the market, but a few stand out:
    • 24" 144hz HD (TN): You just need a gaming monitor and are not picky on the details.
    • 24" 240hz HD (TN): If you're obsessed with your aim in Counter-Strike or Overwatch.
    • 27" 144hz QHD (IPS): If you want a great work from home + games experience.
    • 32" 60hz 4K (IPS): If you want to split time with PS5
    • 34" 21:9 120hz UWQHD (VA): If you want a cinematic ultrawide experience.
    • 55" OLED: If you want the best HDR.
    In terms of brands, there is a big market now in Chinese rebrand models on ebay and Amazon, as well as the emergence of lesser known brands like Prism+ and Pixio. They can get you a huge discount on a high res IPS display, but you may have to accept a few dead pixels. The high end brands often have warranties against dead pixels (some, like AOC AGON, even have a plan ensuring zero dead pixels) as well as better housing, more bling, and sometimes, useful monitor controls (the cheap ones are rough to mess around with). But panel wise? They are all buying from the same places. My 27" 144hz QHD IPS panel ($300 USD) is the same AU Optronics AHVA seen in a higher priced ASUS panels, just with worse odds on getting dead pixels or an uneven backlight. For most people I say it's worth the risk, but your luck may vary.
     
    Last edited: