So the only independent YouTuber you could show is the one who also literally took off the screen and broke the phone themselves?
Imagine going this hard into denial over a corporation.
So the only independent YouTuber you could show is the one who also literally took off the screen and broke the phone themselves?
Yes, the verge.The Verge what?
You still spewing Apple conspiracies with them
I don't normally quote crazy people, but dude, it's a phone. It breaks for some people and it doesn't for others. Shit happens.Yes, the verge.
Anyway, my point was that I just find it strange that I dont see any tech youtuners having this spontaneous broken phone problem that seems to exist purely on places like cnbc, the verge (yes, the verge), or with people who's job description literally has the word "apple" in it.
Imagine asking why none of all of the people I scoured YouTube to find who had the fold have had any spontaneous screen breaking issues and having the only example given not be a spontaneous screen breakage but the person actually wrecking the phone themselves.
Wait, are you saying Mark Gurman isn't an authority on consumer electronics?- I'll take the opinions of those who do hours of real use footage and testing of the products they review over those who write short articles and whos job title literally reads "apple and devices" guy for bloomberg (where all the real tech experts work of course).
Here's a tech youtuber who makes the same points I'm making.
…
Because of all that, I'll wait a little to see if this is a widespread issue or not.
Here's a tech youtuber who makes the same points I'm making.
- Out of the four people who have made complaints about the screen breaking, only 2 of them didn't actually break it themselves.
- One of the people who broke the screen themselves only decided to mention that they broke it themselves in a separate tweet, not showing in the OP.
- No tech youtuber so far has had their screen suddenly stop working, and there are quite a lot of them.
- I'll take the opinions of those who do hours of real use footage and testing of the products they review over those who write short articles and whos job title literally reads "apple and devices" guy for bloomberg (where all the real tech experts work of course).
-We don't yet know if these issues will arise in consumer products vs test / review units.
Because of all that, I'll wait a little to see if this is a widespread issue or not.
$1980
Lol.Wait, are you saying Mark Gurman isn't an authority on consumer electronics?
All of the reporters who have had issues with their Fold are experts in their fields.
Here's a tech youtuber who makes the same points I'm making.
- Out of the four people who have made complaints about the screen breaking, only 2 of them didn't actually break it themselves.
Yes, out of the 4 out of what, 20 or (much) more people who have been sent review units and had issues, 2 of them broke the phone themselves. One of whom, who is quoted in the OP as having their phone"suddenly" stop working, didnt state that in the beginning.
When I'm done, half of your phones will be working.
The Galaxy Fold, as every other foldable phone, has a plastic display on top of the OLED display that allows the entire screen to flex. We don't yet have flexible glass, so this is just how things are going to have to be for the foreseeable future. But the problem with that top layer on the Galaxy Fold is that it looks exactly like a pre-installed screen protector we've seen on phone after phone — including the Galaxy S10 — that you have the option of removing. On the Fold, though, the layer is not designed to be removed. It's not just inadvisable to do so, it's not meant to be removable. If you remove that top layer, you've effectively done the same as removing the cover glass from your Galaxy S10 — and, at that point, the display panel itself is going to fail. And it won't take long to do so.
Samsung's messaging to early reviewers explicitly reminded us that the top layer of the screen was not removable and that it would compromise the integrity of the display. But even still, the urge to remove that top layer has been ingrained in all of us for over a decade — plastic doesn't feel right on a phone, and it looks like it's removable. Even some of the most egregious offenders of pre-installed screen protectors in the past would still technically allow you to remove the protector and have the phone work properly afterward. This just isn't the same case, even though it feels the same at first.
Samsung must make it clear to consumers that the plastic should not be tampered with.
Some did not remove it and it was still having issues.Hmmm.... AndroidCentral states that allegedly Samsung told early reviewers that the top layer of the Galaxy Fold's screen was NOT removable: https://www.androidcentral.com/heres-why-galaxy-fold-displays-are-already-breaking
Whats the failure rate? Is it high, or are these rare? Every product has some lemons. It's pretty stupid to try to create a narrative based on 1:1000000 failure rate. If it's common then yeah only then is it a 'thing'. The Note 7 exploding battery thing was actually a really low rate but you get enough people with an axe to grind to report it, now it becomes a 'thing'.
Hmmm.... AndroidCentral states that allegedly Samsung told early reviewers that the top layer of the Galaxy Fold's screen was NOT removable: https://www.androidcentral.com/heres-why-galaxy-fold-displays-are-already-breaking
That, uh, feels like something you should probably tell the customers.
They're opening themselves wide open, but this is the issue you deal with making any new product like this. Can't say I'm feeling sympathetic, although it's gonna suck for adoption of this tech. I think people forget that. With the ps5 coming out next year it'll have its own fair share of issues. Happens a lot with electronics ...why the fuck wouldn't they warn consumers then? There should at least be a big ass READ ME on top of all that fancy packaging.
Supposed Savy reviewers are impulsive and dont read manuals? At least accept responsibility for your recklessness
Supposed Savy reviewers are impulsive and dont read manuals? At least accept responsibility for your recklessness
Even that instruction - what kind of statement is "...may cause damage"? To me, that doesn't say definitely that the screen will break if you peel off that layer, more like that it may break if you remove it carelessly. If that sticker is not supposed to be peeled off, they should have at the very least printed "Do not peel off the protective layer, as the screen will stop working if you attempt to remove it".
Not to mention that of course they should have tucked that protective film under the bezels so that it wouldn't look like something that can be peeled off. This reeks of some last moment manufacturing adjustment because they figured out that something is wrong when it was already too late, and the batch of the phones already manufactured.
To be fair they done a lot of people favours as anyone getting one now will be vary of doing that.
Also if they don't read manuals, I highly doubt a lot of the general public will.
Bro who does???Supposed Savy reviewers are impulsive and dont read manuals? At least accept responsibility for your recklessness
Because in 6 months everyone can complain about the new iPhones while praising Samsung for being innovative.Surely they would have known this through stress testing? Why release such immature technology?
Because two review units had issues?
Not to mention that of course they should have tucked that protective film under the bezels so that it wouldn't look like something that can be peeled off. This reeks of some last moment manufacturing adjustment because they figured out that something is wrong when it was already too late, and the batch of the phones was already manufactured and ready for sale.