I don't mean to thread-shit - people are free to discuss whatever, really - but is there anything of value to really wrangle from this?
Anyone who has payed at least one eye's worth of attention should be well aware that Hillary is a stone-cold careerist and a thoroughly cynical person.
The idea that Bill's spotlight-infidelity was some kind of "oh I never, my world came crashing down, I went to church and everything to make the room stop spinning" is impossible to believe. To believe that, you'd have to assume that Hillary is a naive idiot, which she clearly isn't.
That said, it's weird to bring this up now, considering that the last thing a lot of people associate Bill Clinton's skeeviness with isn't some pointless blowjob-story from the 90's, but his connection to Jeffrey Epstein. That's not going to go away by you awkwardly selling out your supposed LGBTQ+ credentials on the (low) off-chance that it might make you look more sympathetic.
It's a weird strategy - which I assume this is - to clumsily try to run back the tape on her and Bill to the 90's, as if it had any merit today, and wasn't easily clocked as such. It indicates a pretty profound amount of contempt for the intelligence of "your fellow man" in assuming they can't piece these things together immediately.
Either that, or she lives in a sealed bubble these days, and has completely given up on the pretense of engaging with people around her who aren't "when prophecy-fails"-type sycophants.
Also, I don't think this phone call from a close friend about their trans-child ever happened. And if it did, I'm sure they feel great - again, as a close friend, which is something Hillary definitely has - about her lazily co-opting it for her own means.
