Yeah I don't necessarily agree with the Pro being the deciding factor but plastering captured on Nintendo Switch on clearly downgraded screenshots is out of place.
Well, the game is listed as Q4 2019 as of this tweet https://twitter.com/NintendoAmerica/status/1139563144848826374?s=19
Did you get past White Orchard? I find the world and story to become much better once you leave that area. Game becomes more difficult, too, but if the fundamental didn't interest you, as opposed to it just being too simplified without the need for items and arts, then I guess it's not your cup of tea.
What cynical thoughts you harbour. Edit: That was supposed to be said playfully, but it came out rather harsh. Sorry!
White orchard is the opening area. If you did the quest you mentioned, then you are past it already. I guess the conclusion would be that it's not your cup of tea, then.
I don't know why you'd buy it for the Switch considering you can get a used PS4 copy for less than $20. If this is a game that has already failed to hold your attention and you just want to try it out again, paying a full $60 wouldn't be the best idea.
no. as I said, I believe they probably experimented with a port for a while and may not have been satisfied with the maximum they could have gotten out of the base switch. a pro model's higher performance may have allowed them to reach acceptable maximum performance. kinda like Hyrule Warriors on the 3DS (which ran like dog shit on the base 3DS).
For this scenario to make sense to me, I would expect the game to have been unveiled after the PRO announcement so that they can actually market the PRO version. As it stands, I see no compelling reason to think this was the set-up for this game's port.
Iirc the first time I hear about it was fall last year. At the time it had already been in development, but I don't know how long.
We need to see more but I don't see this as a Hyrule Warriors situation. There will be about 40m Switches by the time this game launches. If there is a pro specific enhancement it will be an enhancement to a good base. I don't see Nintendo or CDPr going through all that work to bring a "dogshit" port to OG Switch just to sell people on the Pro.
The first point is a complete non-sequitur, so just call them out on that for poor argumentation.
I don't think so. It is assumed because no one before has shown any inclination to get a 32 GB card - in fact, several publishers have forgone using a 16 GB card, even.
It's possible. I don't disbelieve it, but there isn't solid evidence for it, really.
I think main reason with that game is simply not looking very eye friendly in big screens etc. Better to hide and let the music do his job in trailer tbh. It will look niceish on tablet mode but big screen looks garbo
I highly doubt your argument. Those games have microtransactions and they would easily reproduce the investment considering there is not much competition on the System. The only thing that stops them is them.
No more than the Switch versions of every other current gen game robbed them of theirs
Perhaps. I suppose Doom has a similar atmosphere of bloody devastation that translated reasonably well to Switch.
a new engine made for modern hardware and APIs can't handle the switching, but an engine that was made for older hardware that doesn't support modern APIs and has CPUs that aren't used anymore can?
Alvin Liu said:
