Do these people realize they're asking for the impossible?
You can't take no deal off the table. It's either that or revoking A50.
The Parliament voted down the only deal.
To extend A50, you'd need the EU27 approval, which you likely won't get.
To hold a 2nd ref, you'd need more time.
What are these people asking for exactly?
Off topic but holy shit, a fellow Jambo!It'll be a nothing statement. Usual Maybot will of the people stuff.
Don't get excited. It'll be the usual soundbites. "Deliver Brexit" will be said at least four times.
It'll be a nothing statement. Usual Maybot will of the people stuff.
Don't get excited. It'll be the usual soundbites. "Deliver Brexit" will be said at least four times.
but is the podium is strong and stable enough though
Depends on the colour of Brexit
May is awful garbage, but this is just more British exceptionalism. The EU holds all the cards and has no reason to grant such extensions and concessions.
There is no Good Deal. The choice is Remain, a Bad Deal, or No Deal.
This is the kind of shit Corbyn needs to be doing, even if it's formal posturing.
BBC News said:Corbyn and May in deadlock over talks
Jeremy Corbyn will not meet with the prime minister for "substantive talks" until Theresa May rules out a no-deal Brexit.
Mrs May invited leaders of all parties to have individual discussions with her on the way ahead for Brexit - starting tonight.
But in his response after the vote in the Commons, Mr Corbyn said Mrs May must rule out a no-deal Brexit before any "positive discussions" could take place.
I really can't imagine anything other than a general election or second referendum breaking the deadlock.
Mods, ban this filth.Probably opening a can of worms here, but I'm a Hibee. Come at me.
Probably opening a can of worms here, but I'm a Hibee. Come at me.
I'm talking about Corbyn meeting her, not simply what Corbyn said. There is no suggestion Corbyn went and met her tonight like the other party leaders did for 10~15 minutes each.
I believe "use M20 as a lorry car park" is still on the table.
That's great. They went to meet her to tell her what he already told her in the House.
At this time, what we need is unity and cross team cooperation, in the national interest.
What are the DUP doing with the magic money pot then? Can they even spend if there's no government?On a slightly different note, I just realized that NI has now been without a government for exactly 2 years today.
Cross parliamentary talks would be pointless. There's no way May could ever support a permanent customs union. Shed have a rebellion on her hands of around 100 tories. She wouldn't survive long if she went along with a Labour brexit.
I really can't imagine anything other than a general election or second referendum breaking the deadlock.
Yeah, and Corbyn is currently the odd one out who didn't do that, and as I said that gives free ammo to the usual suspects. How can you not see that?
Corbyn should be doing the above and then broadcasting that to the public.
Both BBC and Sky giving coverage to the small opposing parties to the Tories, more than it seemingly like Corbyn is taking control of this
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/46874049
https://news.sky.com/story/live-government-faces-no-confidence-vote-after-pms-defeat-11608556
It's not fucking difficult for Corbyn and his PR team to not score an own goal this early. Play the game properly at this crucial starting point.
I think it's a particularly old bingo card, but it's funny how many of them are still in use.
If you're in this thread arguing against Brexit, you're all good in my book. None of us are perfect.Don't worry, the real natural order will resume soon. I'd also be surprised if any mod even knows what a hibee is.
What are the DUP doing with the magic money pot then? Can they even spend if there's no government?
If you're in this thread arguing against Brexit, you're all good in my book. None of us are perfect.
"The first confidence vote for a quarter of a century ended, as most confidence votes do, with victory for the government," writes our political correspondent Lewis Goodall.
"Only three have succeeded in ejecting an administration in the last 120 years, and the result of this one was never really in doubt.
"It's why Jeremy Corbyn didn't want to call it in the first place. Not least because it means he will come under relentless pressure to now move on to the next stage of Labour's Brexit policy.
"Back in September, the Labour party, after considerable internal wrangling, adopted a position at its party conference which just about satisfied most.
"First, it was decided, the party would do all it could to secure a general election, probably through a confidence vote. If that proved not to be possible, "other options" would be considered, including the possibility of a new referendum with remain on the ballot.
"As far as the proponents of a so-called "People's Vote" are concerned, the possibility of a general election has now been exhausted and the party must go on to prosecute a new referendum.
"But Corbyn and his top team disagrees. I'm told by a source close to the leadership that they will try a confidence vote at least once more, when the PM's plan has become known.
"If, they reckon, it becomes clear that the PM has no plan B, cross party talks breakdown and no deal looks likely, perhaps the arch-Remainer Tories might peel away, abstain in a motion of confidence and Jeremy Corbyn might have a chance to form a government.
"I'm also told that Corbyn is extremely unlikely to back another referendum any time soon. They will not abandon seeking an election as Brexit is likely the only opportunity to force one until 2022. That's a long march ahead.
"Secondly, I'm told there's genuine concern of shadow cabinet walkouts and a backbench rebellion. Scores of Labour MPs represent Leave seats and many are sceptical about any such a move.
"These are genuine structural problems of uniting the Labour coalition of metropolitan uber remainers and post—industrial leavers with which any Labour leader would have to grapple.
"I'm not convinced that up to this point at least, a different leader, an Andy Burnham or Yvette Cooper would have behaved much differently.
"But thanks to Corbyn's Eurosceptic past, he has little credit in the bank of the parliamentary Labour remainers. They suspect he is a Brexiter in Remainer clothing.
"I suspect this is somewhat unfair, though the truth may be even more damning.
"Corbyn might have no love for the EU, be deeply sceptical of it, but it is not a cause which occupied much of his political career.
"He was not a Labour Bill Cash or John Redwood, obsessed with all matters European, committing himself to "freeing" Britain of the EU's yolk. Although he voted against virtually every European treaty, he barely mentioned the subject in parliament before he became leader.
"As source after source has told me time again, the truth is, it is not an issue which exercises Corbyn much, he's largely uninterested and wishes it would go away so he could focus on other priorities.
"Thus Brexit is not, as for some of his colleagues, part of his socialism. It is therefore an issue to be managed to maximum political utility, a matter of head not heart. This, perhaps more than anything else, is the ultimate sin for his enemies, so much more attached to the EU than he.
"Corbyn will not back another referendum unless he has absolutely no choice.
"By way of illustration, look at his actions this evening, refusing to engage with the PM's cross party talks on Brexit until she takes no deal off the table, which he knows she will not.
"He hopes, I'm sure to run down the clock til the PM is out of options, save for one- a new election. For Jeremy Corbyn Brexit will always remain just that- his best (but most perilous) electoral opportunity."