If enough of us come out and vote we can nullify those things. In fact, in a big enough wave election gerrymanders can actually work against you depending on the type of gerrymander it is, so it's important we overwhelm the polls.Even if we all vote we still have to deal with gerrymandering and possible Russian interference.
If enough of us come out and vote we can nullify those things. In fact, in a big enough wave election gerrymanders can actually work against you depending on the type of gerrymander it is, so it's important we overwhelm the polls.
There is nothing more important right now than this upcoming election. We can drive a stake through Trump if we take back the Senate on top of the House.
Unless impeachment happens, the only option is to vote in 2020. The US first need somebody who can go against Trump. I haven't followed US politics in a while, but as far as I'm aware there aren't any contenders yet.
One would hope so but until November, Florida is considered to be the best chance Rs have at flipping any D seat.Rick looking at the writing on the wall. No, Rick, your bitch ass will not be spared in the coming culling either.
I'm in California, too.I wish it was as easy as just voting, but I live in California where over 4 million votes didn't really count in 2016 because of the electoral college.
Trump thoroughly mischaracterized how the death toll of 2,975 was tallied in the study, conducted by George Washington University.
GWU researchers did not, contrary to his claim, attribute any specific individual's death to Maria. Given the methodology, there was not an opportunity to misclassify someone who died of old age, as Trump suggested.
Rather, the study looked at the number of deaths from September 2017 to February 2018 and compared that total with what would have been expected based on historical patterns. The researchers factored in many variables, including the departure of hundreds of thousands of island residents in the aftermath of Maria.
Had the GWU researchers done what Trump claimed they did — attributing any death to Maria — the six-month death toll from the hurricane would have been 16,608.
Carlos Santos-Burgoa, principal investigator of the GWU study and a professor in the Department of Global Health, said he and his colleagues were unbiased in their work.
"We stand by the science underlying our study. It is rigorous. It's state-of-the-art. We collected the data from the official sources. Everything can be validated," he said. "We didn't receive any pressure from anybody to go this way or that way. We wouldn't do it. We are professionals of public health."
But science and research is fake news.
3000 died, but only if you do everything you can to link their deaths via the butterfly effect. Sure, some indirect deaths should be attributed, but I read a lot of stories that shouldn't be attributed. It's sad that a lot of that number is partisan BS and pseudo science.
While at Ft Lewis we had a fairly good sized Earthquake. The media was so desperate to hype it that they attributed a 80 something year old lady dying of a heart attach to the earthquake. Yeah, ok.
Blood leads in the news. A 90 plus year old invalid lady dying of sepsis due to infected bed sores is not the result a hurricane. It's from a lazy ass staff not turning her.
Dehydrated folks dying months later while millions of gallons of water sits undistributed has nothing to do with a hurricane and everything to do with corruption. Yes, leadership on that island allowed citizens to die for political points. We had folks waiting to move the supplies but nobody allowed them to do so. It's sick.
Jesus, just call him a fucking liar and a disgrace and stop dancing around it.
I seriously don't get it. They are already seen as 'fake' and biased by the entire Trump base. They might as well lean into it. They are actively damaging the country by normalizing and giving him the benefit of the doubt on what are clearly outright LIES.The media is so afraid of being accused of bias that they end up normalizing bullshit.
Notice the only thing they say is false is the Dems thing.
Pretty much. What he's saying still comes off as 'Puerto Rico was this bad beforehand, and we did nothing to help them with this issue.'Government response to a crisis both federal and local dictate the fucking survival rates of the victims man come on. You can't just somehow wash your hands of a US territory because arbitrary reasons. If things were lacking then that's literally a BIGGER incentive to fucking act, not a reason to ignore.
I seriously don't get it. They are already seen as 'fake' and biased by the entire Trump base. They might as well lean into it. They are actively damaging the country by normalizing and giving him the benefit of the doubt on what are clearly outright LIES.
Not 'mistruths' not 'mispoke' ninety percent of the time anything he says is a bald ass LIE
its a fools errand attempting to find rationale in the musings of an irrational garbage pile.how does "70% of the power was out before the storm" make sense
Ask that piece of shit to post the links to the stories 'he's read'. I want to see what his fucking sources are, though something tells me deep in my bowels that I already know what they are.From someone replying to a post my cousin made on Facebook and I'm now irrationally angry from reading it:
Sociopaths gonna sociopath no matter how many fucking people die.
There are literally people dying in a CURRENT HURRICANE and this is where Trump's mind is.
Yeah, and this.
There are literally people dying in a CURRENT HURRICANE and this is where Trump's mind is.
Newsflash for them... when you normalize bullshit and treat it as "equal time for both sides", you are exhibiting bias. Against reality.The media is so afraid of being accused of bias that they end up normalizing bullshit.
Notice the only thing they say is false is the Dems thing.
Newsflash for them... when you normalize bullshit and treat it as "equal time for both sides", you are exhibiting bias. Against reality.
As a Californian it's crazy to me that half of those states combined would have less people than just the city of Los Angeles. New York City has millions more people than those states combined.
And it's kind of infuriating that states like them can have more say in elections than we do.
They do, however, have 10 senators. Compared to California's 2... and Puerto Rico's 0.They don't have more say, those 5 states only have 16 electoral votes combined, compared to California's 55.