Trump: Hydroxychloroquine approved by the FDA for prescription to treat COVID-19 (UP: FDA says it is NOT approved, but currently in testing)

Deleted member 13628

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,099
Not speaking to the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine, but what on earth would an anti-biotic do, mechanically, to improve prognosis of COVID-19 patients?
It's not an antibiotic, it's an anti-malarial. It also has immunosuppressive effects which is why it's used as a treatment for RA and SLE.
So... this trial is to test potential prophylaxis and/or to reduce severity if taken before illness develops?
Yes.
 

DickGrayson

Alt Account
Member
Jan 30, 2020
941
It's not an antibiotic, it's an anti-malarial. It also has immunosuppressive effects which is why it's used as a treatment for RA and SLE.
The OP states:

" A drug developed over half a century ago to treat malaria is showing signs that it may also help cure COVID-19 — especially when combined with an antibiotic, a promising new study reveals. "

Implying that the antibiotic is somehow improving the efficacy of the antimalrial. Clearly someone with viral pneumonia can be treated with antibiotics to help reduce co-infections, but the antibiotic has no effect on the efficacy of the antimalarial right?

Because, like, how the fuck would that work?
 

CursedOctopus

Member
Oct 27, 2017
530
I asked my sister if she had ever taken hydroxychloroquine since she has rheumatoid arthritis, and she said she had. It turns out she's allergic to it, so hopefully other drugs will be as or more effective.
 

Kernel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,647
I'm sure "Trump has cure for COVID-19" is circulating among the MAGAsshat crowd.

This will just reinforce his popularity among them if there were any doubters.
 

TreadTalks

Avenger
Oct 28, 2017
3,258
United States
The FDA approved for covid-19 treatment part was wrong, BUT the French and Chinese studies are really encouraging. And generally we know the side effects.
 

TreadTalks

Avenger
Oct 28, 2017
3,258
United States
The OP states:

" A drug developed over half a century ago to treat malaria is showing signs that it may also help cure COVID-19 — especially when combined with an antibiotic, a promising new study reveals. "

Implying that the antibiotic is somehow improving the efficacy of the antimalrial. Clearly someone with viral pneumonia can be treated with antibiotics to help reduce co-infections, but the antibiotic has no effect on the efficacy of the antimalarial right?

Because, like, how the fuck would that work?
Not sure re: the how, but those were the results. All six patients who had the combo were no longer contagious after 6 days, compared to 75% of those who only took the anti malarial drug, and ~10% of those who had nothing. The sample size is small, but still promising!
 

xir

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,206
Los Angeles, CA
Yep, except the drug is not mass produced due to low demand. It is unlikely that your local pharmacy has any in stock right now.
Idk I worked in a pharmacy for a long time and it was always in stock and there’s multiple generics. Wasn’t a fast mover in the auto counters but not really rarely prescribed. Still need a Doctor to write a script so can’t really have a run though I’ll guns you the cipro/anthrax deal back in the day.
 

Relix

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,109
Ugh. This would suck for a family member who depends on this pill due to rheumatoid arthritis. Not the fact that a cure is there mind you, but of fools coming in to buy this and drying up supply.
 

G.O.O.

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,970
Just so you know, Didier Raoult, the epidemiologist who touted choloquine as effective against the virus, is *extremely* criticized by French doctors. He did some good work in the past but the way he conducts the studies is far from ideal and his declarations about the efficiency of chloroquine are unethical at best, dangerous at worst.

I hope chloroquine works, but if people just start taking it like aspirin, we're in for quite a shock.
 

Deleted member 13628

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,099
The OP states:

" A drug developed over half a century ago to treat malaria is showing signs that it may also help cure COVID-19 — especially when combined with an antibiotic, a promising new study reveals. "

Implying that the antibiotic is somehow improving the efficacy of the antimalrial. Clearly someone with viral pneumonia can be treated with antibiotics to help reduce co-infections, but the antibiotic has no effect on the efficacy of the antimalarial right?

Because, like, how the fuck would that work?
I didn't see that part. Interesting that they combined it with azithromycin. Looking into it, azithromycin can apparently be used with atovaquone to treat babesiosis (another malaria-like parasitic infection). So it may have some synergistic effect.

It wouldn't be for bacterial co-infections since a lot of these people don't have pneumonia in the first place. And azithromycin wouldn't be what is used for bacterial pneumonia co-infections anyway, since those are often caused by staph aureus which it doesn't treat.
 

JDSN

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
4,141
I didn't see that part. Interesting that they combined it with azithromycin. Looking into it, azithromycin can apparently be used with atovaquone to treat babesiosis (another malaria-like parasitic infection). So it may have some synergistic effect.

It wouldn't be for bacterial co-infections since a lot of these people don't have pneumonia in the first place. And azithromycin wouldn't be what is used for bacterial pneumonia co-infections anyway, since those are often caused by staph aureus which it doesn't treat.
Azythromycin has anti-inflamatory effects not associated to the antibiotic effect itself. So that could be the logic behind it.
 

Shadybiz

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,603
Lol. Did OP actually believe something that Trump said, without waiting for clarification?

Clarification is ALWAYS needed with this massive idiot.
 

Stinkles

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,459
What the fuck is the matter with this dude?
I mean everything.

“George W us the stupidest president ever!”

“This pop artist is the most egotistical narcissist ever!”

“Martin Shkreli is the most out of touch sociopath in history!”

“Nixon would put his political survival in front of a dying child while everyone watched!”

“There is no low that some CEO wouldn’t stoop to even if it destroyed the country “

“I wouldn’t be surprised if that famous dude had actually had people killed “

“that guy is the worst businessman of all time! A broken clock would make better decisions “

“I think that politician is a a traitor to his country “

“He’s probably a serial rapist “

“I bet he paid someone to do his entire degree in college and just screwed around there’s no way he could even graduate high school! “

“How can you tell when he’s lying? His lips move!”

All of these hot takes are typically easily disproven hyperbole — yet all of them are potentially factual statements about Donald Trump. Zero hyperbole. They’re all credible.
 

KtotheRoc

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
37,891
So many people are going to die because of this fool. Great fucking job, Republicans.
 

Juturna

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,063
Trying to refill my prescription early in case there is a run on this. Both me and my mother both take it for RA. CVS/Insurance isn't letting me though. Oh well.
 
Nov 13, 2017
8,655
Just so you know, Didier Raoult, the epidemiologist who touted choloquine as effective against the virus, is *extremely* criticized by French doctors. He did some good work in the past but the way he conducts the studies is far from ideal and his declarations about the efficiency of chloroquine are unethical at best, dangerous at worst.

I hope chloroquine works, but if people just start taking it like aspirin, we're in for quite a shock.
That's why there are multiple simultaneous tests taking place. I also don't see a world in which you could buy it like aspirin. For the sake of order, I imagine they would prescribe it with a positive diagnosis of COVID-19.
 

God_Of_Phwoar

Member
May 29, 2018
7,674
Near London UK
At this point I dont know why journalists have any interest in talking to Trump. Just bypass him and call other people. To be fair, despite his "Media are enemy of the people" shit, it would hurt is ego if he faced an empty press conference and the journalists published articles saying "There's no point any more, the man's an idiot"
 

Deleted member 13628

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,099
Azythromycin has anti-inflamatory effects not associated to the antibiotic effect itself. So that could be the logic behind it.
Doubt it. That "anti-inflammatory" effect is thought of in the context of COPD exacerbations and airway inflammation/mucus production. And it's just a convenient "bonus" of the drug. The main use is still antibacterial. It doesn't replace steroids in treating the above.
 
Last edited:

Lcs

Member
Aug 9, 2018
210
The OP states:

" A drug developed over half a century ago to treat malaria is showing signs that it may also help cure COVID-19 — especially when combined with an antibiotic, a promising new study reveals. "

Implying that the antibiotic is somehow improving the efficacy of the antimalrial. Clearly someone with viral pneumonia can be treated with antibiotics to help reduce co-infections, but the antibiotic has no effect on the efficacy of the antimalarial right?

Because, like, how the fuck would that work?
Probably by killing some healthy cells that are targeted by the virus.
 

Ghostmate

Member
Dec 11, 2017
238
I didn't see that part. Interesting that they combined it with azithromycin. Looking into it, azithromycin can apparently be used with atovaquone to treat babesiosis (another malaria-like parasitic infection). So it may have some synergistic effect.

It wouldn't be for bacterial co-infections since a lot of these people don't have pneumonia in the first place. And azithromycin wouldn't be what is used for bacterial pneumonia co-infections anyway, since those are often caused by staph aureus which it doesn't treat.
I doubt the synergy between the two because hydroxychloroquine is n-dealkylated by CYP3A4, which azithromycin doesn't really seem to use as a pathway to metabolize - if I remember my pharmacology correctly. Something like clarithromycin or erythromycin might be more synergistic pharmacodynamically. Also, I thought azithromycin was still very popular for use with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) or am I remembering my guidelines wrong?
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,524
It's definitely being used, it's just not FDA approved yet. It's off-label at the moment.

Caveat: we are still at the throw the kitchen sink phase for the very sick/vented patients.
 

Deleted member 13628

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,099
I doubt the synergy between the two because hydroxychloroquine is n-dealkylated by CYP3A4, which azithromycin doesn't really seem to use as a pathway to metabolize - if I remember my pharmacology correctly. Something like clarithromycin or erythromycin might be more synergistic pharmacodynamically. Also, I thought azithromycin was still very popular for use with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) or am I remembering my guidelines wrong?
Yes it's used for CAP, often with other antibiotics.

The macrolides are kind of weird antibiotics since they also treat a lot of infections from atypical organisms (mycobacteria, chlamydia, mycoplasma, etc.). That's why I looked into it a bit more and lo and behold it's used off label as part of the treatment for babesiosis. So there may be something to it when combined with hydroxychloroquine.
 

Stooge

Member
Oct 29, 2017
4,232
This is the second major time he has promised a medical breakthrough that doesn't exist.
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,524
Azithromycin has pulmonary anti-inflammatory properties and is commonly used in patients with COPD that present with exacerbations. That is why it is being used in these patients.




Like I said earlier, it's literally throw the kitchen sink, anything that can theoretically help phase right now. The studies are too small at the moment to know if these things actually work, but we will know more as time progresses.
 

Deleted member 9932

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
5,711
This is the second major time he has promised a medical breakthrough that doesn't exist.
This is very real and used on trials in france with great results when used along with azithromycin . It's just that the sample is still very small
25 users, only 6 with hydroxychloroquine +azithromycin and 16 control group.
Good thing is that the control group was much younger than the other group, and the virus load after 6 days was much lower in the treated patients (and actually 0 in the 6 patients using both!. 100%).

This obviously needs to be fast-tracked to understand if this is simply a positive random trend or if it actually works.
 

brokeastronaut

One Winged Slayer
Member
Dec 21, 2017
15,863
This is very real and used on trials in france with great results when used along with azithromycin . It's just that the sample is still very small
25 users, only 6 with hydroxychloroquine +azithromycin and 16 control group.
Good thing is that the control group was much younger than the other group, and the virus load after 6 days was much lower in the treated patients (and actually 0 in the 6 patients using both!)
Do you have a link to this?
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,705
there have additionally been multiple clinical trials in China that are showing very encouraging results

it's not a magic bullet and he jumped the gun on announcing it, but there are multiple promising candidates for anti-viral treatments that have already had their safety profiles established

so let's have hope!
 

brokeastronaut

One Winged Slayer
Member
Dec 21, 2017
15,863
The peer-reviewd paper about the trials

the draft paper that recommended initial trials
Thank you
 

SpaceCrystal

Member
Apr 1, 2019
6,016
He needs to stop fucking saying things unless they are actually verified true. Tons of people are already sharing this around, from social media to DJs on the radio, as a potential cure. He is causing more damage by saying shit like this when it’s not actually verified by the government agency he says it is. So frustrating.
After three years, you would think that people would learn that every word that comes out of Trump's mouth is a lie by now.