-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Trump promises shutdown *today* if Senate does not approve border wall
- Thread starter Sho_Nuff82
- Start date
I think the point is.
it is irrelevant of if they give on wall funding or not.
Trump is shutting down the gov. Cause I honestly beleives he thinks it'll stop the dems from taking their seats on jan 3rd. and impede other investigations into his traitorous criminal syndicate.
>
Judy Woodruff @JudyWoodruff
Chief Justice John Roberts sides with majority ruling against Trump ban on legal asylum
CNN Breaking News @cnnbrk
Supreme Court upholds block on President Trump's asylum ban in 5-4 ruling after Chief Justice John Roberts sides with liberals
Chief Justice John Roberts sides with majority ruling against Trump ban on legal asylum
CNN Breaking News @cnnbrk
Supreme Court upholds block on President Trump's asylum ban in 5-4 ruling after Chief Justice John Roberts sides with liberals
owning the libs by crashing the stock market and making sure government employees don't get paid. merry christmas
We're ending the year with the president capitulating to overseas dictators over his own American cabinet, pulling our troops out of hot areas to leave our allies to die, sabotaging climate talks for big business interest, wrecking the market with unstable policies and dated ideas of tariffs, shutting down the government to appease a minority of racists against the wishes of his own party, and continually attempting to subvert our system of justice by undermining our law enforcement agencies.
Happy New Year, everyone!
Happy New Year, everyone!
Is this his snap? Starting next year he'll rest and watch the sun rise on a grateful universe?
And taking food out of poor people's mouths. Don't forget that one.
I personally feel like he's trying to pay all his debts before it's too late, and is scrambling to do it right now.
BTW - if there ever is a Senate Impeachment hearing, The Chief Justice of SCOTUS, John Roberts, would be presiding over it.
:)
Yeah, it would basically fuck over the people in congress not in it for the money and haven't married a plastic bottle provider heiress or something
Oh! Roberts continues being the "moderate" we didn't want but we currently need.
Donald, you don't even know how to use an umbrella!
If only this were the first post and nothing else, if only.
Doubt we'll see much positive movement on Christmas Eve for 3 hours with the government shutdown.
If he does that they're just going to keep playing the clip of him saying it's him
Roberts at least has proven to be an independent judge. Thank god he's not as terrible as the last two we just got who have so far ran directly on party lines.
In their defense, it was a done deal and was promised. Trump gonna Trump though.
I feel like you are giving to much praise to Paul Ryan. He's way worse than that.
So Trump would sign the deal the Senate already passed once House passes it? That deal had the 1.6, right? So he's completely and utterly caving if that's true
I've been banned a couple times recently, I didn't want to push it.
Indeed. Bi-partisan support, and likely enough support in the House to veto-proof it, if that FUCKING SHITHEEL Paul Ryan would've put it to a vote.
Who knows. But as long as there is a shutdown, he can't go golfing, so I'm sure he will cave: