Lol.All this does is push him further away from your cause. It’s not effective, stop.
Lol.All this does is push him further away from your cause. It’s not effective, stop.
hehAll this does is push him further away from your cause. It’s not effective, stop.
A lot of us don't care if that's all it takesAll this does is push him further away from your cause. It’s not effective, stop.
Honestly, a "debt ceiling" is the dumbest way to fight increasing debt. It doesn't address the reason why budgets keep ballooning, it just pretends a magical line in the sand, which can be redrawn by the exact same people who make the debt in the first place, can make everything better.Which probably should be automatic if the deadline is hit like most other countries in the world. The self inflicted pain we do is so dumb.
So any white person is imbued with racism at birth?
This is in the context of America specifically so I'm gonna suggest you all upset at the comment read about settler colonialism (the short answer is yes)
No, you aren’t born with it in your DNA, but literally from the time you emerge from the womb you’re born into a world that will constantly tell you how much better whiteness, and being white by extension, is. But keep pretending to misunderstand for your fun detail.So any white person is imbued with racism at birth?
IDK, I feels like it's a very generalistic statement. I'm not offended by it, but I do think it's wrong to think that.
So any white person is imbued with racism at birth?
I agree that there are signals everywhere downplaying non-white skin, however I do believe one isn't immediately corrupted by those. Perhaps confused? A kid would normally ask his/her parents "Why is X thing like that on TV?" and then it is up to the parent to teach good values to the child and how should these signals be interpreted.
IDK, I feels like it's a very generalistic statement. I'm not offended by it, but I do think it's wrong to think that everyone is racist at birth. Humans are clean at birth, it is the world and how it's made that corrupts them, the parents will play an enormous role in how a child will develop.
I agree with you there, no need to be aggressive.No, you aren’t born with it in your DNA, but literally from the time you emerge from the womb you’re born into a world that will constantly tell you how much better whiteness, and being white by extension, is. But keep pretending to misunderstand for your fun detail.
That's Brian Schatz, he's good people. Very happy to have him in office.LOL the senator from Hawaii flew all the way back home, got a phone call when he arrived from Schumer that he needed to go back to vote and then got on the next flight back to DC.
He knows GOP won't have majority forever. He'd be a fool to get rid of it.He definitely would on something that matters, but he knows the blowback
“If you don’t take that back then maybe I WILL stop caring about your rights and fighting for equality for all, that will show you!”All this does is push him further away from your cause. It’s not effective, stop.
It is not at birth but society--starting with media and ending at the dinner table--leads people to a bias that is factually racist. It has been ingrained in white people that there are not part of the "other". Systemic racism is racism nonetheless. There's a massive gulf between violent racism and subconscious racism, but it's all part of the same umbrella.So any white person is imbued with racism at birth?
IDK, I feels like it's a very generalistic statement. I'm not offended by it, but I do think it's wrong to think that.
So any white person is imbued with racism at birth?
I agree that there are signals everywhere downplaying non-white skin, however I do believe one isn't immediately corrupted by those. Perhaps confused? A kid would normally ask his/her parents "Why is X thing like that on TV?" and then it is up to the parent to teach good values to the child and how should these signals be interpreted.
IDK, I feels like it's a very generalistic statement. I'm not offended by it, but I do think it's wrong to think that everyone is racist at birth. Humans are clean at birth, it is the world and how it's made that corrupts them, the parents will play an enormous role in how a child will develop.
But you just said you didn’t, and you questioned the validity of what I said, like there isn’t the black doll white doll test, like Jane Elliott and all her talks don’t exist, like decades and decades of research doesn’t exist. You reacted with what you thought instead of what is, and your thoughts literally put black lives in danger, so nice shot with the whole “angry minority” comment too. Any other thoughts you want to share?
They weren’t being aggressive. You seem to have a grasp on what white fragility means and yet you weere nitpicking.
I didn't mean to come off like that, my apologies if that's the case.They weren’t being aggressive. You seem to have a grasp on what white fragility means and yet you weere nitpicking.
I think you're being too literal. Basically we're all going to have at least some subconscious racial biases, especially white people in America, because of all the influences on our developing brains. While parenting can be a major factor, it's also friends, neighbors, relatives, teachers, and all the media you consume.So any white person is imbued with racism at birth?
I agree that there are signals everywhere downplaying non-white skin, however I do believe one isn't immediately corrupted by those. Perhaps confused? A kid would normally ask his/her parents "Why is X thing like that on TV?" and then it is up to the parent to teach good values to the child and how should these signals be interpreted.
IDK, I feels like it's a very generalistic statement. I'm not offended by it, but I do think it's wrong to think that everyone is racist at birth. Humans are clean at birth, it is the world and how it's made that corrupts them, the parents will play an enormous role in how a child will develop.
I did not question your point but more like wanted to better understand it and now your twisting my words into some white suppremacist bullshit.But you just said you didn’t, and you questioned the validity of what I said, like there isn’t the black doll white doll test, like Jane Elliott and all her talks don’t exist, like decades and decades of research doesn’t exist. You reacted with what you thought instead of what is, and your thoughts literally put black lives in danger, so nice shot with the whole “angry minority” comment too. Any other thoughts you want to share?
It hadn't even occurred to me that the Mattis resignation letter would actually cause Trump to feel insulted and insecure, but now that I know it does, it just brightened my day a little to know it inflicted some suffering on him.
https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1076242012201017344
Trump "hates" the Mattis resignation letter, I'm told. But he "hates" the coverage of the letter even more as he doesn't like the suggestion that Mattis, as well as other senior members of the admin, exist as a check on his go it alone impulses.
you've been here aslong as any of us, you know what resetera isHoly shit can't we discuss without name callings and assumptions?
He's eating Ls left and right these last few weeks.Jesus, why wouldn't Trump just sign the deal? It'd already be out of the news cycle and everyone would be happy, even his base.
Is it bad to hope the stress gives him a coranary?He's eating Ls left and right these last few weeks.
Putin, Xi, Erdogan, and the Cool Actually Authortarian Club in general are pressuring the shit out of him with leverage.
We're now seeing results from his hangers-on and handlers turning on him in the form of unindicted coconspirator designations, plea deals, further raids, new investigations, etc.
The Murderer's Row of New Dem Chairs in the House has finally sunk thru that ratty old naughahyde couch he calls a head.
He's still a malignant narcissist who MUST punch back since he's having a bad week.
It was this year, aka an eternity ago in this, the worst timeline.
Yup just a bunch of dogs and ponies prancing around
Manu Raju @mkraju
McConnell: Senate voted to proceed “in order to maintain maximum flexibility” to cut a deal on funding at a later time. That’s why the Senate voted to take up the House-passed bill. But there is NO agreement on funding. $5B in wall funding has no chance of passage
Republicans are masters at doing a whole lot to accomplish nothing.what a waste of time for everyone. This clearly doesn't have enough support.
They are just doing this as a last ditch attempt to pass on the blame to dems. Doesn't matter, their 40% undying loyalist will eat it up.Republicans are masters at doing a whole lot to accomplish nothing.
House as has adjourned to the day- will not come back until Saturday.
Because Fox and Friends told him not to sign it. Not kidding.Jesus, why wouldn't Trump just sign the deal? It'd already be out of the news cycle and everyone would be happy, even his base.