Unless 2018 works in your favor...If you didn't file a 2018 tax return, I would file a 2019 tax return ASAP (assuming you are eligible). Get going to turbotax or whatever website you prefer
Unless 2018 works in your favor...If you didn't file a 2018 tax return, I would file a 2019 tax return ASAP (assuming you are eligible). Get going to turbotax or whatever website you prefer
Especially when people being fired are losing what little insurance they had.Same, $2500 is going to do fuck all of you fall into the bucket where you have been laid off and don't qualify for unemployment. Those people can't be forgotten. $2500 isn't going to replace a 25k, 30k, 40k, 50k a year income. How do you even find another job in the era of quarantine?
Seriously. It lets so many people fall through the massive cracks. If you are going to add any limit Ian has to be wayyy higher or have no limits and then just do a big tax adjustment for high earners next year.I know three people already who handily make more than $150k/year who have been laid off or are being furloughed indefinitely, and most the ongoing proposals I'm seeing completely leave them out.
I also have a friend who I know for a fact didn't file a tax return last year, but only makes about $30k/year nowadays. She needs that money bad - like always - but honestly probably has a fair bit of job security right now. So she might get screwed, too?
Constraints/means testing on either side I still stand by as a recipe for disaster, anger, and people getting lost in this.
Yeah. In 2018 I made enough to not qualify. So far this year I would've made enough by the time the year was up to qualify even before the pandemic took my work away. Shit sucks man.I know three people already who handily make more than $150k/year who have been laid off or are being furloughed indefinitely, and most the ongoing proposals I'm seeing completely leave them out.
I also have a friend who I know for a fact didn't file a tax return last year, but only makes about $30k/year nowadays. She needs that money bad - like always - but honestly probably has a fair bit of job security right now. So she might get screwed, too?
Constraints/means testing on either side I still stand by as a recipe for disaster, anger, and people getting lost in this.
how will you lose 20k? Investments?I won't qualify. Which is fine, but I'm kinda pissed. We make a lot, so I would rather others get it more. But we will still likely lose $15-20k because of this at least.
We aren't laid off, but all of this turmoil has led to my wife losing shifts at some of the casual places she has. She'll get them back, but until then, she's likely losing 2 months worth of her casual shifts.
Wait so a household of 2 is only gonna get $1500?? UUGHHHHHHHHH
Gotcha.We aren't laid off, but all of this turmoil has led to my wife losing shifts at some of the casual places she has. She'll get them back, but until then, she's likely losing 2 months worth of her casual shifts.
It's all weird though, because if this spikes and they pull her in she'll be in overtime and be making a lot more. She's a nurse anesthetist, so it's kinda a unique situation.
What im confused about is... Wtf was the point of the white house negotiations with pelosi? Did I miss that getting approved by the Senate? Is what's in the Senate something different? Why would the white house negotiate with the house if the Senate was going to do it own thing?
Whatever passes the Senate wether it is an exclusively GOP written bill or not also has to pass the House.
I get that. But why was the white house negotiating with pelosi last week if the gop lead Senate was going to draft it's own version?
I think you're thinking of the other House written bill that was passed and signed into law last week.
I thought it was 1200 each and like 600 per child, tapering off after 75k individually and 150k householdWait so a household of 2 is only gonna get $1500?? UUGHHHHHHHHH
I thought it was 1200 each and like 600 per child, tapering off after 75k individually and 150k household
I thought it was 1200 each and like 600 per child, tapering off after 75k individually and 150k household
She could still late file her 2018 tax return if she withheld enough to cover her tax obligation. However, if she substantially under withheld in 2018 then she'll have more to worry about than getting a 2020 relief check. However, she won't know until she at least prepares a draft return.I know three people already who handily make more than $150k/year who have been laid off or are being furloughed indefinitely, and most the ongoing proposals I'm seeing completely leave them out.
I also have a friend who I know for a fact didn't file a tax return last year, but only makes about $30k/year nowadays. She needs that money bad - like always - but honestly probably has a fair bit of job security right now. So she might get screwed, too?
Constraints/means testing on either side I still stand by as a recipe for disaster, anger, and people getting lost in this.
This is a legitimately important point about how to frame what's going on. "Bailouts" is 100% the wrong word here. The businesses were sound prior to us forcibly having to lock them down. (This was also true of the Auto industries under Obama.)
This is a legitimately important point about how to frame what's going on. "Bailouts" is 100% the wrong word here. The businesses were sound prior to us forcibly having to lock them down. (This was also true of the Auto industries under Obama.)
If we get anything signed this week, I'll be shocked. I hope you all are well.
So, what about the poor who are jobless and most likely are not filing taxes, they are just completely fucked and not getting a cent, right?
Boeing and cruise ships need to be saved though.So, what about the poor who are jobless and most likely are not filing taxes, they are just completely fucked and not getting a cent, right?
I think boeing should be nationalized (lots of jobs and infrastructure there) already but cruise lines are such a waste.
The initial reaction I'm seeing for dems doesnt seem great but I think the perception passes soon as something gets passed. I do think it needs to be done quickly one way or the other. Confidence in the government is going to eradicate quickly if not and it's not like theres a lot of it to begin with. Tragedy and hardship typically promote rallying though.
We don't have time for that, if they go through the usual process it'll be weeks before this is done. Then people will be starving on the streetsPeople really need to stop taking these figures as gospel because right now there's nothing. Things will be proposed, debated, some things removed, some things reduced. That's how the bill gets through.
Dems are fighting the right fight, they just continue to be god awful at messaging.