Are people here seriously complaining that some might have an issue with the democratic party for legitimizing the GOP's islamophobic attacks on omar?
I realize that im on a site where exhaustion from controversy pertaining to trumps continued reign of terror has effecttivly left liberals with nothing to do than resent over why leadership hasn't freed us from this hell-world in exactly the way we dream about on a constant basis.
For a group that spends so much time not defending trump we spend seeming just as much if not more time not talking about him at all.
There's no such thing.
And that's the depressing truth.Trump is going to call for his supporters to commit violence and still nothing will be done to him.
They'd short circuit trying to bend over and talk about how "no I'm the most jingoistic person ever, actually"Oh my god could you imagine if the GOP said the Dems didn't care about 9/11
Yes, that's clearly what's being argued.Nancy Pelosi and Chelsea Clinton worked together to send Trump the edited video, we been knew.
This is islamophobia expressed by the president of the united states. A president who has previously called on his "second amendment people" as a possible solution to a problem.
There is no incredibly similar situation to this. This derail about timing as it pertains to the responsibilities of elected representatives has already blown up the thread. We can move on from it and continue to follow the developments of the president's participation in this, or close the thread since the discussion has veered away from the president's islamophobia and towards Democratic leadership. Your choice.
All i want is our party to have a spine and stand behind Omar. A simple condemnation is not a high bar to achieve.I realize that im on a site where exhaustion from controversy pertaining to trumps continued reign of terror has effecttivly left liberals with nothing to do than resent over why leadership hasn't freed us from this hell-world in exactly the way we dream about on a constant basis.
For a group that spends so much time not defending trump we spend seeming just as much if not more time not talking about him at all.
Okay.
Trump is going to call for his supporters to commit violence and still nothing will be done to him.
It seems like there is far more outrage against Pelosi's lack of support, than for Trump. I don't know whether that's due to Trump exhaustion and endless bar lowering, or double standards for the left vs right. The next news cycle if Pelosi does what you ask:All people are asking for is that the ostensible leader of the left party not be a completely useless piece of shit in the face of racist Islamophobia by the leader of the right party, but I guess even that is a bridge too far for loyal followers of Madame Speaker of the Shades.
Trump is going to call for his supporters to commit violence and still nothing will be done to him.
Trump is going to call for his supporters to commit violence and still nothing will be done to him.
This is called tactically lying so you don't have to make a public statement. She probably saw the clip before a lot of posters here did.
Trump is going to call for his supporters to commit violence and still nothing will be done to him.
This is called tactically lying so you don't have to make a public statement. She probably saw the clip before a lot of posters here did.
He's been condoning it since he was a celebrity in NYC in the 80's. He literally called for five black kids to get the chair. On the front page of the NYT.
There's literally a mod post above that's been replied to multiple times for how dumb it is.I'm starting to feel this forum is not trying to moderate political threads anymore.
The tweet was posted 4 hours ago by the hill and it popped into my timeline. I did not post it to 'stir shit' so kindly stop trying to get me in trouble.How? her response was made before Trump's tweet.
That poster intentionally posted that to stir up shit, and nothing has been done.
I'm starting to feel this forum is not trying to moderate political threads anymore.
Nancy Pelosi and Chelsea Clinton worked together to send Trump the edited video, we been knew.
He's been condoning it since he was a celebrity in NYC in the 80's. He literally called for five black kids to get the chair. On the front page of the NYT.
How? her response was made before Trump's tweet.
That poster intentionally posted that to stir up shit, and nothing has been done.
I'm starting to feel this forum is not trying to moderate political threads anymore.
I'm talking about the CAIR video.This was hours before the clip existed. Inform yourself before talking bullshit.
It seems like there is far more outrage against Pelosi's lack of support, than for Trump. I don't know whether that's due to Trump exhaustion and endless bar lowering, or double standards for the left vs right. The next news cycle if Pelosi does what you ask:
"Pelosi stands by Congresswoman who dismissed 9/11 attack"
The tweet was posted 4 hours ago by the hill and it popped into my timeline. I did not post it to 'stir shit' so kindly stop trying to get me in trouble.
We should just make it a rule to immediately throw under the bus any minority or person of color in office who dares to rock the boat. Can't risk a negative news cycle!Agreed. Standing up to racism might get negative news coverage and we certainly can't have that. Best to capitulate straight away and hope it just blows over. Why must this Omar woman be so uppity? She's making things extremely awkward at the Thursday AIPAC cocktail.
So then posts about actual statements pelosi and others made which have contributed to the fears Trump is stoking with his tweet is still fair game?This was the point I was trying to make, getting too caught up in the "response isn't sufficient until maybe it is" type of back and forth.
I'm glad people still want to discuss what is happening here. Carry on.
Oh no 20 minutes! He might have just walked away to get some coffee.
Way to exaggerate. No one's asking for anyone's head. People are asking for the Democrats to stand up for one of their own.
It was made a day after the NY Post front page. A day after FOX News continued the smearing of Ilhan Omar by calling her un-American. A day after some fake "Imam" who took her out of context got retweeted by a member of the opposing party.How? her response was made before Trump's tweet.
That poster intentionally posted that to stir up shit, and nothing has been done.
I'm starting to feel this forum is not trying to moderate political threads anymore.
Trump is literally just another symptom.I don't understand an unwillingness to engage with the factors that allow an environment conducive and receptive to the bile that the GOP serve up on a daily basis. We can't be outraged at the symptoms while simultaneously ignoring the fact that compromising with them does not seem to be working. We can't claim criticizing Democratic leadership for inadequate responses benefits the right and then normalize the sentiments behind what they are saying. Sometimes looking at how people interpret and respond to the messages that are being put out is more informative than the responses themselves (like with Twitter replies and the kind of signal boosting that happens, unintentionally or otherwise). The things that are said have an effect. A race to the bottom benefits no one but the GOP.
But is it so hard to comprehend twenty minutes is an endless eternity on Twitter and frothy hysteria must be sated immediately else circular firing squads must commence immediately?Way to exaggerate. No one's asking for anyone's head. People are asking for the Democrats to stand up for one of their own.
It's not hard to comprehend.
Well said. There are structural issues at play and being aware of how our side plays into things is important because we shouldn't contribute more to the atmosphere.I don't understand an unwillingness to engage with the factors that allow an environment conducive and receptive to the bile that the GOP serve up on a daily basis. We can't be outraged at the symptoms while simultaneously ignoring the fact that compromising with them does not seem to be working. We can't claim criticizing Democratic leadership for inadequate responses benefits the right and then normalize the sentiments behind what they are saying. Sometimes looking at how people interpret and respond to the messages that are being put out is more informative than the responses themselves (like with Twitter replies and the kind of signal boosting that happens, unintentionally or otherwise). The things that are said have an effect. A race to the bottom benefits no one but the GOP.
It's Twitter. It's not made for normal conversation.But is it so hard to comprehend twenty minutes is an endless eternity on Twitter and frothy hysteria must be sated immediately else circular firing squads must commence immediately?
All people are asking for is that the ostensible leader of the left party not be a completely useless piece of shit in the face of racist Islamophobia by the leader of the right party, but I guess even that is a bridge too far for loyal followers of Madame Speaker of the Shades.
All i want is our party to have a spine and stand behind Omar. A simple condemnation is not a high bar to achieve.
Is integrity attacking her at AIPAC?Republicans have weaponized integrity and we are falling for it.