🚓 🚓 🚓 🚓 🚓
More seriously: GOOD. Far far far too much of this stuff on the net. :/ It needs to be a broad crackdown in general.
More seriously: GOOD. Far far far too much of this stuff on the net. :/ It needs to be a broad crackdown in general.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Twitter annouces it's banning all depictions of child pornography, including loli and shota art
- Thread starter Deleted member 1258
- Start date
Honestly, arguments like "what constitutes as sexually exploitative?" or "this is a slippery slope for stifling artistic expression!!" seem really disingenuous in this context. Is it really THAT hard to distinguish child porn from earnest, legitimate works of art??
Lmao.
That said though, you bring up a point. When are the mods gonna come down on people here on Era? Some real suspect avatars, even just on this page.
EDIT: well last page apparently...
On youtube, yes.
Twitter seems to just be getting in front of it.
I've always disliked porn/hentai on Twitter in general so I can't complain. There are a couple people I follow because we're friends or I like the majority of their art but damn if they don't make me regret that decision when I'm out scrolling through Twitter in public and suddenly a pic of an Undertale character sporting a massive dong floods my screen.
The blatatnly adult midna? Not sure how that looks like a kid in any way.
It's complex because anime.
Maybe they should age up their depictions then instead of drawing Kim Possible as she looked as a teenager in the nude.
Or better yet, just draw Shego; she's better any damn way and an adult without fandom doing an age thing!
It's not. But I mean you know damn well people will spin things as much as possible. The problem is you're thinking about this with a rational mind and things just working out, but no as you can see with how a lot of alt-right spin messages in their favor, human beings will do just do that in general depending on the circumstance.
I personally don't see why everyone has this faith in twitter suddenly. When I see people getting banned then I'll get excited, but nah I ain't till then.
Yes. That's still a depiction, though - and at no point in the book does it say "this guy is bad and lying, he's just a pedophile scumbag." It just trusts the audience that lurid descriptions of the "love affair" should be disgusting you. It's a great book about a nightmare of a person and the victims he leaves behind him, but it's definitely explicit.
It's contextual (like all art). Again, Twitter barring lolicon art won't impact legitimate artistic portrayals like that, and it's weird that anyone would try to use it for them.
I will go out on a limb and say that Lolita would not have been successful if it was a Twitter thread.
Yeah, but it's not like the narration is him even being a decent person trying to paint himself in the best light. That's why I thought it was going to be more about Lolita being a tease justifying his actions. But his actual actions he describes are horrible even if he doesn't always admit how bad they are.
They can't and won't.
What they probably mean is OBVIOUS CP. Things you can tell from a glance. Porn of say Bleach characters or something is all fair game since nobody is gonna be assed to find out how old Orihime is supposed to be
Personally I would have went with the fact that the person you quoted has a nudie Inkling tattoo that was also posted on Twitter and Linked in their era profile at one point
I mean it's complex due to non american non conformative media and artworks, yes.
Forgive me if I doubt twitter's commitment to this when they fail to see this as a racist post.
I expect anyone to be able to pay their way around a ban regarding this, making this a purge of small artists that twitter never cared about in the first place.
She's the worst thing that has happened to DOA, which is saying something. Ugh.
People should pressure the company to either remove the character or at least visually age her depiction up to a reasonable level, instead of trying to have it both ways and be creepy as hell.
Pretty sure last week's stream shenanigans is enough evidence that Tecmo ain't listening.
yeah ppl making those arguments aren't concerned about, like, art in the grander context, they're just mad about their cartoon child porn
As much as I don't like that's character that is definitely not pornography.Yeah like...what happens when this:
Is the postergirl for your video game/anime/movie.
What happens when twitter loses ad dollars because of this move?
I'm genuinely curious because there's so much official shit that revels in sexing up clearly underaged kids and masking in some stupid way and less people then there should be call it out.
Still can't believe Nintendo gave this character the green light.
The fucked thing with Marie Rose and Honoka is that both were 16/17 when they were first created. DOA did a small time skip almost specifically to make them both 18 and thus legal, even though they look exactly the same.
"Realistic depictions" doesn't sound like it includes anime, but if it gets the 1000 year old demons off of Twitter then oh well.
Loli/shota anime art has always been a grey area for various reasons, with various excuses for it (cultural differences, 1000 year old dragon, etc).
At the end of the day, it's extremely creepy as fuck, but technically not illegal since no kids are actually involved. So Twitter never really policed it.
Now they are, which is why certain Japanese illustrators and their fans are freaking out now.
Fuck, that's right.
Granted, it was the Squid Sisters, but that just means it's another Kim Possible situation.
Illustrated is included in "other forms of realistic depictions". "Anime" wouldn't be a realistic depiction.