I hope it'll be easy enough to spot the difference, but I'm curious where stuff like this falls...
But yeah, agree with the move in general.
Well the example I used was from fire emblem which isn't exactly niche...
Common sense hopefully. If you draw a prepubescent kid and tell me she's 18 that's just not going to fly. But we'll see what, if anything, actually happens.
It's why I think this policy will do a whole lot of nothing. Yeah, Twitter can easily go "wtf that little girl is naked and spreading her legs, b&" but a grand majority of this stuff is suggestive. And since Twitter is hilariously inept at this kind of stuff, I can see nothing changing except in extreme cases.
Her design isn't hyper sexualized and her character is much better for it. Her arc has nothing to do with romance either. Still my favorite FE character.
Fair enough. I just think on the topic of underaged porn, coming in and saying you miss Lyn seems to paint the picture that you don't think Lyn is subject to underaged fetshizing.
Oh lol. I saw someone post Nowi earlier and the comment about the newer FE games selling by far the most made me nostalgic for the old gens
Its very optimistic to expect context and nuance on any of these social media platforms. Probably 14th to mid 20th century portraits like this will get a pass even if the actual artist were known pedophiles. But like someone said early in the thread if a Patreon artist did the same portrait in 2019 it would probably be flagged.
Yeah, and the sad thing is that people who consume that kind of stuff accept it just like that.
