.
Good fucking riddance, you creeps.
Just don't touch my Frasier hentai.
I hope not :(The fact they don't say "lolicon" specifically makes me think they are going to allow it still. :/
Let me guess, advertisers pulling their money got this to happen.
The fact they don't say "lolicon" specifically makes me think they are going to allow it still. :/
Is she not an adult? She certainly looks that way.
But yeah, I hope Japanese devs and artists eventually get a kick in the pants to cut this shit out.
You wanna hurt these corps, hurt their wallets.They saw advertisers pulling from youtube and trying to preempt any bad publicity coming their way.
Let me guess, advertisers pulling their money got this to happen.
Yeah I avoided posting here but I'd be pretty annoyed if people got banned for stuff like Kim Possible porn because some Twitter mod looked on a wiki and found her last age to be 17.There is a lot of clearly gross content featuring characters that look obviously underage. Good riddance to that.
At the same time, there are other character depictions that are not so obvious and that creates a gray area that Twitter will have to figure out.
Not because of the "this child is actually a 1000 year dragon" fallacy, mind you. Those are obviously worth banning.
Yeah I avoided posting here but I'd be pretty annoyed if people got banned for stuff like Kim Possible porn because some Twitter mod looked on a wiki and found her last age to be 17.
fucking whatI mean, one of the greatest novels of the 20th century is from the point of view of a child molester so... yeah?
It's a made up example, Kim is 18 by the graduation finale. But still I don't really feel like designs like that should get people in trouble.ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Jesus christ, fuck off with Lolita, that shit was always bad.
I mean, one of the greatest novels of the 20th century is from the point of view of a child molester so... yeah? And even in this thread there's posts about Big Mouth and how that's a show all about child sexuality that Netflix keeps advertising to me.
These are legitimate. Comic books that exist only for internet creeps to jerk off to aren't. A Twitter ban isn't going to harm those legitimate portrayals.
I hope it'll be easy enough to spot the difference, but I'm curious where stuff like this falls...
But yeah, agree with the move in general.
It's a made up example, Kim is 18 by the graduation finale. But still I don't really feel like designs like that should get people in trouble.
Yep. This is the problem with their vague wording.There will for sure be a lot of arguments over what "sexually explicit" means.
Why do you care so much anyway?It's a made up example, Kim is 18 by the graduation finale. But still I don't really feel like designs like that should get people in trouble.
I guess they're just gonna eyeball it and it will determine on whoever comes across a postI'm still not sure how you actually regulate this. When there's no actual age how do you determine one?
Yeah this is why I didn't bother posting, it's an example of a popular character that could or could not break such rules depending on the person enforcing.
You'd be surprised. Especially since lolicon isn't outright singled out, people will try to find loopholes. Reddit they actually mention lolicon is banned, in this message they aren't saying it specifically. It's too vague.I really don't think "sexually explicit" falls under the "vague" category of things.
Officers that's him.Yeah I avoided posting here but I'd be pretty annoyed if people got banned for stuff like Kim Possible porn because some Twitter mod looked on a wiki and found her last age to be 17.
I'm still not sure how you actually regulate this. When there's no actual age how do you determine one?
Midna looks like a child to me tbh, pretty suspect yourself
If youre a creator, I guess by having characters randomly remark about how fun their 18th birthday parties wereI'm still not sure how you actually regulate this. When there's no actual age how do you determine one?
Having just read the book for the first time, I was surprised how it gets portrayed in other media. I was under the impression that the protagonist was seduced by a preteen girl who then gave into temptation. But no, he is a monster that targeted her and she barely showed any real interest in him at first. The writing is beautiful and the actions are despicable. The fact that it is written in the first person and would constitute an unreliable narrator, means the implied actual events were a million times worse.
It is a worthwhile book to exist even if the protagonist is horrible but gives insight into that kind of mind.
Complex lol? Complex as in the 10 year old girl is actually a 1000 year old wizard complex?Yup, a lot of japanese art twitter are talking about jumping to another platform.
This is a complex topic, but I can't help ya'll on this one.