I'd like to ask people, particularly grown-ass males who seem to enjoy the kind of art posted above. Why? What about young girls in seductive poses interests you that much to the point of having that kind of avatar?
Maybe it's normal in Japan or whatever but that doesn't mean it isn't gross and suspect as fuck.
Nothing, the vast majority of fandoms on things like twitter are fans of characters like Orihime.
I mean Yoko from Gurren Lagann is like 15 or something at the beginning of the series and she looks like this.
Yeah, I dont really have an answer for that. Thats very much a Japan and France thing to do in their comics and cartoons.Why even bother making her that age? Is making her even as old as 20 considered too old to jack off too?
"Uh oh, this character appears to be of age. Better dial it back a bit..."
Is making her even as old as 20 considered too old to jack off too?
This is kinda where I'm at, mostly in regard to trying to pinpoint the exact "age" of a drawn character that's depicted as at least in their late teens and having to sift around the "Is it an existing character and if so what's their canonical age, did the artist age them up, did they not age them up but just slapped a 'They're totally 18+' label on it, does it really matter if they're drawn with adult proportions, etc." 20 questions. But at the same time, the fact that someone went out of their way to attribute the age of 14/15 to a character drawn like that? Big yikes.If the """15"""" year old looks like the one above. I don't really care. It's weird that you decided she's 15 but whatever. But when you draw a child and say "oh she's 16 or 25 or 9000 or whatever." No. You drew a child in underwear. You = pedo.
Why even bother making her that age? Is making her even as old as 20 considered too old to jack off too?
"Uh oh, this character appears to be of age. Better dial it back a bit..."
Why even bother making her that age? Is making her even as old as 20 considered too old to jack off too?
"Uh oh, this character appears to be of age. Better dial it back a bit..."
It's just fucking weird.
Like why do grown was dudes have little anime girls as avatars?
As a grown man with a little anime girl avatar, I can explain. Serial Experiments Lain is one of the best animes of all time.
Dunno about everybody else though.
haha I'm not going to start reviewing all this stuff.
Look, I'm sure there's going to be gray area, but that cherry avatar is clearly messed up and sexual.
What point are you trying to make? That the creator of that pic was just trying to show the weather conditions?
It's just fucking weird.
Like why do grown was dudes have little anime girls as avatars?
Its like in the Persona threads when they all argue who "best girl" is but your arguing over a high school student...
You can like cute things but there's clearly a line.
Because they are the new Boogeyman. 'Puritans' and Christian moms USED to be the go-to accuser for censorship of sexual conduct (loli or not) but now that video games have 2 pink haired lesbians instead of 0.5 it's clearly outspoken SJW twitter personalities and tumblrites that are causing their shitty loli to get banned from videogames.It's always funny to see people say it's SJW's fault that things get banned and not like conservative religious people or just the companies that like money and don't want their websites associated with CP in any form since most advertisers and investors don't like that.
Addition by subtraction. Now if we could do something about the nazis and Russian bots
I don't think furries are hurting anybody
People who aren't cool with the sexualization of children.
Who gives a shit.
My picture is there because i think its cool and it has a anime teenage girl on it.
It's stupid that people get all in tizzy for something so mild.
Theres clearly a line but you cant speak on it with 100% honesty because by your definitions having something like a Mikasa avatar from AoT is the same as having a HDxD avatar because there teenagers which is dumb.
If its a sexualized loli or teenager (and not like the avatar being discussed above lol) go ahead and be rightfully upset, but if its something like dragon maid (i dont actually watch DM, just putting an example) where its just cute and nothing else you need get over yourself.
I dont know about persona since i dont play it but most "best girl" discussions that ive seen here are not sexual in anyway, its just a way to express whos your favorite female mc while playing into the my waifu/husbando meme.
This shit will forever be stupid because "anime avatar" emcompases literally the entire medium both good/bad and it makes no sense to be judged over crap you dont engage with.
Big difference, 1-2 are anime girls, they're called kemonomimi, most female and male furries don't like their fursona's drawn that way and are more into 3-4.The furry subculture is a tricky one, there's an extremely wide range between "people who look like humans but with animals parts" to "literally a fox".
I can see people drawing the line at 3-5, but how anthro does a character have to be before it's not a sexualized animal?
And it's not like we don't already incorporate animal traits into some fetishes.
So this seems like a weird tangent to go on.
most female and male furries don't like their fursona's drawn that way and are more into 3-4
3 and 4 aren't animals.Big difference, 1-2 are anime girls, they're called kemonomimi, most female and male furries don't like their fursona's drawn that way and are more into 3-4.
Yeah I thought that was pretty obvious.Yeah it's getting pretty ridiculous here and the ongoing argument about the fucking anime avatar of one user is pretty heavy on semantics. Can we please go on a case-by-case basis here? Especially on ERA? If best waiful/husbando threads are like the ones you see on 4chan where it IS sexual in nature than those users would of long since been banned by now.
Other than that? The devs made those characters to be liked. It doesn't have to be creepy. I don't see people going into shonen anime threads and accusing everyone who likes Deku being a secret teenage diddler.
Use our brains here people.
To me the purely fictional stuff like loli and shots art falls more into the category of thought crimes. Like Guro or simulated dark fetish porn it can be upsetting but I don't really think it should be outlawed either.
That said, banned from Twitter is not outlawed. Twitter can do what they want
Look at furries' avatars in this very forum, they're all 3-4, and anyone with kemonomimi avatars will be the first to tell you that they aren't furs.
Depends on if all that pedo shit is actually harmful, as it might influence them to work themselves up to abusing real children. Last time I discussed this on Reddit it wasn't definitive at all. The studies and information I received wasn't really researched that well, either for or against and there was no clear answer. Plus there isn't going to be any research on it anytime soon.To me the purely fictional stuff like loli and shots art falls more into the category of thought crimes. Like Guro or simulated dark fetish porn it can be upsetting but I don't really think it should be outlawed either.
That said, banned from Twitter is not outlawed. Twitter can do what they want
Yeah I know what it is. But a drawing of a kid is not a real kid. I put it in the same category as simulated rape porn, gore porn, etc. This stuff might be sick but it's still in the realm of fiction and I don't think it should be outlawed or treated as equivalent to actual depictions of children or sexual violence.You understand that the term loli is a short hand for "lolita complex", which literally can only be used in a sexual connotation.
Like, you have to be attracted to it and it has a component of sexualization for it to be a loli.
Otherwise it's just a drawing of a kid.
Yeah I know what it is. But a drawing of a kid is not a real kid. I put it in the same category as simulated rape porn, gore porn, etc. This stuff might be sick but it's still in the realm of fiction and I don't think it should be outlawed or treated as equivalent to actual depictions of children or sexual violence.
But like I said I also get why Twitter wants no part of it.
you're more weird about this distinction than most furries are lmaoBig difference, 1-2 are anime girls, they're called kemonomimi, most female and male furries don't like their fursona's drawn that way and are more into 3-4.