No you didn't, I enjoyed all of them :)
JK Rowling is already the billionaire creator of one of the most successful multimedia franchises of all time, it's a bit late to try and cancel her. Not saying she shouldn't be called out for her bigotry, but what does it actually accomplish? I don't know, everything is just shitty.
she's just a old woman of 120 years old, she doesn't know about these new fangled things like trans lives, non-white people, non-straight people. so she talks about them now and maybe says the right thing like 15% of the timeEvery time she speaks about Dumbledore's sexuality or everything in the Fantastic Beasts sequel it gets worse and worse. What's irritating is exploring Dumbledore's relationship would have been interesting and provide much needed diversity in the series.
She not only follows a bunch of terf accounts and zero pro-trans accounts she has liked anti-trans tweets....Not cover, but hell, the ig message of the book was about respecting minorities. I know transphobic people dont necesarily hate gays (but in my country biggots usually hate both).
But I stand that unless she is supporting these people, or giving messages against tras people this isnt actually supporting them.
JK Rowling is already the billionaire creator of one of the most successful multimedia franchises of all time, it's a bit late to try and cancel her. Not saying she shouldn't be called out for her bigotry, but what does it actually accomplish? I don't know, everything is just shitty.
Do people really follow accounts they don't agree/sympathize with?
Never really bought the "A follow isn't an endorsement" thing (even worse when it's multiple follows).
What a great fucking ally you are 🙄🙄🙄Not cover, but hell, the ig message of the book was about respecting minorities. I know transphobic people dont necesarily hate gays (but in my country biggots usually hate both).
But I stand that unless she is supporting these people, or giving messages against tras people this isnt actually supporting them.
I know a follow isn't an endorsement but when it's this many TERFs and that's pretty much all they post about.... seems mighty suspicious 🤔🤔🤔
There are a looooot more tweets if you click on the thread and scroll down
A bit worrying but I'm not going to condemn someone because of who they follow on Twitter. Actions are what matter to me so I'll focus my hate on those actively trying to hurt the LGBTQ community.
Well her actions have been to follow about 5 anti trans people and follow exactly 0 pro trans people soooo.........A bit worrying but I'm not going to condemn someone because of who they follow on Twitter. Actions are what matter to me so I'll focus my hate on those actively trying to hurt the LGBTQ community.
That's... pretty good. And as a fan of the series, very depressing.
I expected more than this...Well, there was the cultural appropriation of Native Americans from a couple year ago.
Her half baked defense of the whole Nagini casting thing, and being totally wrong on the origins of the Naga, which was actually from India.
And she previously had favourited and followed, and then unfollowed a known transphobe from a couple years ago as well.
Yeah, im a fan of the movies but this really does hit home and marks up a lot of issues with the story (and centrists in general).That's... pretty good. And as a fan of the series, very depressing.
So everyone who follows Trump endorses him? That is a weird take.No, a follow IS an endorsement. Fuck Rowling and fuck TERFs (who aren't feminists, you can't exclude an entire class of women and be a feminist).
Expellurum transphobe
I think a tweet mentioned about how a scene one of her books was pretty transphobic in its own right
Gotta say, the case doesn't look good in my eyes, but maybe others will think differently
There is a difference between following the president of the most powerful nation in the world and a bunch of essentially unknowns who post regular transphobic stuff.So everyone who follows Trump endorses him? That is a weird take.
I support LBGT people, I hope one day (soon) they can get married, adopt, and arent discriminated anwhere (in my country gay people cant even get married yet)
So JK Rowling then. She not only follows a good number of anti-trans advocates (and zero pro-trans advocates) she also has liked anti-trans tweets directly on Twitter.A bit worrying but I'm not going to condemn someone because of who they follow on Twitter. Actions are what matter to me so I'll focus my hate on those actively trying to hurt the LGBTQ community.
Why do you keep ignoring everything but the one follow in the op?But I wont pile somebody I'm a fan, I that I think was a big part on WHY I'm so open minded, just for a twitter follow, now, someone here posted a couple of articles about her doing more than just a follow and I will check that later.
geez, this was a 4chan post?
She was never progressive, I don't know why people thought that. Wishful thinking?
There is a difference between following the president of the most powerful nation in the world and a bunch of essentially unknowns who post regular transphobic stuff.
I mean, is she following them to learn how to fight against transphobes? Keeping up to date with the latest slurs they use?
Or more likely, she agrees with them and follows their accounts because of it?
At this point, if you look at Rowling's history on this, of following transphobic accounts and liking anti-trans tweets, of never standing up for or supporting trans people, and decide that she deserves the benefit of the doubt or that she's some sort of LGBT champion because she said Dumbledore was gay and never actually did anything meaningful with it, you are either willfully blind, staggeringly naive, or deeply suspect.
Again, what a great ally you are 🙄I support LBGT people, I hope one day (soon) they can get married, adopt, and arent discriminated anwhere (in my country gay people cant even get married yet)
But I wont pile somebody I'm a fan, I that I think was a big part on WHY I'm so open minded, just for a twitter follow, now, someone here posted a couple of articles about her doing more than just a follow and I will check that later.
Since well, according to that logic I would be a transphobe If I followed JK Rowling in twitter.
I support LBGT people, I hope one day (soon) they can get married, adopt, and arent discriminated anwhere (in my country gay people cant even get married yet)
But I wont pile somebody I'm a fan, I that I think was a big part on WHY I'm so open minded, just for a twitter follow, now, someone here posted a couple of articles about her doing more than just a follow and I will check that later.
Since well, according to that logic I would be a transphobe If I followed JK Rowling in twitter.
Get in line with the rest of us bro.
Yeah but it was probably just a slip up! Again!You know, I was expecting thinly veiled malicious digs at trans people hiding behind "plausible deniability", but holy shit the vitriol is way more blatant than I'm used to seeing
I mean the people she follows and likes on Twitter are a good place to start then.A bit worrying but I'm not going to condemn someone because of who they follow on Twitter. Actions are what matter to me so I'll focus my hate on those actively trying to hurt the LGBTQ community.
YepAt this point, if you look at Rowling's history on this, of following transphobic accounts and liking anti-trans tweets, of never standing up for or supporting trans people, and decide that she deserves the benefit of the doubt or that she's some sort of LGBT champion because she said Dumbledore was gay and never actually did anything meaningful with it, you are either willfully blind, staggeringly naive, or deeply suspect.
Somewhat unfair to say she never did anything with it. She wrote a movie which came out 8 months ago in which it was a pretty central plot point.