Huh? It's not a negative article. It's just stating that two porno games are top earners, which we have to admit, is unusual in those being so succesful on a plataform with AAA and indie titles. He even jokingly praises the games names.
It's just an informative piece. Not every article has to be about outrage, and the fact that the article does not praise steam does not mean it's negative about the store.
Edit: Also, please note that the list is about "revenue generated during the first two weeks after release." and not concurrent players.
Thank you, I was starting to think I was going crazy here. It's not a particularly negative article at all, and I think it's interesting specifically because Steam has been really inconsistent on how to allow adult content on its platform. I mean I would say if the games in question sound kinda crummy from his description, well, maybe there's a reason for that