On mobile so can't share pics, but it's easy to check on google that both games have pretty different artstyles with different inspirations. On top of that, without even counting BG&E2, it's not their only sci-fi game in dev.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Ubisoft has 2 unannounced AAA games for release by April 2019, more AC: Origins DLC coming
- Thread starter Nirolak
- Start date
I found the last few missions upped levels very quickly but they were all very doable at a lower level. Think it might be to push you towards more sidequests before finishing the game.
Well, I hope it is AC: China.
Origin was great with its non-Western architecture designs and characters. Very refreshing after a decade of playing in the same old same old square Westernized/European environment.
Origin was great with its non-Western architecture designs and characters. Very refreshing after a decade of playing in the same old same old square Westernized/European environment.
It is in development, they updated the ending after launch to hint at WD3's London location.
Since when? As far as we know there were only 2 sci-fi games in development.
Like I said, I was slightly sceptical, but origins ended up having elements of everything. Vast openness, buildings, monuments, different architectural styles.
I am totally down for China/Japan, but wonder if the setting would allow for decent parkour which I was pleasantly surprised by with in Egypt.
Parkour? They better be flying and flipping around in AC: China instead.
Put Wuxia/Kung Fu elements in AC: China and it will be awesome af.
Anyway, the setting shouldn't be a problem. The common theme of ninja running across roof top and jumping over things existed before parkour.
I'd really like one of them to be the rumoured Watch_Dogs 3 set in Brixton, London. That is to Watch_Dogs what AC is to Feudal Japan.
- The most surveilled city in the world (I think, def Top 3).
- Plenty of scrambling/parkour styled buildings.
- GCHQ
- The series has always championed how the player can use non-lethal tactics - well you can't just freely acquire guns in the UK so the player would have to rely on other weapons.
- A setting that absolutely no other developer is doing, nevermind just AAA.
- A complete range of vehicles that suit the city.
- Without sounding like "greetings fellow kids" - Greater London is having a moment right now in pop culture and setting the game here could genuinely give Ubi that trendy/edgy look they go for.
- The most surveilled city in the world (I think, def Top 3).
- Plenty of scrambling/parkour styled buildings.
- GCHQ
- The series has always championed how the player can use non-lethal tactics - well you can't just freely acquire guns in the UK so the player would have to rely on other weapons.
- A setting that absolutely no other developer is doing, nevermind just AAA.
- A complete range of vehicles that suit the city.
- Without sounding like "greetings fellow kids" - Greater London is having a moment right now in pop culture and setting the game here could genuinely give Ubi that trendy/edgy look they go for.
Assassin's Creed: China wouldn't happen anyway unless it was for the PS5. Why build something like that for current gen when it'd need an entirely new everything? Movesets and all.
If anything it will happen now instead of later. Why would they build an entirely new everything for a small next gen userbase. They require a massive player base (ps4, xbox1, pc)
The way that works is that you take the opportunity at the start of the gen to construct all these new assets, that way later on profit margins are higher 'cause you're going to reuse it all for at least a game or two. You're thinking more like Rockstar. Ubi kinda likes being there at the start of a gen because there's not that much support. You're "pushed" to buy their titles because it's either that or CoD or sports.
Yeh ok fair enough. Can work both ways. Look at black flag for example. Naval combat just for one entry? And then we got Paris, which got dropped too after one game.
Yes, VERY good. Just don't go in expecting a game that encourages you to play it like a cover based shooter as Watch Dogs 1 pretty much was. Because while you CAN play it like that, it's really not the "optimal" or even preferred way to play it.
You only got naval combat for one game because they were pushing towards making it a game unto itself. Skull and Bones becomes the second game using that. Was Paris especially unique compared to other cities? Because they switch those all the time, right?
If you hated WD1 then you'll love 2. And vice versa. And like lucebuce said, you can't play it as a cover shooter. Enemies are super aggressive, your health is much lower, and there's no time slowdown ability to save you.
So I'm guessing the two games were Division 2 and a new Splinter Cell.
Kinda wish their unannounced games weren't all Tom Clancy related, but splinter cell is fun.
Kinda wish their unannounced games weren't all Tom Clancy related, but splinter cell is fun.
Ubi is slowly cementing themselves as my favorite 3rd party publisher. Their support of ACO has been great so far, so further DLC is music to my ears.