UK: Julian Assange: Wikileaks co-founder jailed for 50 weeks over bail breach

Deleted member 5028

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
9,724
Via BBC:

Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange has been sentenced to 50 weeks in jail for breaching his bail conditions. The 47-year-old was found guilty of breaching the Bail Act last month after his arrest at the Ecuadorian Embassy. He took refuge in the London embassy in 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden over sexual assault allegations, which he has denied.

In a letter read to the court, Assange said he had found himself "struggling with difficult circumstances". He apologised to those who "consider I've disrespected them", a packed Southwark Crown Court heard.
"I did what I thought at the time was the best or perhaps the only thing that I could have done," he said. As he was taken down to the cells, Assange raised a fist in defiance to his supporters in the public gallery behind him.

They raised their fists in solidarity and directed shouts of "shame on you" towards the court.
I think that means he's not sorry at all.
 

ConanEd

Alt account
Banned
Dec 27, 2018
1,033
So when is he going to be extradited to CIA blacksite to get waterboarded?
 

Ushojax

Member
Oct 30, 2017
4,857
Same reason people still fight for Edward Snowden: people still believe they're heroes for "exposing the truth".
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with supporting exposure of government corruption, incompetence and unethical behaviour, as long as it’s done properly.

What’s strange is the support that Julian Assange, a possible rapist and all-round prick, is still receiving. He’s just a man, a man of utterly compromised morals. We live in a society of laws and due process and he is not exempt from that, he’s just a coward.
 

Daria

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,779
The Twilight Zone
WP:
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was sentenced on Wednesday to 50 weeks in a British prison for jumping bail.

His sentencing comes a day before an extradition hearing in London related to separate charges in the United States of conspiring to hack a government password.

Assange, 47, who appeared at London’s Southwark Crown Court wearing a black jacket and gray sweater alongside a throng of international journalists, had faced up to a year in a British prison for his bail violation — the maximum penalty for such an offense. He broke his bail conditions in 2012 when he fled to the Ecuadoran Embassy in London after Sweden requested his extradition in a case involving sexual assault allegations.

At the trial, his lawyer Mark Summers argued that Assange failed to surrender to a British court seven years ago and so violated his bail because he had a reasonable fear that if he were extradited to Sweden, he would then be extradited to the United States and even sent to Guantanamo Bay.
 

Baji Boxer

Chicken Chaser
Member
Oct 27, 2017
9,521
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with supporting exposure of government corruption, incompetence and unethical behaviour, as long as it’s done properly.

What’s strange is the support that Julian Assange, a possible rapist and all-round prick, is still receiving. He’s just a man, a man of utterly compromised morals. We live in a society of laws and due process and he is not exempt from that, he’s just a coward.
Yeah. The guy they support as some sort of activist journalist has been working with another government that engages in all of the actions they claim to be against. But with even less transparency, no freedom of press, more regressive values, etc.

Also, he (along with Russia) worked to put an aithoritarian in charge who has relaxed our rules of engagement leading to more civilian deaths when in combat, advocated murdering the families of our enemies, is a white supremecist, is maybe the most obstructionist president we've ever had, and attacks the free press and the constitution. They're liars and idiots who fantasize about being part of some grand revolution, yet unwittingly provide support for everything they claim to hate.
 

Umbrella Carp

Banned
Jan 16, 2019
3,265
I have one question about Julian Assange: He spent years inside an embassy because he feared that sexual assault allegations against him were trumped up by deep state forces within the United States so they can get their hands on him and essentially black bag him like they did Chelsea Manning. Then he goes about blowing his credibility by siding with an Ex KGB weasel like Putin in an effort to screw said deep state by getting a firebrand like Donald Trump into the White House and fuck any other consequences of that.

So if and when he is "black bagged", and forced into solitary confinement for excessive amounts of time and denied food and denied basic human rights within Prison, and he eventually gets out and inevitably opens up about his experiences....How the fuck is anyone supposed to believe him after all the shit he has pulled with Wikileaks and Russia??

He fucked over an entire nation just to fight his personal battles while strutting around with this persona of being an ethical "journalist" who only seeks the exposure of the truth....Except of course when truth doesn't side with him. He is a narcissistic, ego-maniacal pariah.
 

captainmal01

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,162
I meant in general.

OP assumes everyone knows of Julian Assange.
While I agree that it can be helpful to put a summary of the person in the OP for more obscure or country specific individuals, this is not one of those times. Julian has had many articles in western newspapers, and if you don't read them, many threads on this website alone. In this case the onus is on you.
 

Palantiri

Member
Oct 25, 2017
537
Hes a rapist who smeared shit all over an embassy and abused his cats
I do not think it is the responsibility of this thread to provide background on who this guy is, especially when he has been a public figure for so long - hell, there is even a movie about him.

However, has rape been confirmed? I do not want to come off as delegitimizing the suffering of victims, but I thought the allegation was that he did not wear a condom when he said he was - which is considered rape in the country he is accused in.
 

SimonChris

Member
Oct 27, 2017
160
However, has rape been confirmed? I do not want to come off as delegitimizing the suffering of victims, but I thought the allegation was that he did not wear a condom when he said he was - which is considered rape in the country he is accused in.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130310021505/http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/assange-summary.pdf said:
“1. Unlawful coercion - On 13-14 August 2010, in the home of the injured party [AA] in Stockholm, Assange, by using violence, forced the injured party to endure his restricting her freedom of movement. The violence consisted in a firm hold of the injured party’s arms and a forceful spreading of her legs whilst lying on top of her and with his body weight preventing her from moving or shifting.

2. Sexual molestation - On 13-14 August 2010, in the home of the injured party [AA] in Stockholm, Assange deliberately molested the injured party by acting in a manner designed to violate her sexual integrity. Assange, who was aware that it was the expressed wish of the injured party and a prerequisite of sexual intercourse that a condom be used, consummated unprotected sexual intercourse with her without her knowledge.

3. Sexual molestation - On 18 August 2010 or on any of the days before or after that date, in the home of the injured party [AA] in Stockholm, Assange deliberately molested the injured party by acting in a manner designed to violate her sexual integrity i.e. lying next to her and pressing his naked, erect penis to her body.

4. Rape - On 17 August 2010, in the home of the injured party [SW] in Enköping, Assange deliberately consummated sexual intercourse with her by improperly exploiting that she, due to sleep, was in a helpless state. It is an aggravating circumstance that Assange, who was aware that it was the expressed wish of the injured party and a prerequisite of sexual intercourse that a condom be used, still consummated unprotected sexual intercourse with her. The sexual act was designed to violate the injured party’s sexual integrity.” (para 3)
The statute of limitation on 1-3 has expired, but 4) counts as full rape and can still be prosecuted. Crucially, it would still be rape even if he had used a condom. Him not even bothering to wear a condom when raping people is simply an aggravating circumstance.
 

Mutedpenguin

Member
Dec 5, 2017
735
If he finds out he is going to be extradicted to the US, I wonder if he'll just try and up his sentence in the UK ?

I mean, if I was in his position and knew I'd end up in a hole and tortured in the US...I'd be tempted to do something while in UK prison to get my sentence extended (maybe pay off another prisoner to let me safely stab him or similar).
 

Palantiri

Member
Oct 25, 2017
537
The statute of limitation on 1-3 has expired, but 4) counts as full rape and can still be prosecuted. Crucially, it would still be rape even if he had used a condom. Him not even bothering to wear a condom when raping people is simply an aggravating circumstance.
Thank you. I had not read that and was only aware of the aggravated element.