Every year the Royal Legion have to keep saying it's a choice whether to wear one or not, and every year millions of baying gammon ignore them.
Yeah, I saw a bit of this on Twitter. Fucking appalling.I don't know whether this belongs here or if it deserves a thread or what, but I saw this story and just feel fucking sick to my stomach and want to vent somewhere.
Laughing party-goers burn effigy of Grenfell in 'callous and sickening' bonfire night scenes.
What the fuck is going on in this country that this happened, someone recorded it, and thought it was fine to share. Abhorrent.
Tbh it probably was, probably a burka """joke""" rather than what you're thinking'"All the little ninjas getting it"'
Somehow I don't think the word was 'ninjas'.
'"All the little ninjas getting it"'
Somehow I don't think the word was 'ninjas'.
You find some people who care enough to try avoiding using the N word (because they know they will get called out for it) will replace it with ninja, as if that somehow changes the fact they actually mean the N word.'"All the little ninjas getting it"'
Somehow I don't think the word was 'ninjas'.
Tbh it probably was, probably a burka """joke""" rather than what you're thinking
I don't know whether this belongs here or if it deserves a thread or what, but I saw this story and just feel fucking sick to my stomach and want to vent somewhere.
Laughing party-goers burn effigy of Grenfell in 'callous and sickening' bonfire night scenes.
What the fuck is going on in this country that this happened, someone recorded it, and thought it was fine to share. Abhorrent.
As if by magic, the perfect tweet about my poppy/nazi hypocrisy.
Yeah I saw that guy with the old 'well technically it's not exactly what you said" to muddy the waters.Some of the replies are magical. I wonder why some bellend would try to defend Nazis by citing what the poppy is meant to remember whilst also being too dumb to google something to see if they've got their information right.
It's not about remembering the dead. It's about trumping how Great Britain is. Kill the Jerries and all that shit. They don't give a shit about anyone, as long as their puffy, rosy cheeks can get drunk on sherry and talk about the good old days.
Nearly 50% of graduates are going into non graduate jobs....new report finds....casting doubt on the value of a lifetime of debt
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-46073769
This is indeed good news. That said, as abhorrent as this act was, it's remarkable that these are, so far, the only arrests related to the Grenfell fire.
Some of the replies are magical. I wonder why some bellend would try to defend Nazis by citing what the poppy is meant to remember whilst also being too dumb to google something to see if they've got their information right.
Readers may recall that we have reported extensively on how Mr Vaz's behaviour on committee trips abroad, paid for by the taxpayer, were the scene for some allegations of not following the rules of the House and bullying towards staff.
Mr Vaz denies all such actions. But we wished to see what documentation existed from the administration of these trips. We cannot.
This is because Mr Bercow has personally intervened and gone out of his way to bar Newsnight from asking the Information Commissioner or a judge to review the decision. We will not be able to overturn this decision, as journalists fought through the courts to get to see MPs' expenses.
Normally, this sort of determination can be referred to the Information Commissioner and then to the tribunals and courts to judge whether that finding is fair. My judgment is, if they did that, I had a reasonable chance of winning.
I suspect Mr Bercow agreed. That would explain why he has now used an unusual personal power to block any appeals.
This week, I was notified he has issued a "certificate" under section 34(3) of the Freedom of Information Act. This is, in effect, a personal release veto.
These sorts of vetos are supposed to be used sparingly - an emergency reserve power to guard sacred spaces if courts get it wrong.
That is because their use means I have no rights of appeal. The Information Commissioner's view is that, since the certificate is genuine, that is the the end of the matter. Any appeal to the tribunals will automatically be discarded. I can ask a judge to review his decision, but it would entail looking at a decision taken by a parliamentary officer. That would hit privilege from another direction.
The net result is that the Speaker, who denies bullying, has made an order to hide information about the behaviour of his close personal friend, Keith Vaz, a man who also denies bullying - supposedly to protect MPs' freedom of speech.
And then he has gone out of his way to use a personal veto to make sure no-one could even consider reviewing that questionable decision
Problem is the people whose say punishment is everything either don't understand or don't care about all of you're valid points. To them, they didn't go out stabbing someone so no one else's experiences couldn't possibly makes sense of it.Whoa, he went far there. Yikes.
Maybe put all the drug users on an island until they get over it.
Don't build houses, build prisons because everyone should be locked up for eternity for all crimes.
Do these people not believe in preventive measures, society issues, nipping it in the bud, it comes from somewhere and will remain that way unless you tackle why it's happening but I guess that takes the 30,000 staff you cut.....the lack of opportunity for kids...poverty....idle hands....gang problems...how about you start there.
The rightwing pressure group the TaxPayers' Alliance has conceded that it illegally sacked the whistleblower Shahmir Sanni for revealing unlawful overspending in the Brexit referendum campaign, in a case that could have a major impact on how lobbyists are described in the media.
Details of the alliance's relationship with Downing Street and the role of Stephen Parkinson, Theresa May's political secretary, will now not be heard in court. A separate claim by Sanni against Downing Street is still ongoing. Sanni, who received an award from Gay Times last week, said: "It has proved that the TaxPayers' Alliance sacked me for speaking the truth. And that there has been a coordinated effort by the Conservative establishment, including the government, to shut me down.
"The TPA claimed to have lost a donor because of my actions. If they had fought the case in court as we wanted, they would have had to reveal who their donors are. That they were prepared to admit their illegal behaviour on all counts shows how far they are willing to go to protect this information.
As he jetted to Paris last Friday, President Trump received a congratulatory phone call aboard Air Force One. British Prime Minister Theresa May was calling to celebrate the Republican Party's wins in the midterm elections — never mind that Democrats seized control of the House — but her appeal to the American president's vanity was met with an ornery outburst.
Trump berated May for Britain not doing enough, in his assessment, to contain Iran. He questioned her over Brexit and complained about the trade deals he sees as unfair with European countries. May has endured Trump's churlish temper before, but still her aides were shaken by his especially foul mood, according to U.S. and European officials briefed on the conversation.
Breaking: Trump actually endorses a bipartisan criminal justice bill (developing story):
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...on-from-conservatives/?utm_term=.2938d958ba96
Five days of fury has him addled?
Points 2 and 3 existing is a contradiction though. If the text is final with no more modifications, what amendments can the HoC possibly make?
They'll find it hard to agree on having Remain on the ballot or not