• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Musubi

Unshakable Resolve - Prophet of Truth
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
23,611
Then you could easily just change Gambling as in "You get 10 cents each time you spin a roulette."
And guess what Blizzard did in China? They found a loophole to keep the loot boxes in the game by skirting around the legalize of the definitions set in place.

This doesn't move the bar at all for this stuff. Maybe the implementation. They aren't going away though.
 

rras1994

Member
Nov 4, 2017
5,743
Again, free to play should be fine. Plus, valve offers transferable ownership I believe- that should also let them off the hook somewhat.
Why would free to play be fine? The reason they gave for banning them is it encourages gambling in minors - why would it matter if the game was free or had a $60 dollar price tag? From their definition it would still be encouraging gambling in children
 

signal

Member
Oct 28, 2017
40,197
Geens, according to the report, wants to ban in-game purchases outright

This sounds bad.
 

Nome

Designer / Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
3,312
NYC
Realistically, developers will just shard off Europe from the rest of the world and publish different versions of games in different territories.
 

Jawmuncher

Crisis Dino
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
38,506
Ibis Island
I'm not sure you're going to like the alternatives.

In China for example, a lot of games just sell VIP subscriptions where you gain an explicit advantage over all players who don't.

Similarly, you can slow progression down to a crawl and sell experience rate boosters.

Or you can just make paid-only weapons that are better.

Sounds like we should just get rid of MP altogether
 

Deleted member 31092

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 5, 2017
10,783
The right thing should be a PEGI 18 or at least disabling lootboxes for minors, and of course releasing the odds.
 

Sanox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,555
Yeah i don't like this. Heavily regulate it but outright banning just means back to no chance of getting cosmetics in game since they are just regular dlc, split communities with map packs etc., the emergence of something worse potentially, higher game prices etc.
 

Deleted member 249

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,828
What indication do you have that free-to-play games would not be affected? If they are talking, straight-up, "If there is a virtual pack you can buy with real money that has unknown contents at the time of purchase, and that is in particular, dangerous for children" then that not only include free-to-play games, but may hit them earlier and harder because a lot of those target kids or are accessible to that audience. At least stuff like SWBF or CoD can say "well we're rated T or M", whereas PaD is rated E for Everyone.
I think because usually they display the actual odds- maybe they are affected, I don't know. Reasonably speaking, a free to play game that displays actual odds should be able to get off Scott free (like TCGs do)
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
but it won't change anything. They'll keep doing loot boxes. China outright banned the sale of such things, and what did Blizzard do? Adapt. You say Blizzard got fucked, but in reality they stabbed at it in another different way and are probably still reaping the profits.

I trust the EU, heck, even America, to implement rules and regulations better than China. The point of watching Blizzard in China is the loot boxes weren't banned, China just said you have to display drop rates. Blizzard went out of their way just to hide their drop rates by reworking their game.

If that doesn't tell you something I don't know what will.
 

hipsterpants

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,581
I'm not sure you're going to like the alternatives.

In China for example, a lot of games just sell VIP subscriptions where you gain an explicit advantage over all players who don't.

Similarly, you can slow progression down to a crawl and sell experience rate boosters.

Or you can just make paid-only weapons that are better.

Sounds like the solution to avoid this stuff is to basically not play multiplayer games. Or limit it to Indies that still avoid it.
 

Deleted member 5491

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,249
Whether or not you can physical items for money if you don't want them seems irrelevant to the idea that spending money on random goods is gambling or would foster a gambling addiction with children. You can win a lot of money at a casino but it is still gambling.
Sure you can win money in a casino that you can use anywhere else but guess what:
You won't get anything any time. With booster packs you always get something for your money and on most of them they tell you the chance of getting an premium card
$_57.JPG
 

Chocobo115

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,311
Sweden
I wonder how publishers Will respond if it gets banned all over europe. Will they raise the prices of the games now? Will they figure our something even scummier now?
 

nycgamer4ever

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
861
I am not sure if it's just me but it seems like the US does a piss poor job of protecting it's citizens from predatory corporate behavior like this.

This is a big win for consumers and I hope it catches on.
 

Mr. Pointy

Member
Oct 28, 2017
5,141
Lootboxes are $1 slot machine where you're guaranteed of getting 2c back a spin. Maybe you get a big pay out once in a while, but the machine is still programmed to only give you ~80c / $1 in the long run.
 

Deleted member 249

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,828
Why would free to play be fine? The reason they gave for banning them is it encourages gambling in minors - why would it matter if the game was free or had a $60 dollar price tag? From their definition it would still be encouraging gambling in children

The article says they are trying to ban all in game purchases. I see no reason this shouldn't also affect free to play.

*shrug*

Ban them outright then. Legitimately, I think that's a loss I'm willing to take.

Have you seen what Call of Duty has been putting in loot boxes?
Do you think it will be sustainable if they outright tell you 'you are at a disadvantage unless you pay $5 for his gun'?
 

PurpleRainz

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,590
Oh man, I just thought of something if they outlaw lootboxes get ready for everything to a be a random drop but you can buy drop rate boosters : )
 

Mobu

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Oct 28, 2017
5,932
"Geens, according to the report, wants to ban in-game purchases outright, and not just in Belgium:"

Doesnt this include every DLC ever? lmao, Thanks Big Brother for telling me how the fuck to spend my money
 

ArmadilloGame

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,070
Not trying to be snarky but how are Loot boxes different from buying a pack of Magic tG cards?
1. It's all on a spectrum. M:TG has always been near the line. Loot boxes are a little further down. As such, they deserve a little more scrutiny.
2. Cards are physical. They never go away, and a secondary market can exist that the manufacturer has no part of.
3. Wizards of the Coast never abused their position nearly as badly as loot boxes have. When something is right on the line of legality, action often comes if the position gets abused. M:TG lets players know the rarity of their cards. It acts honestly in a realm where that has weight. Loot boxes act as ambiguously as possible and squeeze as much profit as possible.
 

Deleted member 1041

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,725
I trust the EU, heck, even America, to implement rules and regulations better than China. The point of watching Blizzard in China is the loot boxes weren't banned, China just said you have to display drop rates. Blizzard went out of their way just to hide their drop rates by reworking their game.

If that doesn't tell you something I don't know what will.

Do you really think Europe and the US would do a better job

really

All that means are different microtransactions for different parts of the world. These regulations don't affect what the US will do, if anything companies will implement one system for Europeans, and another for Americans.
 

Peleo

Member
Nov 2, 2017
2,656
Geens, according to the report, wants to ban in-game purchases outright, and not just in Belgium: He said the process will take time, "because we have to go to Europe. We will certainly try to ban it."

Wouldn't that also include DLC ?
 

Nimby

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,221
I'd say this is bad.. sorry... Say goodbye to free updates to maps, characters, skins ect. Say hello to split communities from expansions and map packs instead.
I feel like Overwatch could still give heroes free, and maps free and have had all additional cosmetic content as DLC. I mean OW is built on the player having access to all heroes, you can't play the game correctly if you had to pay $6.99 to unlock Moira. "I can't switch to Moira because I haven't bought her yet."
 

Musubi

Unshakable Resolve - Prophet of Truth
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
23,611
You can get items you already have, which is the same as getting nothing. So no, you aren't guaranteed shit.

Besides, you are more than likely to not get the thing you want. So you keep gambling until you get it.

In that case of a dupe you still get in game currency which is still getting something.
 

Eumi

Member
Nov 3, 2017
3,518
Have you seen what Call of Duty has been putting in loot boxes?
Lootboxes hide that away though. It hurts less if it's random, because you'll totally get it if you just keep playing, right?

Whereas if they change it to a straight up purchase for an advantage, the community will not react well. Keep in mind this whole thing came about from the community backlash to a much less awful system.