I want to know the name of these officials and their political affiliation.
I want to know the name of these officials and their political affiliation.
In Russian conspiracy land, this guy is supposed to be like a double agent for Semion Mogilevich -- not sure if I believe that but it makes a great twist in the Russian conspiracy narrative
There don't appear to be any ballots left to count in California.
Semi-final turnout: 7.14 million votes cast, or 37.5% of registered voters.
That's a 60% increase from 2014, when turnout was 4.46 million.
It nearly matches the 7.5 million votes cast in the 2014 general election
A hot take for sure, but a pretty astute hot take IMO.The booming economy that Trump inherited from Obama has given him an artificially long leash to implement destructive policies and orchestrate civil divisions.
https://twitter.com/CharlesMBlow/status/1016014086721634309
A hot take for sure, but a pretty astute hot take IMO.
Gotta end sometime.Fox News Research said:Longest streaks of positive monthly jobs growth:
[1] 93 (and counting)
→ Oct 2010 – June 2018
[2] 48
→ July 1986 - June 1990
[3] 46
→ Sep 2003 - June 2007
[4] 45
→ July 1975 - Mar 1979
[5] 33
→ Aug 1940 - Apr 1943
→ Sep 1983 - May 1986
→ Sep 1997 - May 2000
This is why we can't have nice things. Someone like Trump will screw it up in the end.https://twitter.com/CharlesMBlow/status/1016014086721634309
A hot take for sure, but a pretty astute hot take IMO.
Not for lack of trying on Sessions's part.Lest we forget, Trump also nominated Wray, Sessions, and Rosenstein under the presumption that they'd be covering his ass and attacking Hillary, and that hasn't exactly worked out well for him. I still think this fellow is grossly underqualified and Trump is only nominating him because of what he thinks he'll get in return, but it might be he's just a bank lawyer trying to do his job.
It’s almost as if they forget most of this happened under another president. Who they said was awful and destroyed the economy. :thinking emoji:
Even better, I'm 90% sure all of them ended in recessions except, of course, the latest and maaaybe Aug 1940-Apr 1943, but that last one is a special case because WW2 and ramping up production included putting women to work when they generally hadn't been nearly as much.It’s almost as if they forget most of this happened under another president. Who they said was awful and destroyed the economy. :thinking emoji:
Sessions' has shown at the very least that "falling on his sword for the president" is fairly low on his list of priorities. He's keeping his office scandal free so he can execute his gameplan with precision. Trump prefers loyal crooks like Pruitt, who never break rank and flaunt their indecent behavior.
Yeah, the fall is going to be insane.
If we don't bet a blue flood them Russian fuckery happened.
You thinking 10, 25, 39, 45, 48 and 49 flip? Maybe 21?
You have got to be kidding me!?!?!?
Pretty much
Most midterm polling usually does an LV screen by asking if you voted in the last two midterms. That... might not work this time!Pretty much
I really think it’s going to be difficult to poll because we’re going to see sorts of turnouts we didn’t think were possible or votes that weren’t there in certain areas just like in 2016 but in reverse
It already ended last year.
I guess Fox News doesn't count that month's decline because of the hurricanes.The U.S. economy lost 33,000 jobs in the aftermath of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma last month, the first decline since September 2010. The unemployment rate declined slightly to 4.2 percent, the lowest since February 2001.
Analysts had been expecting job growth to slump in September after the one-two punch from the hurricanes. This was worse than predicted: The decline in job growth ended a historic 83-month stretch of expansion, the longest such streak since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began the survey in the 1930s.
Or a toxic work environment. Or both!Turnover is good.
Excessive turnover means you have a shitty hiring practice.
lmao correction incoming in.... jk there will never be a correction.It already ended last year.
U.S. economy loses 33,000 jobs after hurricanes, first decline in seven years.
I guess Fox News doesn't count that month's decline because of the hurricanes.
no pupp... ah fuck it. Just go full puppet and get this over with
No. You are referencing the unrevised numbers. It was revised up the next month to be positive.It already ended last year.
U.S. economy loses 33,000 jobs after hurricanes, first decline in seven years.
I guess Fox News doesn't count that month's decline because of the hurricanes.
WSJ said:Nov 3, 2017 at 9:39 am ET
September Revision Restores U.S. Job-Growth Record
The Labor Department revised September's job loss of -33,000 to a gain of 18,000, restoring the U.S. job market to its record streak of growth. With that revision and October's gain, the U.S. labor market has now grown for 85 consecutive months, the longest uninterrupted stretch of growth on record.
"That's not what I meant!!!!"All of those idiots going “you can’t trust the polls” might end up being right for the wrong reason if the traditional methodology can’t account for the abnormal surge of first time voters we might be seeing.
QP literally the only pollster to figure that out in Virginia.Most midterm polling usually does an LV screen by asking if you voted in the last two midterms. That... might not work this time!
It was revised to +18K the next month.It already ended last year.
U.S. economy loses 33,000 jobs after hurricanes, first decline in seven years.
I guess Fox News doesn't count that month's decline because of the hurricanes.
QP hasn’t been as positive for Dems as other pollsters have been lately so eh.QP literally the only pollster to figure that out in Virginia.
There’s no way in hell the growth streak will last past 2020 - especially with Trump doing all he can to stymie it.Or a toxic work environment. Or both!
lmao correction incoming in.... jk there will never be a correction.
Why does it seem like there's an abundance of cute male Democrats in red states/districts?
Because they're the ones who win, which is why they get recruited?Why does it seem like there's an abundance of cute male Democrats in red states/districts?
Beto is still GOAT tho, dreamboat.Why does it seem like there's an abundance of cute male Democrats in red states/districts?
I include myself in that category, obviously.
Speaking of whom, he trails Cruz by 5 in a recent University of Texas poll.
Beto thrashing Cruz would be the highlight of the night.Speaking of whom, he trails Cruz by 5 in a recent University of Texas poll.
Not sure, I buy it, though. 23% undecided? Cruz only at 41%?
If you say it out loud it won't come true.Beto thrashing Cruz would be the highlight of the night.
Either way I’m staying up the entire night.
Maine brought in AV just to rid themselves of that racist prick this year.http://www.newsweek.com/maine-governor-lepage-vetoes-gay-conversion-therapy-ban-1012981
Vetoing a bill to ban conversion therapy to own the libs and Easy-D.
Term-limited and gives no fucks.http://www.newsweek.com/maine-governor-lepage-vetoes-gay-conversion-therapy-ban-1012981
Vetoing a bill to ban conversion therapy to own the libs and Easy-D.
No. You are referencing the unrevised numbers. It was revised up the next month to be positive.
Ah, I see. I just remembered hearing about the streak ending.It was revised to +18K the next month.
The revisions can be important because the error bar is often +/- 50K which is the difference between a weak or strong month at average job growth.
OK-05 and AR-02 (although the latter has been rated Lean R by Cook and maybe one other forecaster). Also, everyone seems pessimistic about GA-06 now, but I think Handel could still see a shock on election night.I hope there are some districts that are not on the radar now that Democrats manage to pick up in the fall, like during the 1994 Republican Revolution. It would counter the narrative of increasing inflexible polarization, which would be good.
Who could've guessed they'd close ranks and scream, "Fake news"?