• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oct 25, 2017
17,537
95139644449693ebd408c3386d2515fd.jpg

I look for every opportunity to post this
 

Autodidact

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,729
500 responses in KS-02, and the Democrat leads by 1.

EXCELLENT result. We shouldn't be surprised, though. Davis won this district in his 2014 gubernatorial run even as Brownback narrowly won the state.
 

The Namekian

Member
Nov 5, 2017
4,876
New York City


TightFickleEland-size_restricted.gif

Aww, shucks, pack it up folks. It's all over.

I actually think that tweet, batshit as it is, is instructive. He thinks the only way the Mueller can win is to take down Trump. It hasn't occurred to them that he's prosecuting and investigating a foreign nation attack our election. Or that a "win" for Mueller would also be to declare there is no evidence against the president, were that the case.

It's completely impossible for him to see the situation as it is.


Is he trying to be quoted in a Trump tweet? Cause this stinks like a Trump Tweet retweet?
 

Diablos

has a title.
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,574


TightFickleEland-size_restricted.gif

Aww, shucks, pack it up folks. It's all over.

I actually think that tweet, batshit as it is, is instructive. He thinks the only way the Mueller can win is to take down Trump. It hasn't occurred to them that he's prosecuting and investigating a foreign nation attack our election. Or that a "win" for Mueller would also be to declare there is no evidence against the president, were that the case.

It's completely impossible for him to see the situation as it is.

Who is this guy and why should I believe him
 

GrapeApes

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
4,491

In the second year of his presidency, Mr. Trump has largely tuned out his national security aides as he feels more confident as commander in chief, the officials said. Facing what is likely to be a heated re-election fight once the 2018 midterms are over, aides said Mr. Trump was pondering whether he wanted someone running the Pentagon who would be more vocally supportive than Mr. Mattis, who is vehemently protective of the American military against perceptions it could be used for political purposes.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/15/us/politics/jim-mattis-trump-defense-relationship.html
 

Diablos

has a title.
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,574
He's a hack conservative radio host from New York. It's red meat for his/trump's base, not something meant to be believed by most people.
Oh right I should've known

Because you know Mueller and his crew aren't the type to leak "fuck we need to land this plane there's nowhere else to go"

That said if he does come up short? Please wait until after the midterms
 

III-V

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,827
I would love to see twitter folks posting sources. Its all hearsay or complete bullshit when scientific analysis is challenged. And people go for it!
 

Antrax

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,270
Flip flip flip Ivankia

Should've been "The Gang (Doesn't) Solve the North Korea Situation"


If Beto wins the TX Senate his popularity is going to soar. I think people will be surprised, it's going to rise fast. He'll be added to these lists. I don't think he'll run though. It's hard not to watch Beto and not like him.

I'm about 75% sure it's going to be Harris in the end.

If he wins, he should park his ass there for as long as he can. Holding TX would be amazing.
 

Stinkles

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,459
95139644449693ebd408c3386d2515fd.jpg

I look for every opportunity to post this

Wait - this finally breaks his cycle of zero joke plus literal signs on things. There's something arguably related to, but not quite a joke about the fact that Witches are hunting Trump , rather than Trump being a witch.

There's always the possibility that he just doesn't understand the term "witch hunt" I suppose....
 
Oct 25, 2017
11,573
The problem with taking every word of the Tangerine Nightmare as gospel truth... is taking every word of the Tangerine Nightmare as gospel truth.

Also, Presidential Alerts aren't going to end well for anyone.
 

ImTheresaMay

Banned
Jan 15, 2018
523
If Dems gain both houses of congress, what are the odds that Trump pulls a Slick Willy after 1994 and acquiesces to Democrats demands on major legislation for the following two years?
 

Amibguous Cad

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,033
Got a sad story for you

In the next 2-6 years, people will be so frustrated with the current administration and GOP that they'll elect a Democratic President with a fully Democratic Congress

That President will have an insanely productive first two years that will grind to a screeching halt after their first midterm election when the Republicans win back one or both houses of Congress due to voter apathy

They'll still get to serve a second term, but accomplish little to nothing in the remaining 6 years

And then their successor will be deemed too boring and centrist by the young electorate who will largely sit out the election or vote third party, leading to President JonTron winning the Electoral College while losing the popular vote

Prove me the fuck wrong, America

It could be even worse. After Trump leaves office is when you learn what political opinions were held because they made scoring points easier, and which ones were sincere.

Immigration motivates the Dem base now, but without a racist in chief, it becomes an issue that many Democrats are content to leave on the back burner, particularly as President Gillibrand lurches from one foreign policy crisis to another brought about by Trump's poor management. She comes in promising to end the camps at the border, and does manage to reunite a few more minors with their families, but local NIMBYism and the legal quagmire makes them almost impossible shut down. Family reunification goes from signature campaign promise to second-tier priority to something the administration and loyal democrats both prefer not to think about. When an influx of immigrants occurs in 2025 as a result of instability in central America, the camps start to grow again, and by this point immigration advocates find no support from a coalition that just wants the issue to go away so President Gillibrand can deal with the debt crisis. The 2028 Republican Presidential candidate intends to expand the camps and revive their worst excesses.

Someone who was 10 years old at the time will remind people on PoliERA that Kaepernick should have been more mindful of the public's sensitivities, so soon after Ferguson, after all. People will nod sagely, because the message he was delivering no longer seems as salient and because the people defending him sound a little bit like obnoxious right-wingers that insist on the right to be offensive in order to speak the truth.

The 2028 Presidential Candidate for the Democratic Party will have taken a controversial vote to approve funding for a border wall in 2019. People will be very cross when you question her progressive bona fides because of it.

Internet leftists will begin mocking the "rule of lerrrr." You share the distaste for right wingers appropriating the concept and screaming about it every time the government exercises any discretion whatever in executing its powers, but the arbitrary exercises of power it encourages will make you uneasy.

(Respectively, Guantanmo, Maher, Clinton's vote for the Iraq War, "Freeze Peach")
 

Deleted member 3082

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,099
My dream scenario

Manafort implicates Jr and Kushner, Jr flips on his dad (immediately) to avoid jail time, Kusher flips on Ivanka, Ivanka flips on Trump, Trump goes on twitter rants about how he never loved Jr or Ivanka and how disappointed he is, Trump losses in 2020 and goes to jail, Trump family tears each other apart and fights over the scraps that the government doesn't seize.

Justice.

Post Credits Scene:


CUT TO:
A dark room, lit by the orange sodium glow of street lamps outside and the soft glow of a flat screen television within. The windows are barred. In the dim light we see walls adorned with positivity posters and furniture without sharp edges, everything safe and soothing; a mental institution. The television is set to some 24/7 news channel and chattering incessantly about the events we've just witnessed.

At the very edge of the illumination we see a solitary figure, seated in a folding chair, listening intently as the television details the collapse of the president and his children. The camera TURNS SLOWLY around the figure, who is hunched over and shaking as though crying. As we pan around, the camera ZOOMS IN to show the barely-illuminated face; in the soft light only flashes of blond hair are visible at the very edges.

NEWS PUNDIT (O.C)​
... spells the end of the Trump Family. We'll be right back.

The glow of the television suddenly increases as the program cuts to commercial, and the increase in light reveals more of the woman's face; eyes bloodshot and puffy from crying, eyeliner streaking down her face, but rather than sadness we see a manic joy; behind the eyes burns a madness unfurled. The figure is no longer crying but laughing, cackling as though completely unhinged. The camera pans downward, past white teeth clenched in a psychotic smile, the blue hospital gown flecked with old, dried spit and more than a little blood, to a name tag:

HI, MY NAME IS
TiFfanY

A DRAMATIC DRUM BEAT as we CUT TO BLACK:

Tiffany Trump (O.C)​
(whispering) I'll fix everything... (a pause)
Daddy.
 
Last edited:

Jupiter IV

Member
Jan 6, 2018
1,220
If Dems gain both houses of congress, what are the odds that Trump pulls a Slick Willy after 1994 and acquiesces to Democrats demands on major legislation for the following two years?

I'm going to say screw the GOP and don't play ball. Only pass any required legislation to keep things running and the things conservatives absolutely hate with all their being.

They will turn it around and say look how great Trump is, the great negotiator, he's such a good President passing all these bills, imagine if we had Republican control of Congress (Democrats are "obstructing" right now so it doesn't count).
 

Absent

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,045

This is...
The fate of Mr. Mattis is important because he is widely viewed — by foreign allies and adversaries but also by the traditional national security establishment in the United States — as the cabinet official standing between a mercurial president and global tumult.

"Secretary Mattis is probably one of the most qualified individuals to hold that job," Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in an interview. His departure from the Pentagon, Mr. Reed said, "would, first of all, create a disruption in an area where there has been competence and continuity."

But that very sentiment is part of a narrative the president has come to resent.
As the Trump transition official responsible for Pentagon appointments, Ms. Ricardel stopped Mr. Mattis from hiring Anne Patterson as under secretary of defense for policy, one of the department's highest political jobs. Ms. Patterson was a career diplomat who served as an ambassador under Presidents Bush, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, but administration officials said Ms. Ricardel suspected Mr. Mattis was trying to load up the Pentagon with Democrats and former supporters of Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign.
In July, the president blew up a NATO summit meeting that Mr. Mattis and other national security officials had worked on for months. The Pentagon chief and others saved the final agreement only because they shielded it from the president and urged envoys to complete it before Mr. Trump arrived in Brussels.
Meanwhile, Mr. Mattis has begun questioning the efficacy of Mr. Trump's decision to pull out of the Iran nuclear deal — a move that, again, was made against his advice. Mr. Mattis has told aides that he has yet to see any difference in Iran's behavior since Mr. Trump withdrew the United States from the agreement between world powers and Tehran.
wild.
 

Antrax

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,270
If Dems gain both houses of congress, what are the odds that Trump pulls a Slick Willy after 1994 and acquiesces to Democrats demands on major legislation for the following two years?

Zero. It'll be a period of pure politicking. We'll pass bills to play to the base (like they did with all the ACA repeals under Obama) and never even bring up bills he wants. He'll lurch into campaign mode pretty quickly, and continue tweeting. Ideally we use that to win any 2019 contests, and then it'll be full steam to November 2020.
 
Feb 14, 2018
3,083
Zero. It'll be a period of pure politicking. We'll pass bills to play to the base (like they did with all the ACA repeals under Obama) and never even bring up bills he wants. He'll lurch into campaign mode pretty quickly, and continue tweeting. Ideally we use that to win any 2019 contests, and then it'll be full steam to November 2020.
I wonder if he'll refuse to sign a spending bill and shut down the government.
 

VectorPrime

Banned
Apr 4, 2018
11,781
no california stays as is.

we could get 6. inhabited territories + dc.

There's no way that you can rationally justify giving every individual US territory full representation in the Senate. It's already ridiculous that a state like Wyoming with all of 500k people gets equal representation. Now you want to argue that Somoa, with less than a tenth of that should get it? Same with the Marianas and Virgin Islands. Now you might want to argue that the Pacific territories could be combined to be one state but that wouldn't make any sense on a logistical level let alone culutural one.
 

Kaitos

Tens across the board!
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
14,705
This is an incredible map and has huge implications for 2018 and forward.



Gotta agree with this.

 

louisacommie

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,566
New Jersey
There's no way that you can rationally justify giving every individual US territory full representation in the Senate. It's already ridiculous that a state like Wyoming with all of 500k people gets equal representation. Now you want to argue that Somoa, with less than a tenth of that should get it? Same with the Marianas and Virgin Islands. Now you might want to argue that the Pacific territories could be combined to be one state but that wouldn't make any sense on a logistical level let alone culutural one.
No ones going g to be angry enouph about every territory being it's own state
 
Status
Not open for further replies.