It's 2019, a woman of color can exploit the worst of humanity to win the presidency just as well as any man, thank you.Tulsi has tweets from Richard spencer and David duke supporting her. Why is she even bothering.
It's 2019, a woman of color can exploit the worst of humanity to win the presidency just as well as any man, thank you.Tulsi has tweets from Richard spencer and David duke supporting her. Why is she even bothering.
Lip service at best. It will just be a segue into how economic instability affects us all.Beto will defeinietly do it as he's already done it. But will Bernie I wonder?
2015Beto will defeinietly do it as he's already done it. But will Bernie I wonder?
Ah the days when women were dragged by media for saying they will not sit home and bake cookies. Which is ironic because Hillary won the cookie bakeoff that year.
I really don't think we've come much further since then. AoC would get in same hot water if she uttered what Hillary said.
Yeah, it was a different topic that got scrunched into that one, but then I didn't have anything to add or really any point to make with it, so there was no sense leaving it up. Sorry you caught it before I could actually fit in the right response for what I quoted.
Reminds me of the kids in Ender's Game
She was not disparaging stay at home moms. She was breaking the gender roles: women were expected to stay home and bake cookies and leave the oh-so-important part of having a career and working to the man of the house. I don't see what she said as wrong. America and the media did not know what to make of this sharp lawyer from Little Rock who broke every stereotype. So they cast her as a demon and unamerican.Well part of the problem was Hillary's comment was insulting to, well, women who stayed home and baked cookies. There's nothing wrong or inferior about being a homemaker if that's what you choose to do. Hell the days I stay home with the kids, I wish I was working instead, it's not like it's an easy thing to do. Hillary could have made her point in a way that didn't disparage stay at home moms. Hopefully AOC doesn't make a similar mistake
It's a public access channel that televises federal government proceedings.
They still shouldn't be using Twitter polls, but they aren't using it for anything other than social media engagement.
Their networks also stream the parliamentary proceedings of other countries (namely Canada, UK, and Australia) and they have some big standard public affairs programing, like call-in shows and mini-docs.
She was not disparaging stay at home moms. She was breaking the gender roles: women were expected to stay home and bake cookies and leave the oh-so-important part of having a career and working to the man of the house. I don't see what she said as wrong. America and the media did not know what to make of this sharp lawyer from Little Rock who broke every stereotype. So they cast her as a demon and unamerican.
A criminal probe, a counterintelligence probe, an obstruction probe.
A criminal probe.
A counterintelligence probe.
An obstruction probe.
Are you getting it? These are not three separate probes, this is one probe, and we are calling it treason.
And we think you're going to love it.
The Bern is gonna have to release his tax returns for real this time
Yeah, compare the answer Bernie gave in 2015 to the answer Pelosi gave in 2018 three years later.Reminds me of the kids in Ender's Game
Some people have built up a caricature of Bernie in their heads that is just completely disconnected from reality
I really need Tammie Brown worked into this somehow because of her Tootsie-Loo catchphrase.
It's one of those things where it's easy to be misinterpreted badly. Like last year, when Stacey Abrams said we needed jobs in Georgia besides farming and hospitality, it was easily twisted into a disparagement of those jobs. She didn't mean that we didn't need farming, but people who wanted to twist it into that, did so.Well part of the problem was Hillary's comment was insulting to, well, women who stayed home and baked cookies. There's nothing wrong or inferior about being a homemaker if that's what you choose to do. Hell the days I stay home with the kids, I wish I was working instead, it's not like it's an easy thing to do. Hillary could have made her point in a way that didn't disparage stay at home moms. Hopefully AOC doesn't make a similar mistake
President Trump has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal details of his conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, including on at least one occasion taking possession of the notes of his own interpreter and instructing the linguist not to discuss what had transpired with other administration officials, current and former U.S. officials said.Trump did so after a meeting with Putin in 2017 in Hamburg that was also attended by then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. U.S. officials learned of Trump's actions when a White House adviser and a senior State Department official sought information from the interpreter beyond a readout shared by Tillerson.The constraints that Trump imposed are part of a broader pattern by the president of shielding his communications with Putin from public scrutiny and preventing even high-ranking officials in his own administration from fully knowing what he has told one of the United States' main adversaries.As a result, U.S. officials said there is no detailed record, even in classified files, of Trump's face-to-face interactions with the Russian leader at five locations over the past two years. Such a gap would be unusual in any presidency, let alone one that Russia sought to install through what U.S. intelligence agencies have described as an unprecedented campaign of election interference.This is insane.
Trump response: it was classified/executive privilege
President Trump has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal details of his conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, including on at least one occasion taking possession of the notes of his own interpreter and instructing the linguist not to discuss what had transpired with other administration officials, current and former U.S. officials said.Trump did so after a meeting with Putin in 2017 in Hamburg that was also attended by then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. U.S. officials learned of Trump's actions when a White House adviser and a senior State Department official sought information from the interpreter beyond a readout shared by Tillerson.The constraints that Trump imposed are part of a broader pattern by the president of shielding his communications with Putin from public scrutiny and preventing even high-ranking officials in his own administration from fully knowing what he has told one of the United States' main adversaries.As a result, U.S. officials said there is no detailed record, even in classified files, of Trump's face-to-face interactions with the Russian leader at five locations over the past two years. Such a gap would be unusual in any presidency, let alone one that Russia sought to install through what U.S. intelligence agencies have described as an unprecedented campaign of election interference.This is insane.
Why am I not surprised.Still, in the current climate Gabbard is aware that Democratic voters are drawn to politicians who seem to be leading the resistance to Trump and the Republicans, rather than searching for ways to work with them. Many of her supporters believe that, eventually, the mood will change. "At some point," Van Jones says, "the country's going to be tired of people whose only qualification is that they hate the other side."
Van Jones likes Tusli Gabbard? Bruh, you were supposed to not suck.
Van Jones sucks thoVan Jones likes Tusli Gabbard? Bruh, you were supposed to not suck.
This is true. Forgive me, it's been a long 20 years.
Lemon it's been 2 weeks