If the Democrats nominate David Duke as their candidate for President, am I obligated, in your view, to vote for him to drive Trump out of office?
I see Rudy is doing his thing again
edit: video
more rudy: "there is not a shred of evidence the president committed the only crime you could commit here, conspiring with the russians to hack the DNC"
Oh, I don't think he has a chance either. He did get some media coverage when he declared but as others are declaring it's faded pretty fast.I'm just speaking anecdotally but the only place area I frequent (news sites, twitter or cable TV) where I see any mention of Ojeda is here. As some one mentioned earlier, I view him like Jim Webb. I see absolutely no chance of him winning and he takes up little to none of my thoughts. jmo
How about someone like any of the serious Dem contenders that aren't a literal white supremacist? What are you doing?
No but you're probably internally obligated to justify this fucking trashfire strawman. Or delete your post history. Or block me.
PIGEON: Voting third party to defeat Nazis. I wish I was exaggerating this position.
It sure is a signal to Manafort that he is will and truly Manafucked, that's for sure.So now we are at
There was collusion
But just the Trump Campaign colluded
And Trump was blissfully unaware
How about someone like any of the serious Dem contenders that aren't a literal white supremacist?
That, to me, just doesn't fall in line with how people operate. When an elderly person with an AOL account responds to a "Nigerian prince", they don't want to be cheated out of their retirement money, they want what the scammer is promising at face value. People in desperate situations are prone to making bad decisions, this always has been and always will be true.What does "rectified" mean here? They were pretty foreseeable outcomes. People said this stuff would happen at the time. So I don't really know why you would expect him to feel bad about the camps. I assume he wanted them built and wanted the kids kidnapped. Why would you assume otherwise?
Yep, she said in her first sentence about being a blue-dog (concerning gun regulations) "I was wrong".Gillibrand is on MSNBC talking about her transformation from a Blue Dog and other stuff. Might be a good idea for those interested in hearing from her to tune in.
To be clear, I'm leaning toward Kamala at the moment and Ojeda isn't even in my top five."Oh, just vote for the white supremacist who isn't quite as brazen about it as Trump" is the wildest "stereotypical white liberal dismissal of racism" position I've seen "allies" defend in awhile.
That, to me, just doesn't fall in line with how people operate. When an elderly person with an AOL account responds to a "Nigerian prince", they don't want to be cheated out of their retirement money, they want what the scammer is promising at face value. People in desperate situations are prone to making bad decisions, this always has been and always will be true.
"Oh, just vote for the white supremacist who isn't quite as brazen about it as Trump" is the wildest "stereotypical white liberal dismissal of racism" position I've seen so-called allies defend in awhile.
Also, to be clear, none of the other serious Dem contenders would be appropriate here, since Ojeda is the only candidate who would drive me to leave the Democratic Party. I said in December of 2016 my one true fear is that Dems would respond to Trump by moving to recapture the white supremacist vote and normalize white supremacy. Ojeda is that candidate, in my view.
(I guess Gabbard would also present a real pickle if she got nominated. Not really sure what I would do there given her LGBT stances. I would probably ask people I trust for their views before making a final decision.)
No feelings, huh.No feelings about Gillibrand until this interview and Jesus crimeny is she coming off as a disingenuous carpetbagger. This is brutal
"Oh, just vote for the white supremacist who isn't quite as brazen about it as Trump" is the wildest "stereotypical white liberal dismissal of racism" position I've seen so-called allies defend in awhile.
I'm not voting for his ass. Who's saying just vote for him. And how is a third party in this moment an "allied" position?
I'm using an extreme argument to make a point about the unreasonableness of a general principle. It's pretty simple.
Okay, so we agree that there is a point of candidate loathesomeness at which voting for the Democratic Party would not be justifiable or required, right? I'm arguing that Ojeda is past that point. If you disagree, you should say why.
If both parties nominate Nazis, that seems like the right response. Doesn't it?
The same way millions of black and brown people would stay home and still be allies lmao.I'm not voting for his ass. Who's saying just vote for him. And how is a third party in this moment an "allied" position?
Ojeda is trash but voting third party is literally worse. We're not finding common ground on this in 2019 or 2020. I'm sorry but that's where I'm at on the logic.
Are you fucking high? Literally this entire discussion is predicated on you accusing me of being a bernie bro because I said I would vote third party rather than vote for Ojeda for President. How is that not "just vote for him?"
So UnapologeticallyBLK's characterization of your position is correct, right?
I mean, you'll have to explain to me how 16% of black men with college degrees and 1/3 of hispanic people voted for him if we live in a world where every person clearly understood Trump to be a white supremacist on the day of the election. I think you are kind of overestimating how attenuated a lot of people are to dog whistles and other such things that us politico types are hyper-aware of.Trump promised, explicitly, to be a white supremacist. It was a major theme of his campaign. That was the face value reading. By your own argument, the only way in which people got conned is that they wanted Trump to take stuff from people of color and give it to them, and he mostly screwed people of color without helping them.
Some of these people are fine with white supremacy. There it is.I mean, you'll have to explain to me how 16% of black men with college degrees and 1/3 of hispanic people voted for him if we live in a world where every person clearly understood Trump to be a white supremacist on the day of the election. I think you are kind of overestimating how attenuated a lot of people are to dog whistles and other such things that us politico types are hyper-aware of.
Remember when JonTron debated on twitch for two hours about how he's genetically inferiorSome of these people are fine with white supremacy. There it is.
Its like Gillibrand is copping Warrens Maddow interview positions.
Some of these people are fine with white supremacy. There it is.
Likely true.Teggy said:
I would not be surprised if he was operating on some kind of "I'm not a minority, I'm JonTron" mentality.Remember when JonTron debated on twitch for two hours about how he's genetically inferior
I can't find that graph/study showing that greatedr white ID->more conservative voting among Hispanic voters and now I'm mad I don't have it bookmarked.Some of these people are fine with white supremacy. There it is.
So now we are at
There was collusion
But just the Trump Campaign colluded
And Trump was blissfully unaware