Not surprised on the Sanction thing.
but it tells me, that, there are between 11 and 20 gop senators not compromised
but it tells me, that, there are between 11 and 20 gop senators not compromised
Republicans at the time didn't realize how much their party was taken over by TrumpDidn't the previous russian sanctions pass by a pretty healthy margin? What changed?
@mkraju
Senate Intel Chairman Richard Burr WON'T pursue notes from American interpreter at the Trump-Putin meetings.
"If I were the president, I would try to claim executive privilege in anything that had to do with him."
Asked if he would try to get those notes, Burr told me: "No."
https://twitter.com/intent/like?tweet_id=1085605599092658181
1:31 PM - Jan 16, 2019
Perhaps I'm reading into things, but if they're willing to stand with him on this, I don't see a veto proof majority defecting on the shutdown for a long while
Didn't the previous russian sanctions pass by a pretty healthy margin? What changed?
Didn't the previous russian sanctions pass by a pretty healthy margin? What changed?
Trump has basically two options here:
An excellent visual example of the changing modern economy over the past 70 years:
An excellent visual example of the changing modern economy over the past 70 years:
@seewhatsnext
.@SteveCarell will star in a new workplace comedy series he co-created with #TheOffice's Greg Daniels about the people tasked with creating a sixth branch of the armed services: the Space Force!
12:59 PM - Jan 16, 2019
They don't need a veto proof one. He would never veto it. Just needs enough to break his talking points of "Republicans are united" and show to the the average person that a strong bipartisan majority is for opening govt, and he's the obstacle. Same with McCoonel.Perhaps I'm reading into things, but if they're willing to stand with him on this, I don't see a veto proof majority defecting on the shutdown for a long while
Cracks are beginning to appear all over the place. I don't see the shutdown lasting past the first week of Feb at this point.
If the GOP/Trump were slowly gaining ground in the messaging war, then maybe this could keep going on for months. But it's the opposite, the GOP are on a ship that's slowly sinking. The Trump Admin has been trying to plug all the holes to stay afloat, but they're running out of fingers. A combination of deteriorating poll numbers, TSA workers beginning to leave in mass, and rising bad publicity from local news channels, I think we're entering the final 2-3 weeks. Pelosi's gambit just further solidifies that Trump is fighting from a position of weakness.
Their base won't punish them for it because they don't care about anything other than white supremacy and owning the libsCan someone carefully explain to me how republicans can get away with the shadiness of voting to lift those sanctions and their reasoning for doing so
But what's the reasoning they can possibly give, in public, for doing thisTheir base won't punish them for it because they don't care about anything other than white supremacy and owning the libs
They're either compromised themselves (see NRA), or they think risking civil war is worse than letting Russia fuck with our election (because even if they're not directly compromised, they benefit by being in the party putin supports)WTF, are Republicans at the point where they just accept they are controlled by Russia and will require their help in upcoming elections?
Also "liberal" media doesn't care and is afraid of pushing the issue or calling a Spaid a spaid because they don't want to seem partisan or somethingTheir base won't punish them for it because they don't care about anything other than white supremacy and owning the libs
Can someone carefully explain to me how republicans can get away with the shadiness of voting to lift those sanctions and their reasoning for doing so
His plan would keep intact earlier U.S. sanctions against Deripaska himself, but the Treasury Department decided to remove financial restrictions on the three companies following an agreement to significantly reduce the oligarch's ownership stake. Aluminum producer Rusal is among the largest companies the U.S. has ever put on its sanctions designation list, and the action caused its shares to plummet.
Mnuchin has said that Deripaska, not the companies, was the intended target of U.S. sanctions imposed in April on associates of Putin over Moscow's interference in the election. Under Deripaska's agreement with Treasury to remove sanctions from the three companies, the oligarch would cut his ownership shares to about 45 percent of each company, the boards of En+ and Rusal would be overhauled, and they would submit to Treasury audits.
Can someone carefully explain to me how republicans can get away with the shadiness of voting to lift those sanctions and their reasoning for doing so
What exactly are people trashing Beto for now? As someone fairly clued into politics, I think I've missed like half of these Beto scandals from the last few weeks.
What exactly are people trashing Beto for now? As someone fairly clued into politics, I think I've missed like half of these Beto scandals from the last few weeks.
Thank you, reading nowThis article is a good starting point:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/04/world/europe/oleg-deripaska-russia-oligarch-sanctions.html
There really aren't that many scandals. It just seems like a whole bunch to someone who's constantly following the 24/7 cycleWhat exactly are people trashing Beto for now? As someone fairly clued into politics, I think I've missed like half of these Beto scandals from the last few weeks.
the day of this dinner, July 7, 2017, the New York Times contacted the White House for comment on a story they were about to break—that Donald Trump, Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort had a secret meeting at Trump Tower in June 2016 with Russian lawyer Natalia V. Veselnitskaya
That call from the New York Times must've set off some panic because Donald Trump's behavior started to get incredibly suspicious on July 7, 2017:
The following day, July 8, 2017, just before the New York Times published the story, Donald Trump personally dictated a statement as cover for Donald Trump, Jr.
- He confiscated the interpreter's notes and instructed her not to brief anyone on the discussions with Putin and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov
- He desperately sought Putin's attention at the formal dinner, gesturing "You, me, together"
- He sought a private conversation with Putin, did not inform any of his own White House staff or national security advisers of the meeting
They don't need a veto proof one. He would never veto it. Just needs enough to break his talking points of "Republicans are united" and show to the the average person that a strong bipartisan majority is for opening govt, and he's the obstacle. Same with McCoonel.
That's. Uh. Yeah, exactly what it looks like, lol.I was just about to post this. It looks like he's asking Putin to join him in the coat room for a quickie.