Because the media is perpetually shit at calling a spade a spade (shocking!) we can excuse people for ignoring the obvious evidence in front of their eyes? The same media that struggled for years to even call Trump a liar? What even is this? The racism was plain as day, or were the rally signs of nooses not clear enough? If someone needed Trump to help them work backward to figure that out then they're blind.
They can still be plainly bigoted and racist and still be considered a legitimate movement. I never suggested otherwise and the things aren't mutually exclusive.
You're right that Buttigieg pandering to them in Indiana of all places shouldn't be some scandalous thing, but it's also the same reason he should not be the Democratic candidate for President.
I'm not panicked, just good to have a backup plan.
Endorsing the tea party seems opportunistic. Honestly that is the thread behind all of Pete's moves. I get it that that is part of politics. However, he is doing it to the point that you got to see it as a Candidate's personality flaw.I think the best Pete criticism should be along the lines of, "He's making rookies mistakes. When he's more experienced in politics he'll know better than to make those errors." It puts him in his place and reminds voters he's inexperienced; I'm not sure Kamala is the one to deliver that, though.
I assume the picture was added by someone Googling for stock photos featuring African-Americans. There's nothing in that photo that stands out as Kenyan/African. It's a coincidence that resonates because of birtherism.
The picture at the Holocaust Memorial seems a bit out of Pete's hands, too. His husband posted an Instagram picture. I actually think it's a nice artistic photo. I lived in DC; I saw plenty of tourists taking photos at somber memorials with inappropriate expressions (that's what this controversy is, right? That he has a slight smile in a hallowed place?), and this was before omnipresent social media and ubiquitous cameras. Don't lie to me that you don't take photos in the same places. He's not posing ridiculously and it's pretty disingenuous to link him with Grindr dudes posing shirtless trying to get laid.
The endorsements, however, are a real fuck-up. "Opting out" of endorsements is a slimy move. And it was unneeded! He had 400 people endorsing his plan, he didn't need to lie that it was also endorsing him for President.
Was? But no longer? Seems like a silly reason to shut down a forum, are people just panicking over a perceived worst case scenario? Look, I've never been a mod but I've been around long enough to know that there will be serious issues that arise with mod personnel on a forum from time to time. ANY forum. It doesn't matter what kind of forum it is.I scrolled back and there was anti-trans mods and people are calling them out on their bullshit. Also yeah I too would like a poli-era discord link if shit hits the fan
In the event that it happens, can someone PM me an invite to poliera discord?
That's not what happened at allI scrolled back and there was anti-trans mods and people are calling them out on their bullshit. Also yeah I too would like a poli-era discord link if shit hits the fan
Here's hoping there isn't thin purple line.Please don't panic over a couple of bad egg mods. This isn't a site-wide problem and the admins have nothing to do with this. Let's see how they respond, hopefully the mods get removed and we all move on.
This is nothing like the GAF situation.
@NatashaBertrand
Volker was at the July 10 meeting w/ Ukrainian officials when both Giuliani and investigations were brought up by Sondland, per Hill and Vindman. But he testified that neither were mentioned.
Revising his testimony to say he was further out of the loop than he already indicated? https://twitter.com/npfandos/status/1196608943776288768 …
Nicholas Fandos
✔
@npfandos
NEW: Volker plans to tell lawmakers Tuesday that he was out of the loop at key moments of Trump's pressure campaign on Ukraine
He will seek to reconcile his closed-door description w/conflicting versions offered by other witnesses@peterbakernythttps://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/18/us/politics/trump-impeachment.html?rref=collection%2Fbyline%2Fpeter-baker&action=click&contentCollection=undefined®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=collection …
08:28 - 19 Nov 2019
Breaking News: The Swedish authorities said they would end an investigation of rape and sexual assault allegations against the Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange https://nyti.ms/2r8OBVK
Everyone in the discord bunker.
Agreed.yeah. I think just replace the problematic mods. I don't think we need to start a new new site.
So Cenk Uygur is keeping his spot as TYT host (apparently; I don't watch). Seems kind of unethical while he's running for office and already has a media empire that will support him.
I don't know.
Yep, good way to completely kill a communityI don't know.
Using the nuclear option whenever a large issue comes up seems insane.
I wonder about those people trump sent to Hawaii and they could not believe what they found.I am sure it is in the same imaginary pile with all the other "evidence" Trump and Giuilani has on all their bullshit claims.