That sounds promising.Beto is like a goat, and clearly cannot resist climbing on top of shit.
If Beto fell off a car or table at one of these would it end his campaign hopes like a Dukakis tank or Dean Byahhh?
He won’t do shit.Oh and Trump wants to investigate the “other side”. So much for anyone thinking this is the best result in terms of the country not getting torn apart. He’s going to make sure that happens anyway.
Takes bullshit to know it.
Like I said, this isn't a good summary even with all of the spin and crowing from Trump and co. Much like 2018, where they were early on claiming "red wave" and the media paroting stupid drivel like "this wasn't a wave!". Then a few weeks later, it was a wave of historic proportions.I wish it felt like 2018. To me it feels like the continued slow death of this democracy.
tbh sometimes I can't tell whether it's someone making a deliberately bad-faith argument or just being really fucking dumb.Also heads up that ResetEra is currently being inundated with bad actors and it’s pretty obvious.
Twelve on one side, a dozen on the other.tbh sometimes I can't tell whether it's someone making a deliberately bad-faith argument or just being really fucking dumb.
Mueller isn't going to say shit unless subpoenaed.I know Mueller is a stickler for rules and authority, but I would find it hard to believe that after spending two years on this investigation he'd be content with just staying quiet if Barr's summary was a major misrepresentation of the report.
tbh sometimes I can't tell whether it's someone making a deliberately bad-faith argument or just being really fucking dumb.
you must really hate pictures of trees.
Listen to the trees
The Senate results are a harbinger for the future of the United States. Things are going to get bad when a small percentage of the country has a monopoly on the most powerful branch of Congress.https://www.resetera.com/threads/us...t-babs-is-surging.78319/page-85#post-14676703
For comedy's sake (we need it in this day of fuckery), here is when the 2018 election day thread turned and we thought we were gonna live in the endtimes. I imagine a lot of people will look back on today similarly and realize they were too emotional at the moment.
Fuck you. You're the reason we got here in the first place.
According to Barr if they don’t find evidence you committed the crime you can’t have obstructed justice.... which makes zero sense. Means you just have to obstruct so much that they can’t find evidence.Eyy! What the hell does a guy gotta do to obstruct some justice around here!?
My reading is it's number 2. My guess is the report is maybe 60% of how bad it could have been for Trump. That it's not as bad as it could have been but that it's still pretty damning and Barr's trying to spin that down (which is why you get the "no exoneration but no collusion" angle even in this letter).Reading Twitter. My bad, sure. But there are three main credible theories happening:
1. This is so bad that NatSec stuff is happening behind the scenes and Barr/Rosentein put a good face on it to buy time while it unfolds. There’s a lot more to see here.
2. This is the best (worst) possible reading of a really bad report by Republicans being cowardly and the main thing to hang your hat on are the remaining investigations. (Southpaw)
3. Mueller was never going to do an actual investigation and he was only running out the clock while the Russian mob took over the US Government and consolidated power under a fascist puppet. (Kendzior)
I, uh, am going with #1.
Are you just being disingenuous or did you forget what the map of 2016 was for the Senate? (ie. the worst possible map to defend)The Senate results are a harbinger for the future of the United States. Things are going to get bad when a small percentage of the country has a monopoly on the most powerful branch of Congress.
The future senate map is not great either.Are you just being disingenuous or did you forget what the map of 2016 was for the Senate? (ie. the worst possible map to defend)
Okay, but what about staff who helped POTUS obstruct justice? I thought the whole point of their oath was that they serve the rule of law, not the chain of command.According to Barr if they don’t find evidence you committed the crime you can’t have obstructed justice.... which makes zero sense. Means you just have to obstruct so much that they can’t find evidence.
Beautiful and talented.
Trump won all over again, folks. Wrap it up. Kellyanne has spoken.
They'll lose a number of seats in 2020 where currently they have remnants in states that have transitioned. The Senate map will forever be bad so long as it is strongly diluted by empty states that are R, but it has a good probability of swinging back in 2020 and 2022 as more "old seats" go up for grabs in states that have shifted from purple to blue.
This is the right strategy. Mueller critically pointing out that he did not exonerate Trump is the real buried lede that needs to be pulled out of the ground.
Also pointing out the bias of Barr, that's crucial.This is the right strategy. Mueller critically pointing out that he did not exonerate Trump is the real buried lede that needs to be pulled out of the ground.
Number 3, good lord.Reading Twitter. My bad, sure. But there are three main credible theories happening:
1. This is so bad that NatSec stuff is happening behind the scenes and Barr/Rosentein put a good face on it to buy time while it unfolds. There’s a lot more to see here.
2. This is the best (worst) possible reading of a really bad report by Republicans being cowardly and the main thing to hang your hat on are the remaining investigations. (Southpaw)
3. Mueller was never going to do an actual investigation and he was only running out the clock while the Russian mob took over the US Government and consolidated power under a fascist puppet. (Kendzior)
I, uh, am going with #1.
I'm talking about the structure of the Senate itself. As time goes on the in the US most of the population will be concentrated in a few large states while a bunch of low populated small states will have most of the Senate. The Senate is already kind of like this but it will just get worse. I remember reading some estimates that say by 2040 30% of the US population will control 70% of the Senate.Are you just being disingenuous or did you forget what the map of 2016 was for the Senate? (ie. the worst possible map to defend)
Are you just being disingenuous or did you forget what the map of 2016 was for the Senate? (ie. the worst possible map to defend)
The senate is not in a good place in general, but that map was terrible in 2016 as the map is terrible in 2020 for Republicans.[/QUOTE]
Assuming you're talking about 2018, this is in no way true. The only thing close to what we faced in ND, IN and MO is CO with Gardner.
Not only that but the dude believes the President literally cannot obstruct justice. It’s no surprise that was his conclusion...
Yes I agree with this (check the edit). But the map in 2020 will be stretched for Republicans with also motivated D voters in a presidential year. They'll absolutely lose Garder's seat and depending on what Moore does in Alabama, we could even see the unlikely scenario of a seat maintained if there's nothing good fielded in Alabama or if Moore runs to split the vote.I'm talking about the structure of the Senate itself. As time goes on the in the US most of the population will be concentrated in a few large states while a bunch of low populated small states will have most of the Senate. The Senate is already kind of like this but it will just get worse. I remember reading some estimates that say by 2040 30% of the US population will control 70% of the Senate.
I wouldn't expect much from Mueller, he isn't the type of person to want to get into a heated partisan debate like this, and his testimony would likely jeopradize the 12+ investigations that he handed off to other prosecutors.
If the report isn't released, they may pull him in to elaborate on the lack of exoneration but he may also never be pulled in because he cannot bypass the DoJ in speaking on the details of his report.
He will need to be subpoenaed as he likely will not talk about investigative work openly without that threat, much like Banks require you to subpoena them in order to get financial records otherwise they enter into legal complication with the person or institution that record is about. Mueller has done congressional hearings on cases before so he will likely be very open to doing it otherwise.