It's not her looks that make her ugly, it's the way she sneers at the press and lies to our face.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
US PoliEra 2019 |OT3| YOU WERE AT MY WEDDING, DENISE
- Thread starter Ogodei
- Start date
- Status
It's not her looks that make her ugly, it's the way she sneers at the press and lies to our face.
Downtown mpls sales tax is like 11.5% iirc thanks to our publicly funded stadium viking billionaire overlords.
The idea of dating someone because of your mutual fondness for a specific president is so weird.
Oh for sure, she's an awful human being to the core, but that's not how I took your comment. Thanks for changing it. :)
I dunno, I think I can see it working as an initial reason to date someone if you're both into Obama or Hillary. But, yeah, Trump is just bizarre.
I think it's more about finding people who won't automatically dump you when they find out you voted for trump. And racists.
Maybe it's the big beautiful door.
No problem. I couldn't help the word play, but you're right, I don't have to rag on her for that.
I have no idea what you're talking about. I've had a lot of great dates based on my date and I both being way into James Polk. Maybe you're the weird one, ever think of that?!?!?!?
CNN Just reported that White House sources tell them regulations protect Trump from negative information to come out if he's not charged with a crime.
Which of course they are saying that, but I'm giddy at wondering *why* they're saying that on background
Which of course they are saying that, but I'm giddy at wondering *why* they're saying that on background
The thing is he can't be charged with a crime while president
That's pretty convenient. Still waiting for Trump's "Comey 4 Clinton" moment.
If your report card is all A+'ses, you don't tell your parents that school regulations prohibit them from releasing grades unless you got an F
Mike DeBonis ✔
@mikedebonis
Inside Thursday's tense House Dems meeting: an exasperated Pelosi demanding moderates stiffen their spines, AOC threatening to put them on "a list" and mods begging for forbearance.
GOP floor mischief paying off in spades...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powe...d163fe-3b87-11e9-a06c-3ec8ed509d15_story.html
@mikedebonis
Inside Thursday's tense House Dems meeting: an exasperated Pelosi demanding moderates stiffen their spines, AOC threatening to put them on "a list" and mods begging for forbearance.
GOP floor mischief paying off in spades...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powe...d163fe-3b87-11e9-a06c-3ec8ed509d15_story.html
Last edited:
Hey I'm not saying the idea of someone waxing poetic about Eisenhower doesn't get me hot and bothered but I'm not about to join an app dedicated to it.
We have evidence he committed crimes while President and he's been named in charging documents as individual 1. There isn't a reason he shouldn't already be impeached, but Dems are taking it slow waiting for Mueller before they do anything
It's a stupid strategy unless they know Mueller has the goods. Right now they're playing into the people saying "unless you have a signed collusion contact between Vlad and Trump, then you got nothing"
Like you said, there's enough to open proceedings. The vote isn't happening yet
What do people expect will happen if the house impeaches Trump? It goes to the Senate, where there aren't 66 votes to convict, and so he gets to crow about the senate finding him not guilty, the base gets charged up for 2020, and he's not removed from office. Where's the upside?
You might as well start hearings now. It's a long process. More info can be added to it over time like info from Mueller.
So, how do you solve the fact that you won't get 66 votes in the Senate to convict? I feel like you're ignoring this, and it's the biggest problem you have.
So never impeach? Republicans in Senate will never vote to impeach him in those numbers.
You're ignoring that impeachment is a long investigative process.
Who knows? What they turn up might get you to 66 votes.
They're probably referring to the rules regarding how the SC report is handed to the AG and how that's shared with congress which is old news.
Rather big fucking loophole in our democracy.
Can't commit crimes while running for President but if you commit enough crimes that it helps you become president it's all fine. Like that encourages you to just go for fucking broke if you've started down that path.
Moderates being garbage as per usual, it's like they dont know they will be voted out come 2022 no matter how they vote lmao.
This is why the House needs to be expanded, to better represent the population.
Republicans aren't going to have the first ever president in our country's history that is removed forcibly from office be part of the Republican party. We simply will never get that 66 vote threshold, dont dive into extreme fantasy.
Yes, why impeach him when you'll only make him stronger going into 2020?
Classic "I don't have a solution, so I'll just hope one shows up before I need it."
Christian mingle is a thing. Arranged marriage within specific faiths are a thing. Why not a site for trumpists?
It's basically a site that reads "Hey aspiring Maria Butinas, here's a site which has all the marks pre-selected for you!"
Yes, tell that to clinton after he got impeached...
Clinton's job approval rating ranged from 36% in mid-1993 to 64% in late 1993 and early 1994.[1] In his second term, his rating consistently ranged from the high-50s to the high-60s.[1][2] After his impeachment proceedings in 1998 and 1999, Clinton's rating reached its highest point at 73% approval.[3] He finished with a Gallup poll approval rating of 65%,[4] higher than that of every other departing president measured since Harry Truman.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_image_of_Bill_Clinton
Super hurt by impeachment....
i know decorum and all that but this is national security for fucks sake. SUBPOENA HIS ASS NOW
I think it was something like "michael Cohen said there was no collusion".
- Status