I lean toward believing Trump won't win re-election but after 2016 I have a hard time using polling numbers to justify that sense.
Polls were dead on in 2018.I lean toward believing Trump won't win re-election but after 2016 I have a hard time using polling numbers to justify that sense.
|OT5| Mass Debaters Keep Eye on Blue Ball
I don't necessarily believe they actually factor in the undercover Trump supporters. Maybe I'll have my faith restored but I'm going to look at any poll with Trump with a healthy dose of skepticism.I lean toward believing Trump won't win re-election but after 2016 I have a hard time using polling numbers to justify that sense.
Apparently the 4 Trump kids have booked out the entire floor at some 5-star hotel in London, for their visit with the Queen etc. The most expensive room in the hotel is $27,000 a night. First of all, why are they there at all? Second, are US taxpayers paying for all of this? I expect so, since those grifters never pay for anything themselves.
https://www./news/article-7094767/T...loor-22-000-night-five-star-London-hotel.html
...I don't think there are shy Trumpers. They're loud and proud. The problem in 2016 was a huge number of undecideds the week before the election, but we have a discrete event, the Comey letter, that made them break a certain way. In other words, we've accounted for the result.I don't necessarily believe they actually factor in the undercover Trump supporters. Maybe I'll have my faith restored but I'm going to look at any poll with Trump with a healthy dose of skepticism.
Yeah, why isn't Biden at this thing? He's conspicuous in his absence.
Mulvaney.I think he (Mulvane) is prepared to burn it all down to further his ambitioun. Letting Trump be Trump only helps him in the end. Also he seems to enjoy watching Trump take the torch to everything. If anyone deserved a punch to the face it's that guy.
I was curious what you were responding to, so I hit "show ignored content". Oh, it's just chainlinkspiral being an asshole again.You know, with the way I'm antagonized on this forum sometimes, you'd think I was some kind of petulant troll. If you don't like me, you can just say that instead of suggesting that I'm a low effort poster. If the goal is to get me to stop posting here (which I feel is a growing sentiment) then you might succeed on that front because I did not come here for this.
Yeah, why isn't Biden at this thing? He's conspicuous in his absence.
Yeah, why isn't Biden at this thing? He's conspicuous in his absence.
Hopefully he's just playing low-key as the presumptive nominee (he probably has a better chance losing support by showing up everywhere and being himself than laying low and letting the rest of the field eat each other early on).Yeah, why isn't Biden at this thing? He's conspicuous in his absence.
Oh god. Details?Glenn Greenwald being a shitbomb on the Pelosi video doctorer. Seriously, he is such a shitbomb I can't even express it.
I don't necessarily believe they actually factor in the undercover Trump supporters. Maybe I'll have my faith restored but I'm going to look at any poll with Trump with a healthy dose of skepticism.
Democrats learn fucking nothing. And I put some of the blame on some extent to the nobodies who have made the primary into an embarrassment.
It also covers for their own insecurities because you know they're the first to flip shit when someone wishes them happy holidays.Undercover Trump supporters don't exist. The entire appeal, for Trumpers, is triggering the libs as frequently and aggressively as possible. That's why they wear the fucking hat, that's why they cover their vehicles in bumper stickers, and that's why they've had Trump flags and/or signs in their yards since 2015.
They love knowing that they make people uncomfortable. They're proud of who they are.
Democrats learn fucking nothing. And I put some of the blame on some extent to the nobodies who have made the primary into an embarrassment.
Oh wow, that's actually much worse than I would have expected.
Actually single-issue pro-lifers are more undercover in that they hate Trump as a person but will proudly vote for him anyway. They won't get his propaganda paraphernalia but they will admit they will vote for him because of the "babies."Undercover Trump supporters don't exist. The entire appeal, for Trumpers, is triggering the libs as frequently and aggressively as possible. That's why they wear the fucking hat, that's why they cover their vehicles in bumper stickers, and that's why they've had Trump flags and/or signs in their yards since 2015.
They love knowing that they make people uncomfortable. They're proud of who they are.
Facebook helping out with doxxing is good?Oh wow, that's actually much worse than I would have expected.
He defends the creator of the hoax video by referring to them as "an African American day laborer."
It's perfectly in line with Greenwald and others like him viewing race only as a prop to be used to advance their other interests.He defends the creator of the hoax video by referring to them as "an African American day laborer."
Which I guess for Greenwald justifies spreading misinformation somehow?
Not exactly how I would have framed it but it's weird to focus on that rather than the Facebook doxxing part, which is incredibly shitty of them. Especially since they won't even take the video down!He defends the creator of the hoax video by referring to them as "an African American day laborer."
Which I guess for Greenwald justifies spreading misinformation somehow?
It seems if you are going to use a service and lie and blame someone else, and that service says you are lying, that's doxxing. Thanks for the insight.
I think them handing out personal information for a user they do not believe has even broken the terms of use of the site is incredibly concerning and I'd be worried about them doing it with other users.Facebook should publicly identify people using their platform to spread lies and misinformation. Yes, I think that's fair.
I think them handing out personal information for a user they do not believe has even broken the terms of use of the site is incredibly concerning and I'd be worried about them doing it with other users.
You believe Greenwald's paper thin smear. Facebook didn't give out the information, the user did himself, on Facebook.I think them handing out personal information for a user they do not believe has even broken the terms of use of the site is incredibly concerning and I'd be worried about them doing it with other users.
You can't even post on facebook under an alias.
It's against their TOS.
I'm not taking this from Greenwald at all - I first saw it being reported by this person:You believe Greenwald's paper thin smear. Facebook didn't give out the information, the user did himself, on Facebook.
"To the outside observer, the two pages are unconnected, but after a tell-tale link on one of the pages led The Daily Beast to Brooks, he admitted that the ad revenue for both outlets goes directly into his personal PayPal account."
That doesn't mean they can stop people from pretending to be someone else or use a fake name.
Democrats learn fucking nothing. And I put some of the blame on some extent to the nobodies who have made the primary into an embarrassment.
Facebook will freeze your account and force you to prove your identity if they suspect it's a fake account.
I'm not taking this from Greenwald at all - I first saw it being reported by this person: