Even JFK looks disappointed
Attack dog him like Kamala at the next debate (hopefully they're together this month). Those two should just corrode the fuck out of his numbers by using his bullshit record against him.I'm not sure what can be done to corrode those numbers. I wonder what Warren can do to strengthen herself here?
I LOLd at this. God damn.Oh my god. He seriously showed up to the White House looking like a create a character from Tony Hawk's Pro Skater.
Tim Ryan grifting like a true Youngstown man. Never been more proud!
But seriously, stop this charade.
It's really hard to say. He has not made a single video criticizing conservatives in years (from what I can tell), but his fans seem to be convinced that he's definitely a liberal because he says he is. So. Not the brightest bulbs. But pretty awesome grift.What happened to timcast, he was like the only source of video during Ferguson (same fucking hat too)
When did he turn into a shitlord
Fuuuuuuuuuck y'all are on a rollHe looks like Chris-R minus the black tanktop, I can't get that out of my head
It's really hard to say. He has not made a single video criticizing conservatives in years (from what I can tell), but his fans seem to be convinced that he's definitely a liberal because he says he is. So. Not the brightest bulbs. But pretty awesome grift.
What happened to timcast, he was like the only source of video during Ferguson (same fucking hat too)
When did he turn into a shitlord
I dont know if Warren has a good chance of eroding black voter support from Biden. I think her best chance is to hope Kamala erodes his base enough to put her in the lead without Biden completely collapsing
He really should be focusing on keeping his seat. Pretty sure the state GOP smells blood in the water in his district.
Pretty much, I don't really know who he is other than he's apparently an alt-right fucko, but I know about The Room and THPS so I laughed anyway.I know i'd only regret it if I took the time to learn who that guy is, so I'll just enjoy ya'll slamming on him and move on :)
Pretty much, I don't really know who he is other than he's apparently an alt-right fucko, but I know about The Room and THPS so I laughed anyway.
Just heard Barr speak after Trump. Goddamn, he's such a willing, shameless Trump bootlicker.
I actually feel gaslit by today's bullshit. This is bordering on abusive.
What a joke.Mike Gravel is about 7k donors away from making the debate. What a waste of time and money for everyone involved.
So we'd have the healing orbs lady and the 9/11 truther on stage. Awesome.They may actually make it, which would be quite the impressive feat
I don't even know who that is...
Except the average layman knew who Trump was. No one except fucking nerds like us know who Steyer is.There are so many things Tom Stayer can do with his money.
So many good, humanitarian things.
Instead he decides to waste it on a vanity presidential run. Probably thinking that it worked for Trump and it might work for him.
Weird that a SC poll counts. I thought only national ones did.
1) They can't. They have to use total population to apportion districts. If they tried to use only the citizen population, it'd get to court so fast their heads would spin. SCOTUS ruled as recently as 2016 that non-citizen population must be included in legislative district totals. That part is a bluff. Including the question itself was always just a play to depress Hispanics' response rates. They still would've had to count non-citizens (people who answered no to the question) in the totals. They were just hoping people wouldn't respond at all.Barr saying they're going to use citizenship data anyway to determine apportionment is ominous as fuck.
Weird that a SC poll counts. I thought only national ones did.
And completely unconstitutional.Barr saying they're going to use citizenship data anyway to determine apportionment is ominous as fuck.
The way he framed it as being in dispute, though, makes me think we could see a big push from them to try to get the courts to rule differently.1) They can't. They have to use total population to apportion districts. If they tried to use only the citizen population, it'd get to court so fast their heads would spin. SCOTUS ruled as recently as 2016 that non-citizen population must be included in legislative district totals. That part is a bluff. Including the question itself was always just a play to depress Hispanics' response rates. They still would've had to count non-citizens (people who answered no to the question) in the totals. They were just hoping people wouldn't respond at all.
The stakes couldn't be higher.