Did you mean to respond to me? I didn't assert that such a ruling on the CRA would apply to state legislation, so I'm not sure where that came from.
But to your point, even in these cases where a standard baseline for the rights of individuals is lessened, I still don't think that it's sustainable to have a unified country in which women, black and brown people, LGBT+ people, etc., functionally cannot live and work peacefully in various parts of said country.
I don't think war or secession are optimal solutions or even realistic solutions.
I foresee two possibilities:
1. The states essentially weaken the federal government over the next few decades by ignoring it as the power of the presidency/Congress shifts back and forth between the two major parties. With little power or authority imbued within it by the states, it acts essentially as a unified military forces and re-distributor of funding to different states, but the state governments are where the power ultimately comes to lie.
2. Demographics really do win out, the GOP goes extinct, and something less shitty replaces it.
EDIT: Well, there is a 3. Rising sea levels ravage the coasts, city dwellers move into the interior of the country, and we get a sharp uptick in right-wing terrorism as Democratic voters fill the formerly red flyover states. The GOP can't win the Senate, much less the Presidency, but the country sees some violent-ass times before we have a massive die-off because we fucked up our planet.